duncanjwitham Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 Anyone else getting a bit of passive-aggressive DC-on-LAP action from this paragraph: Just missing some sarcastic air-quotes around "the LAP has found". ck-, Indy, Comrade 86 and 5 others 3 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NottsRam77 Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Spanish said: Timing is key points deducted at LAP2 or DC2 would have relegated us. If we breach it goes to DC3 and points are likely 21/22 Stop spoiling our moment with your factually correct knowledge lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 27 minutes ago, Carnero said: THIS case IS over. Err there is still the restatement, which I hope we fly through Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Spanish said: Err there is still the restatement, which I hope we fly through Err that would be an entirely new case, if it were to happen. For which we'd have mitigation given the EFL left it years before challenging our amortisation policy. RadioactiveWaste, r_wilcockson, Comrade 86 and 3 others 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mckram Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: Anyone else getting a bit of passive-aggressive DC-on-LAP action from this paragraph: Just missing some sarcastic air-quotes around "the LAP has found". Absolutely. If I was on the DC (especially if I was the accountant) I’d be furious with how the LAP have basically said you’ve not done your job properly so do it again. It’s a good job it wasn’t the LAP making the call on punishment as it could have been a totally different ending. duncanjwitham, RadioactiveWaste and r_wilcockson 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 15 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: Anyone else getting a bit of passive-aggressive DC-on-LAP action from this paragraph: Just missing some sarcastic air-quotes around "the LAP has found". That para is pretty hilarious. Basically a chartered accountant with much relvant experience and another accountant sitting on the panel did not think this was wrong, but the LAP, who were not accountants, did. NottsRam77, duncanjwitham, BucksRam and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 34 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: Anyone else getting a bit of passive-aggressive DC-on-LAP action from this paragraph: Just missing some sarcastic air-quotes around "the LAP has found". That's a classic paragraph exposing the whole accounting argument for what it was....a load of theoretical willy-waving. RadioactiveWaste and Comrade 86 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 2 hours ago, duncanjwitham said: There’s also a section in there stating that we have 2 possible amortisation models under consideration, a straight line one, and a non-straight one that we believe is FRS102 compliant. So expect everything to kick off again if we go with option 2 for the restated accounts… I had a feeling we'd be exploring a nonlinear option. It'll be interesting to see how they're 'reliably' estimating values. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cool As Custard Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 Dont mess with Mel Carnero, DavesaRam and Elgin_Ram 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Ghost of Clough said: I had a feeling we'd be exploring a nonlinear option. It'll be interesting to see how they're 'reliably' estimating values. It's going to be a whole world of fun when we hand in P&S still not based on the same methodology as every other club.....i think certain circuits are going to be fried in certain boardrooms. It would come across as "taking the michael" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kennington Ram Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 Mel rinsing the incompetents at the EFL for one last time: Wish we hadn't been in this position but hopefully this is the beginning of the return from the brink. r_wilcockson and Mick Brolly 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: I had a feeling we'd be exploring a nonlinear option. It'll be interesting to see how they're 'reliably' estimating values. I half wonder if they’re going to do something like divide players up into whether they have potential resale value or not, and then do straight line for no resale value, and just backload the amortisation for the others (so do maybe 10% 20% 30% 40% per year over a 4 year contract). You don’t have to estimate anything then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 The EFL deserve circumcising! ? Ghost of Clough, The Scarlet Pimpernel, ck- and 8 others 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4ev6is Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 3 hours ago, Norman said: Screw the takeover, screw the embargo - as Sum 41 said, we're in too deep. Appeal the fine, sue the EFL for the time spent under embargo and being put at a competitive disadvantage, sue Gibson, sue the Wycombe chairman and play the youth players. Not really, accept and move on might be the best for the future if the club. Would love us to go after them, though. I would now if I was mel for damages and slander towards the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: The EFL deserve circumcising! ? Has Gibson accepted that when we sold Pride Park it wasn't against the rules, despite his vairious noises that it er, was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazloW Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 Not read the entire thread or reaction to this evening’s news, so this has probably already been said, but the EFL do come out of this - from their statement - as looking particularly graceless, petty and ever so slightly childish. Don’t suppose we’re going to get away scot free as the resubmission of the accounts will probably open a new can of worms, but at least we know what division we’ll be in, which is a tiny bit of light in otherwise pitch dark days. r_wilcockson, Gee SCREAMER !!, Indy and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 6 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: The EFL deserve circumcising! ? I don't think any of us could have foreskin this development hintonsboots, ck-, RadioactiveWaste and 5 others 3 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 3 hours ago, Rambalin said: Flood Alert A flood alert has been issued for the Bristol Area due to Mr Ploppy pants not having a big enough bucket to catch all his tears. Had to have a look. He's quite upset. He also seems to think Derby have missed HMRC payments. Not sure how he would know that, actually he wouldn't. Reckons he's coming to Pride Park next season with his mates. Could you imagine 3 hours in a car with him and his home made banner about amortisation. Leave him to it. Blokes the very height of sadness. Pearl Ram, TheresOnlyWanChope, Reggie Greenwood and 2 others 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 18 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: I half wonder if they’re going to do something like divide players up into whether they have potential resale value or not, and then do straight line for no resale value, and just backload the amortisation for the others (so do maybe 10% 20% 30% 40% per year over a 4 year contract). You don’t have to estimate anything then. Is that reliably estimating values though? We nownhave the benefit of hindsight, knowing what our budgets for each season are. I'm sure we'll do everything we can to be as close to the limits as possible in each season, to increase our budget as much as possible for the current and future seasons ? RadioactiveWaste and Carnero 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4ev6is Posted July 2, 2021 Share Posted July 2, 2021 I love to see gibson face from it now knowing he has lost the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now