Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Carl Sagan said:

In the previous 1073 pages this may have been covered, but why don't the administrators simply give a final deadline for bidders (a sort of sealed bids scenario) and then take the highest, name them as the preferred bidder and proceed with the sale?

I think they would if they could,these potential buyers are business men at the end of the day and will not pay over the odds for a club that will be potentially in a lower division,if we were relegated by now the deal would of been done and dusted for sure by now,however the longer this drags on the less players we will have at our disposal as most are out of contract at the end of this season and with no buyer in place means no new contacts for them,these are dark times indeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

HMRC will be in the driving seat on this one as the main creditor and a preferred one.  If agreements not reached with them it feeds down the chain and those with less debt and less chance of getting should the club liquidate will agree relatively easily.  4  years since I worked there  as I say with this level of liability - although its a rarity.  Based on this 35-40% would be enough with review  plan over 3 years to collect hopefully as much as possible 

Thanks for that and I agree that HMRC are very much the key creditors but, do we know the offer to them is in the range of 35-40%?
 

Also, again - apologies as no offence intended, but you’ve not worked there since the rules were changed and HMRC were promoted to preferred debtors have you? Maybe, they’re playing more hard ball now.

All I’m trying to say is, it may well be the reason for the delay, we don’t actually know it is Mel that is the cause for the delay - either in full or part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Carl Sagan said:

In the previous 1073 pages this may have been covered, but why don't the administrators simply give a final deadline for bidders (a sort of sealed bids scenario) and then take the highest, name them as the preferred bidder and proceed with the sale?

I Imagine if they did execute this plan the highest bid would mean -15 in league 1 and admins probably don’t want this on our record. They’re probably hoping we stay up so either the bids go up, other parties come in or -15 in championship it is. 
 
By trying to stay up we’ve probably done ourselves more harm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tamworthram said:

Thanks for that and I agree that HMRC are very much the key creditors but, do we know the offer to them is in the range of 35-40%?
 

Also, again - apologies as no offence intended, but you’ve not worked there since the rules were changed and HMRC were promoted to preferred debtors have you? Maybe, they’re playing more hard ball now.

All I’m trying to say is, it may well be the reason for the delay, we don’t actually know it is Mel that is the cause for the delay - either in full or part.

You'll appreciate I can't go into this much more.  I don't work there now but others do who  have an idea under the current regs,.  I'd back my experience of over 20 years working in taxation -with some statistical work outside for a period- to know regardless.  Mel needs to pay off that loan and take a rent on the ground, not rely on the new buyer to fund his accord by the back door - always the showman 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tamworthram said:

How can Q force bidders to increase their offer, creditors to reduce their demands, Mel to reach agreement regarding the stadium or whatever is causing the hold up?

Well is the fans need to increase the pressure on admin now and help rooney out on this we need to make our feeling clear towards them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, AndyinLiverpool said:

And all the time the value of the club goes down.

Which is a perfect scenario if you want to get the club on cheap, same goes for the ground. The power is with any potential buyers right now.

Q wanted a bidding war, unfortunately as our chances of championship survival get slimmer, it’s more like a reverse auction, with the bids getting cheaper. Highly doubt they will get much future business, after the “pigs ear” they have made of this process; as I’ve said elsewhere though, they are not to blame for the situation we’re in, just ineffective in fans ambitions to remain in this division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have I mis-read that Q Statement/open letter, or were there a lot more mentions of "You" and "Your" this time?  Are they beginning to distance themselves from the club a bit more, now that their freebie Directors Seats are starting to look less attractive as each game passes?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been said by several, in defence of the Administrators, that they cannot force the interested parties to increase their bids.

Fair enough. Perfectly true.

But they have declined bids from Kirchner and the Binnies that, to me, didn't seem that far away from the reported asking price. So, even if it had meant the extra 15 point deduction for not being able to pay the debts in full, at least we would have new owners and a future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...