Embargo.

[WestLondonRam]

So the EFl say “further information was filed” 

not accounts are in. Clearly Nixon is right no accounts submitted we sent information not accounts. 
 

[ossieram]

Just now, WestLondonRam said:

So the EFl say “further information was filed” 

not accounts are in. Clearly Nixon is right no accounts submitted we sent information not accounts. 
 

How do you know?

[hintonsboots]

4 minutes ago, ossieram said:

How do you know?

Exactly. How does Alan Nixon get access to information that is confidential and much of it covered by NDA’s. He is omnipresent obviously.

[NottsRam77]

6 minutes ago, WestLondonRam said:

So the EFl say “further information was filed” 

not accounts are in. Clearly Nixon is right no accounts submitted we sent information not accounts. 
 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline

then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

[hintonsboots]

4 minutes ago, NottsRam77 said:

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline

then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

 

[Sparkle]

5 minutes ago, NottsRam77 said:

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline

then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

This makes sense - so we brought forward several accountancy firms then ? 

[MackworthRamIsGod]

We were probably asked to provide proof of the valuation of the stadium that was carried out all those years back.

[Boycie]

8 minutes ago, NottsRam77 said:

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline

then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

They wanted us to show the workings out. 
 

[NottsRam77]

3 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

This makes sense - so we brought forward several accountancy firms then ? 

? 

[RadioactiveWaste]

4 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said:

We were probably asked to provide proof of the valuation of the stadium that was carried out all those years back.

Wouldn't that have all been gone through in the orginal hearing (that we won?) - any question on that can be pointed back to the ruling with a note that the EFL did not appeal that part of the verdict.

[Abu Derby]

Didn’t file them enough apparently, resulting in Gibbo sustaining a cut finger. 

[Dan_Ram]

Any clues in the post match interviews? ??

[RoyMac5]

14 minutes ago, Dan_Ram said:

Any clues in the post match interviews? ??

 

[Woodypecker]

No clues from Rooney post-match.

Just a repeat for 'help', needing players and for the club to sort things out soon. ?

 

 

[DCFC1388]

The banner across the bottom of SSN states we have submitted the accounts before the deadline

[kevinhectoring]

5 hours ago, maxjam said:

Not according to Nixon...

 

Bet Nixon has done no more than looked at companies house site and seen the accounts are not uploaded. I don’t think he’s got a clue what we have given the EFl 

[DCFC1388]

9 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

The banner across the bottom of SSN states we have submitted the accounts before the deadline

 

[jimbobram]

10 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

The banner across the bottom of SSN states we have submitted the accounts before the deadline

Show us ? 

[Yani P]

3 minutes ago, jimbobram said:

Show us ? 

Timing ?

[Comrade 86]

5 minutes ago, jimbobram said:

Show us ?