trappatoni Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 14 hours ago, David said: Not heard that one, although his contract does expire in the summer, 2+2=6 maybe, although it’s plausible. Why would that matter though (not suggesting you are saying it should) - if anything if you were out of contract and presumably looking for a move or a pay rise you'd be more motivated. In fact if we've dropped a player for not signing a contract that comes across like a punishment and can't be good for morale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 On 28/01/2024 at 22:39, Blondest Goat said: Exactly like Wildsmith at Leyton Orient for their disallowed goal. Don't think dealing with crosses is either keepers greatest strength. Pretty obvious Warne prefers Vickers so any hope people have of Joe returning is going to be in vain unless he gets injured or has a mare. Not forgetting Wigans 2nd goal on the opening game of the season 😮 Finding a keeper who doesn't make a mistake is like finding a pile of horse sh!t right under that rocking horse you bought your child for Xmas, Then eating your Xmas meal only to find hens teeth in your Chicken dinner. Tamworthram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 15 minutes ago, trappatoni said: Why would that matter though (not suggesting you are saying it should) - if anything if you were out of contract and presumably looking for a move or a pay rise you'd be more motivated. In fact if we've dropped a player for not signing a contract that comes across like a punishment and can't be good for morale. There could be a line of thinking in that why give game time to a player that doesn't see his future here, when I have one possibly equally as good here that does. The counter to that is obviously play your best players, which Wildsmith is, although it would be how Warne judges Vickers abilities as a keeper. Let's not forget though, we're just talking about possible scenarios, not looking to start rumours or claim any kind of source to this. Wildsmith could be more than happy here and this is way off from what's going on. Should be a question put forward to Warne though, not sure if it has, but dropping your number 1 doesn't usually go unquestioned even when there is an obviously drop in form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSD Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Two of the usual back four being out, plus Cashin having his player of the month curse, feel sorry for Vickers. Let's see him with our full strength defence. Tamworthram and Premier ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 or... perhaps Vickers hasn't done anything bad enough for Warne, to warrant him losing his place to Wildsmith? He certainly hasn't in my eyes, even if he doesn't exactly fill me with as much confidence as Wildsmith. DiggerB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Could he be one of the players who trigger an extension if he plays more games? Im sure Warne said something about this in an interview. at the end of the day Wildsmith is too inconsistent to be first choice in the championship so would make sense if we don’t want to extend his contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 10 minutes ago, davenportram said: Could he be one of the players who trigger an extension if he plays more games? Im sure Warne said something about this in an interview. at the end of the day Wildsmith is too inconsistent to be first choice in the championship so would make sense if we don’t want to extend his contract I suspect it's the likely scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Unless it's a ridiculous hike, why would anyone not want to extend Wildsmith?! RoyMac5 and Carl Sagan 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 23 hours ago, inter politics said: Unless it's a ridiculous hike, why would anyone not want to extend Wildsmith?! Not good enough for the championship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 minute ago, davenportram said: Not good enough for the championship Like most goalies he'll have 10 games looking like he's a 50 million starter for Madrid, 10 where he looks championship standard then 3 where he looks like a bloke whose turned up on a Sunday after 10 pints in the division ten taverns league and you won 't see them for 3 months. It's rare to have a consistent keeper. People rave about Pickford half the time he looks s****. JTLGamer13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaside Ram Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 I take it all back ! Wildsmith is a Jeffin liability, Farkin idiot , Bring in Josh Vickers , bring in bloody John Vicars if you like , or even the Vicar of Effin Dibley !!! Just axe him NOW cstand and Abu Derby 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRams10 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Clearly hasn’t learnt his lesson from Oxford away, new number 1 is as important as a number 9 in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 3 minutes ago, SuperRams10 said: Clearly hasn’t learnt his lesson from Oxford away, new number 1 is as important as a number 9 in the summer. Yes so it seems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 9 minutes ago, Seaside Ram said: I take it all back ! Wildsmith is a Jeffin liability, Farkin idiot , Bring in Josh Vickers , bring in bloody John Vicars if you like , or even the Vicar of Effin Dibley !!! Just axe him NOW Its what you get when you lose confindce because the manager dropped him! Archied, bcnram and The Running Man 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 3 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Its what you get when you lose confindce because the manager dropped him! More like not knowing who is where, doing what, in the defence in front of you. bcnram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Idiotic challenge you could see him making several seconds before he did. Bradley did fantastically to head it straight to them and kick it straight to them before getting done for pace in behind for it too. Truly top notch play. Andicis, MaltRam, Jubbs and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 9 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Its what you get when you lose confindce because the manager dropped him! He did exactly the same thing at Oxford before he was dropped. Absolutely brain dead. Andicis 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiggerB Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 11 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Its what you get when you lose confindce because the manager dropped him! He was dropped because of a run of sub-par performances and a lack of composure in the 2nd minute of the Oxford game. It doesn’t appear he’s learned a great deal on reflection! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRams10 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Think we are now beginning to see the reason he was 3rd choice at Wednesday, number of clean sheets is impressive but largely down to the way we set up under Warne & he is a decent shot stopper (like you’d expect most goalkeepers to be) 😕 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 15 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: More like not knowing who is where, doing what, in the defence in front of you. Yeah that's probably what caused him to make a completely reckless challenge that he had no need to make. Andicis and RoyMac5 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now