Jump to content

Patrick Roberts - Gone to Troyes on loan


inter politics

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ThePrisoner said:

Just cause it's not announced doesn't mean it isn't done

 

7 minutes ago, 86 Hair Islands said:

Because Boro have to confirm his release and they only signed Mendez-Laing at 10.37. Think you're getting irritated with the wrong party buddy!

Just a bit tongue in cheek.  The post does look quite serious.  Obviously the fella going to Boro was the main target .  This blokes been available for a few hours- if he is. Will be difficult to get this one done in that time.  Boro won't be in a rush to do us a favour. I'm disappointed we haven't got a pacy striker in . We really needed that option.  Might be Lawrence up top in an emergency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 86 Hair Islands said:

Hoping this is the mechanism for the EFL as well as that would give me a deal more confidence than us being at the mercy of the EFL. Hopefully this is the case and we're simply agreeing terms with the players ?

 

Think you do get till 1am aswell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought I'd have a quick look on OTIB as there recent loathing of us is always good for a chuckle. Today was always going to be a good one if we signed anybody.  Turns out there's a weeks worth and it's gone full house party at Norman Bates. Here's a sample for your bedtime reading you illiterate lot. This is one post by the way.

Few observations on this:

The OP appeared to have jumped the gun- think a few were cheering early as well but anyway.

Would/should Keogh not be classed as a Football Creditor? I'd argue there might be a case but maybe that's 2+2=5? It's being appealed in any event (about the only thing that is appealing about that club).

Are they all up to date on their Tax ie on Player Wages- granted clubs will have taken advantage of the tax delays, but delay and defer is quite different to waived. EFL also decided to waive requirements for clubs in terms of Transfer Embargo if overdue taxation etc, presumably with Government blessing.

Those loans from MSD will still need repaying- along with any interest due.

Gabay's charge also still shows not cleared as yet, see Gellaw Newco 202 and Gellaw Newco 204.

Possible they have blocked the George Evans sale too.

On a side note, aren't their players generous- fancy not getting paid correctly and not only playing on but playing to win- same with Sheffield Wednesday, 13 pts from 6 games since wage issues came to light- is there a lesson??

Brighton seem generous too- would you leave a player on loan at a club when wage issues kick in at said club (see Matt Clarke). They lost £67.2m last season FFS! Why would you help out a club who have cash flow issues when you yourself made enormous (but owner covered in part no doubt) losses- I wouldn't! How much of Clarke's wages are Derby paying?

I also note Mel Morris is a CBE- he sure is...insert your own wording though, mine well and truly would differ to the official one. 

PPS- Deferred wages and this is far from a Derby specific issue, have these also been settled in full- both at Derby and other clubs. If not they represent Football Creditors and if that's the case, I question why they are not under restrictions.

Also on another (final) side note, based on DCFCFans their fans do seem somewhat- and their ranting at Matt Hughes and claims of bias on Twitter- they do at least based on a sample, seem somewhat illiterate financially speaking in a football sense. I read OwlsTalk from time to time and they do seem to have a number who know what they're on about Accounting wise, possible sign off issues- they're thin on the ground on Derby's main forum. Perhaps I'm not reading in any great depth and extrapolating unfairly.

Edited 10 hours ago by Mr Popodopolous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

Thought I'd have a quick look on OTIB as there recent loathing of us is always good for a chuckle. Today was always going to be a good one if we signed anybody.  Turns out there's a weeks worth and it's gone full house party at Norman Bates. Here's a sample for your bedtime reading you illiterate lot. This is one post by the way.

Few observations on this:

The OP appeared to have jumped the gun- think a few were cheering early as well but anyway.

Would/should Keogh not be classed as a Football Creditor? I'd argue there might be a case but maybe that's 2+2=5? It's being appealed in any event (about the only thing that is appealing about that club).

Are they all up to date on their Tax ie on Player Wages- granted clubs will have taken advantage of the tax delays, but delay and defer is quite different to waived. EFL also decided to waive requirements for clubs in terms of Transfer Embargo if overdue taxation etc, presumably with Government blessing.

