Jump to content

JfR

Member
  • Posts

    2,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About JfR

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Here's hoping Shrewsbury can pull off a bit of an upset in midweek 🤞
  2. I find this especially amusing considering that the EFL's "expert witness" in their case against us for our stadium sale had claimed to have conducted a "stadium valuation" for Chelsea that turned out to have been an assessment of the "capital values of hotel sites" at Chelsea, so the asset they're selling here could very well have been valued by the EFL's witness against us. Funny how things seem to go in circles.
  3. JfR

    Ben Pringle

    I hope they launch a Scottish sister club called Fleetwood Mac
  4. Forest 1 down, Luton 1 up Won't count my chickens before they hatch, but it's a good start
  5. JfR

    Gary Rowett

    Wish Tony Mowbray the best with whatever he's having to deal with. He always seemed a good sort.
  6. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/sport/football/article/football-nottingham-forest-points-deduction-decision-financial-rules-gkfpnjmcg "An appeal by Nottingham Forest against the four-point deduction imposed for breaching the Premier League’s financial rules would run the risk of the sanction being increased." Is there any way to launch an appeal on behalf of someone else? If not, is anyone able to forge Marinakis' handwriting?
  7. By my count, that'll make him the 6th person to have managed them this season Eustace > Rooney > Spooner (interim) > Mowbray > Venus (while Mowbray's been on sick leave) > Rowett
  8. Forest's claims about being unfairly disadvantaged as a promoted Championship club would certainly hold more weight if they didn't also come out against distributing more pay to EFL clubs less than a week ago: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13188487/Premier-League-clubs-shot-EFL-deal.html
  9. Pretty sure that's the Everton fans...
  10. So having read through the decision, I think this works as a quick summary of why it was 4 points: Commission found that the "entry point" for any "significant" breach of the spending limits is 3 points In Everton's case this was increased up to 6 points for two aggravating factors: One being the scale of the breach (£19.5m, or 19% of their threshold), the other being that they had been found in their appeal to have supplied some "incorrect" information to the Premier League (which the Premier League originally presented as Everton "misleading" them. The finding of "incorrect" rather than "misleading" is important). In Forest's case, the aggravating factor was solely the scale of their breach, albeit this was both numerically and proportionally much higher than Everton's (£34.5m, or 57% of their threshold; alternatively, a breach 77% higher than Everton's). While the Premier League argued that this should correspond to a 5 point increase in the deduction, raising the points deduction up to a total of 8 points, the commission disagreed. This was in large part because the Premier League has no "fixed formula" for points deductions based on the size of a breach, and that an insolvency event would result in a 9 point deduction. There's a lot of explanation for why they came to this decision, but effectively, the commission concluded that, as Forest's breach was a "significant" breach not a "major" breach (i.e. one involving insolvency), the absolute upper threshold that any club who makes a "significant" breach would expect (without major and unusual aggravating circumstances) would be 8 points, as insolvency would represent the absolute worst case scenario for failing to adhere to profit and sustainability. They also concluded that Forest were unlikely to be the largest ever Premier League breach, and therefore they shouldn't be punished at the absolute highest end of the scale. Instead, the commission decided that the level of breach should correspond to a 3 point increase to the deduction, raising to total deduction to 6 points. Forest were found to have had two mitigating factors in their favour: that they admitted the breach early on, and that they complied with the Premier League. As such, the commission reduced their deduction by 2 points, taking the total deduction to 4 points. So, basically, you can overspend by as much as you want in the Premier League, and as long as you don't do anything too egregious alongside it, you'll lose no more than 8 points.
  11. Did have to smirk at this. Doesn't exactly bode well for the quality of these commissions if they couldn't even correctly figure out 38*3:
  12. https://www.premierleague.com/news/3936397 "Nottingham Forest was referred to an independent Commission on 15 January, following an admission by the club that it had breached the relevant PSR threshold of £61 million by £34.5 million" How the hell is a £34.5m breach a 4 point deduction!?
  13. Athletic reporting it should be Monday
×
×
  • Create New...