Jump to content

Keogh Sacked


Nuwtfly

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Rolleston said:

So, were Cocu and his staff at this team building event?

Either way it's hard to understand why they weren't there or if they were there how they allowed the evening to turn out like it did.

They weren't there. They stayed away as it was 'team building' for the squad, okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Rolleston said:

This all comes down to weak management. I'm afraid we need another manager who will instill some discipline and respect for this club. We are going in the wrong direction.

What a pathetic comment, can’t believe a so called fan can actually come up with such absolute crap.

Absolutely astounding, god knows what direction you would prefer, no wonder this forum is held in such low esteem!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said:

Yeah that's speculation isn't it, or are you ITK?

No,  exactly why i said it was speculation,  you are just trying to confuse me. ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rolleston said:

Cocu seems to be getting off very lightly with this, where was he when all this was happening?

In bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Rolleston said:

Cocu seems to be getting off very lightly with this, where was he when all this was happening?

I assume he was at home. The players in question refused the taxis on offer and decided to stay out drinking - nothing to do with Cocu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rolleston said:

So, were Cocu and his staff at this team building event?

Either way it's hard to understand why they weren't there or if they were there how they allowed the evening to turn out like it did.

Have you ever been a manager of people?  If so did you know their whereabouts 24 hours a day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rosythram said:

What a pathetic comment, can’t believe a so called fan can actually come up with such absolute crap.

Absolutely astounding, god knows what direction you would prefer, no wonder this forum is held in such low esteem!

No its not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, reverendo de duivel said:

By who?

 

It's a comment often posted on the Derby reddit page, which is no vision of beauty itself. People prefer different things, but there are plenty of active users on here that suggest its only a bitter few who dislike it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rolleston said:

I'm not suggesting that you know what your staff are up to 24 hours a day. Surely as an employee you know what is expected of you when you are out on company business. Money dosn't protect you from the law, just ask all those who got caught.

But it was after. I am not condoning what they did but if you manage people,  take them for a beer,  then they go out after and get wrecked is it your fault? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not a solicitor, but I have had some experience with contracts of employment – although, I’m far from being an expert in employment law.

In the vast majority of contracts, for jobs that rely on some level of physical “activity”, there will be stipulations around what would constitute dismissal based on injuring oneself.  It may/may not specifically be listed as “gross misconduct” and could, for example, fall under “gross negligence leading to an inability to perform the role assigned”.  This could, essentially, read as the same thing, but it is less ambiguous, as gross misconduct could cover a wide range of things outside of the ability to perform a role. 

Roles this would apply to would range from builders, to highway maintenance, to where driving is an essential part of the role, etc.

Now, there would be degrees of circumstance to what would constitute gross misconduct/negligence.  If you are a builder and were, for example, to break a leg playing football, whilst you would be unable to perform your role for a period of time, unless specifically listed in your contract, it would be unlikely to be judged as gross misconduct/negligence – although your contract terms may/may not see you receive a lower level of sick-pay.  However, if you were to break a leg (or worse) as a result of a drink driving incident (seems relevant!), then the likelihood is that this would fall under gross misconduct/negligence and there would be grounds for dismissal under the terms of your contract.

Without having access to the full detail of the relevant investigations, I can only base my thoughts on the topic at hand, from the information that is in the public domain.

Lawrence and Bennett, we are told, were fined the maximum allowable under the terms of their contract.  To me (and I may be wide of the mark!), that would suggest that they were not deemed to be guilty of gross misconduct, but simply a high level of misconduct under the rules of the club, and thus were fined and allowed to continue with their employment.  The fact that they were not injured in the incident probably (but not certainly) played a role in this, given they are still able to fulfill the primary role of their contract – i.e. available to play football as and when required.

Keogh, on the other hand, is clearly unable to fulfill the primary role of his contract.  The fact that this has occurred due to rank stupidity, is certainly acceptable as a means for gross misconduct.  Without having any knowledge of Keogh’s contract, or club rules/statutes on what constitutes gross misconduct, it is impossible to say if his inability to play is the primary reason?  I would be surprised, however, if it was not deemed to be a significant factor in any decision the club has made, alongside the fact that due to the nature of how the injuries occurred, it is highly unlikely that any insurance the club would have would cover any wages/cost. 

It would, in my opinion, go some way to explaining the difference in the outcomes of the 3 players disciplinary processes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Paul71 said:

Depends, you don't know what his mortgage is

Not really, he's never going to get a better offer.

It's take £3k and downsize to a smaller mansion, make a fraction of that as a pundit and live in a normal house or get a job as a big brother contestant impersonator and live in a flat above a chippy.

Richard Keogh, the first footballer to lose a million pounds when his teammate hit the post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RadioactiveWaste said:

Bring back nigel Pearson. No wait...

But clearly they've been trusted too much (culture difference?)

It’s actually well known in the industry that Nigel Pearson is a pussy

Can’t deal with confrontation without his back room staff with him and in staff to player situations

He just can’t stand doing media work so people think he’s this tough guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CornwallRam said:

Not really, he's never going to get a better offer.

It's take £3k and downsize to a smaller mansion, make a fraction of that as a pundit and live in a normal house or get a job as a big brother contestant impersonator and live in a flat above a chippy.

Richard Keogh, the first footballer to lose a million pounds when his teammate hit the post. 

I’d argue a lot of them did when Martin struck it at Wembley… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...