Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Funny you mention that -  Q does not seem to understand what is their role. They keep mumbling about securing the bidder that will provide the best long term future for the club. Not their job. 

Surely that depends on how the debts will be repaid - if there is a payment plan covering several years, it would be remiss of them to choose a PB that may not have a long-term plan for the club......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Funny you mention that -  Q does not seem to understand what is their role. They keep mumbling about securing the bidder that will provide the best long term future for the club. Not their job. 

Just PR, no matter how many times you try to sound clever by trotting it out as evidence they don't know what they're doing.

If they kept mumbling about getting the best deal for creditors there'd be an avalanche of idiots getting mardy that they have no consideration for the club's future. It might please you to hear them state what their job is on a regular basis -  although probably not actually, you'd find fault whatever they said - but they have to pay some lip service here and there.

It's a difficult balance to achieve, putting out statements that appeal to / appease all of the uninformed, the moderately informed, and the over-informed who think they know better.

They can't really win, the only thing anyone actually wants them to say is that the deal is completed, their work is done, they've waived their fees, and the new owner will take things from here. Anything else, everything else, is treated with contempt due to people's impatience.

Edited by Coconut's Beard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Don’t think this is what solicitors do

It is part of any Solicitors who have the License for Administration...A Legal Service

Company Administrations

If your business is struggling and administration seems like a suitable route,  Solicitors can provide advice and assistance with the process. Whether you are a company director or a creditor , They have the expertise to help you ensure the best possible outcome is achieved.

Where a company is insolvent and the directors believe that the potential of the company is about to be harmed by the actions of a hostile creditor - often an aggressive landlord or the Crown - thought should be given to going into administration. This protective mechanism is designed to shield the company from its creditors while a restructuring plan can be completed.

Now i'm neither a Solicitor or Administrater, And this is just a stab in the Dark...not the Peter Sellers movie, But i'd guess Solicitors have a good handle on Insolvency Law.

https://www.irwinmitchell.com/personal/insolvency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coconut's Beard said:
41 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

 

Just PR, no matter how many times you try to sound clever by trotting it out as evidence they don't know what they're doing.

Agree it’s PR. There has been a lot of PR in their all too erratic comms. But we don’t want them preening we want them to focus on the job. It’s not a popularity contest.  Sorry, I think the evidence indicates they have been slow, they are under-resourced, they have not spotted the heffalump traps looming, their legal support is underpowered and their control of the bidding process in particular appears poor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Nixon is correct, Quantuma are playing chicken against 4 parties that are armed with a rocket launcher, machine gun, samurai and pistol and Q are holding a paper plane. 
  
If none of the bids are good enough to get the deal through now I dare say that liquidation looks more and more likely. 
 
You can’t keep making deadlines and then not following through when nobody coughs up. You just look foolish.

Edited by TomTom92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Agree it’s PR. There has been a lot of PR in their all too erratic comms. But we don’t want them preening we want them to focus on the job. It’s not a popularity contest.  Sorry, I think the evidence indicates they have been slow, they are under-resourced, they have not spotted the heffalump traps looming, their legal support is underpowered and their control of the bidding process in particular appears poor. 

You seem to have totally unrealistic expectations - especially so since you're only looking in from the outside and have no idea what they're actually dealing with on a daily basis - then judge them against those.

I find it a bizarrely imperious attitude tbh, but nothing new there.

There are no direct situations to compare their work against, no examples of other clubs facing the same circumstances we've had. If anything on the face of it far less complicated situations have seen other clubs in administration for many months longer than we have been.

Edited by Coconut's Beard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TomTom92 said:

If Nixon is correct, Quantuma are playing chicken against 4 parties that are armed with a rocket launcher, machine gun, samurai and pistol and Q are holding a paper plane. 
  
If none of the bids are good enough to get the deal through now I dare say that liquidation looks more and more likely. 
 
You can’t keep making deadlines and then not following through when nobody coughs up. You just look foolish.

How have the bidders got the upper hand if their bids don’t meet the minimum requirements ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said:

He's not even hiding it any more

image.png.1667dd2d7ebf5b21139c689063a14c52.png

 

Note the use of "we"

If all bids are subject to NDAs - how does he know how close they are or are not?

 

 

He was given 2 free tickets by the National Trust, But he didn't want to go as he doesn't know duck Hall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said:

He's not even hiding it any more

image.png.1667dd2d7ebf5b21139c689063a14c52.png

 

Note the use of "we"

If all bids are subject to NDAs - how does he know how close they are or are not?

 

 

If they haven’t “tried their luck with the Efl” this means that Nixon hasn’t heard anything from Efl, his main source of info.  Which means he knows nothing. No change there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we not basically just making stuff up and with no basis in actual facts at the moment?

All we know for sure us that bids have gone in and the administrators are considering them....that's it,nothing more.

Why don't we just wait and see what the end result is instead of working ourselves into a frenzy entirely based on overactive imaginations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...