Those loans from MSD will still need repaying- along with any interest due.

Gabay's charge also still shows not cleared as yet, see Gellaw Newco 202 and Gellaw Newco 204.

Possible they have blocked the George Evans sale too.

On a side note, aren't their players generous- fancy not getting paid correctly and not only playing on but playing to win- same with Sheffield Wednesday, 13 pts from 6 games since wage issues came to light- is there a lesson??

Brighton seem generous too- would you leave a player on loan at a club when wage issues kick in at said club (see Matt Clarke). They lost £67.2m last season FFS! Why would you help out a club who have cash flow issues when you yourself made enormous (but owner covered in part no doubt) losses- I wouldn't! How much of Clarke's wages are Derby paying?

I also note Mel Morris is a CBE- he sure is...insert your own wording though, mine well and truly would differ to the official one. 

PPS- Deferred wages and this is far from a Derby specific issue, have these also been settled in full- both at Derby and other clubs. If not they represent Football Creditors and if that's the case, I question why they are not under restrictions.

Also on another (final) side note, based on DCFCFans their fans do seem somewhat- and their ranting at Matt Hughes and claims of bias on Twitter- they do at least based on a sample, seem somewhat illiterate financially speaking in a football sense. I read OwlsTalk from time to time and they do seem to have a number who know what they're on about Accounting wise, possible sign off issues- they're thin on the ground on Derby's main forum. Perhaps I'm not reading in any great depth and extrapolating unfairly.

Edited 10 hours ago by Mr Popodopolous

We should remove the swear and abuse filters when it come to said person, even if just for 10 minutes hate a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

Thought I'd have a quick look on OTIB as there recent loathing of us is always good for a chuckle. Today was always going to be a good one if we signed anybody.  Turns out there's a weeks worth and it's gone full house party at Norman Bates. Here's a sample for your bedtime reading you illiterate lot. This is one post by the way.

Few observations on this:

The OP appeared to have jumped the gun- think a few were cheering early as well but anyway.

Would/should Keogh not be classed as a Football Creditor? I'd argue there might be a case but maybe that's 2+2=5? It's being appealed in any event (about the only thing that is appealing about that club).

Are they all up to date on their Tax ie on Player Wages- granted clubs will have taken advantage of the tax delays, but delay and defer is quite different to waived. EFL also decided to waive requirements for clubs in terms of Transfer Embargo if overdue taxation etc, presumably with Government blessing.

Those loans from MSD will still need repaying- along with any interest due.

Gabay's charge also still shows not cleared as yet, see Gellaw Newco 202 and Gellaw Newco 204.

Possible they have blocked the George Evans sale too.

On a side note, aren't their players generous- fancy not getting paid correctly and not only playing on but playing to win- same with Sheffield Wednesday, 13 pts from 6 games since wage issues came to light- is there a lesson??

Brighton seem generous too- would you leave a player on loan at a club when wage issues kick in at said club (see Matt Clarke). They lost £67.2m last season FFS! Why would you help out a club who have cash flow issues when you yourself made enormous (but owner covered in part no doubt) losses- I wouldn't! How much of Clarke's wages are Derby paying?

I also note Mel Morris is a CBE- he sure is...insert your own wording though, mine well and truly would differ to the official one. 

PPS- Deferred wages and this is far from a Derby specific issue, have these also been settled in full- both at Derby and other clubs. If not they represent Football Creditors and if that's the case, I question why they are not under restrictions.

Also on another (final) side note, based on DCFCFans their fans do seem somewhat- and their ranting at Matt Hughes and claims of bias on Twitter- they do at least based on a sample, seem somewhat illiterate financially speaking in a football sense. I read OwlsTalk from time to time and they do seem to have a number who know what they're on about Accounting wise, possible sign off issues- they're thin on the ground on Derby's main forum. Perhaps I'm not reading in any great depth and extrapolating unfairly.

Edited 10 hours ago by Mr Popodopolous

Well @Gee SCREAMER !! all I can say to that is bore off Mr Popodickapus or what ever his  “yawn ? ???????” name is!?

1-0 to the Super Rams ??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...