RammingStone66 Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 55 minutes ago, Sparkle said: The EFL can back down and quickly they can also threaten to charge both parasite clubs with acting against the spirit of the league in fact they can impose anything they like based on our experiences True but you know they arnt going to do that without a lot more pressure. National media is not on our side generally, sky Everytime they speak they say the word cheating 15 times ? Simon Jordan didn't exactly do us an favours either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewetube Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: This arbitrary deadline of 1st Feb strikes me as another example of the EFL trying to bully and blackmail the club. If the club can't provide evidence of sufficient funding to see us through until the end of the season it doesn't actually mean we won't be able to complete the season. We just can't prove it by the deadline they want to impose. Who would it benefit if we were expelled? Certainly not the creditors, players, staff, fans or other clubs. Not even the EFL. I can see the argument for keeping the transfer embargo in place but not expulsion. Who would it benefit? I'd suggest pubehead and ambulance chaser's egos plus all the clubs picking up all our former players and our relegation rivals. It's dog eat dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarterForTen Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: I think he's just Bitter Yeah, I've heard he's a 'glass half empty' kind of guy Ram-Alf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eatonram Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 As Boro and Wickham realise, it costs and risks nothing to lodge a "claim" with the EFL. It would really apply pressure IMO if we lodged a claim for £51m against QPR. It would be obvious how we have reached the figure, everyone would draw the same conclusion, that there will be a chain reaction if the Parasite claims are successful. What do we have to lose at this stage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 1 hour ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: Not at all. I'm referring to the guy on Twitter who suggested we all email our DCFC stories directly to Carl Jackson and the like. Yes, I agree. I was heartened to read the reply from Quantuma this morning, but it's not a good idea for us all to be emailing stories to them. The request from the MPs was to tag them in on Twitter. Despite being given an example of what to do, many frns have either tagged no-one, tagged all the wrong people or gone direct. It's like trying to herd cats! Comrade 86, i-Ram, CBRammette and 3 others 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Loved this from @Owen87ITK. He's one of us, when it all boils down to it. Ramslad1992, David Graham Brown, Black ('n' White) Sheep and 8 others 3 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 22 minutes ago, LauraH said: Possibly clumsy wording here from Dawes. What's he talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewetube Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 I may be petty minded and vindictive, but I thought yesterday it would have been good if Q had put out a rebuttal to the WW and MB statement/ radio, where they were happy to refer to us as cheats, with Q solely referring to them as the parasites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, AndyinLiverpool said: What's he talking about? He has 'bid' for an interview with Quantuma, that's all. AndyinLiverpool and RadioactiveWaste 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plusi_Ram Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 5 minutes ago, AndyinLiverpool said: What's he talking about? I think the "bid" he's referring to means that they (BBC Derby) made a "bid" to speak to the administrators. Pretty poor choice of words. AndyinLiverpool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewetube Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 9 minutes ago, angieram said: Yes, I agree. I was heartened to read the reply from Quantuma this morning, but it's not a good idea for us all to be emailing stories to them. The request from the MPs was to tag them in on Twitter. Despite being given an example of what to do, many frns have either tagged no-one, tagged all the wrong people or gone direct. It's like trying to herd cats! Dairy cats are the worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 9 minutes ago, Ewetube said: I may be petty minded and vindictive, but I thought yesterday it would have been good if Q had put out a rebuttal to the WW and MB statement/ radio, where they were happy to refer to us as cheats, with Q solely referring to them as the parasites. They don't really need to - if we still had owners in charge, they would almost certainly have put out a a statement, but the administrators aren't in the business of managing public perceptions - they will follow the letter of the law (which seems to be on our side) and hopefully putt to two chancers and their mates in the EFL back in their respective boxes (which may be one box given the apparent collusion between the three parties....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 10 minutes ago, angieram said: He has 'bid' for an interview with Quantuma, that's all. I was all fired up for the radio Derby takeover as well. GlastoEls and JoetheRam 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, angieram said: He has 'bid' for an interview with Quantuma, that's all. Apologies for my angry post before. I find it hard, no impossible, to believe Dawes used the word 'bid' accidentally when people normally 'request' an interview. Edited January 19, 2022 by RoyMac5 RadioactiveWaste, Andicis, r_wilcockson and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewetube Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 20 minutes ago, angieram said: He has 'bid' for an interview with Quantuma, that's all. £8 million would be a useful bid RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 43 minutes ago, StarterForTen said: The 'bid' to make a statement I presume That does sound like comms speak for Radio Derby putting a bid in to interview Quantuma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 48 minutes ago, StaffsRam said: What bid? Does he mean request? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBRammette Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 27 minutes ago, Ewetube said: I may be petty minded and vindictive, but I thought yesterday it would have been good if Q had put out a rebuttal to the WW and MB statement/ radio, where they were happy to refer to us as cheats, with Q solely referring to them as the parasites. My dad always said "Never lower yourself to their level. Just do it properly and get them where it hurts". Has been correct throughout life Premier ram and Ewetube 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Ed Dawes is so dense light bends around him. That tweet is absolutely insane under the circumstances! TheSlate, RadioactiveWaste, ThePrisoner and 6 others 2 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Latest on the radio Derby bid: Andy Twigg to be CEO Sally Pepper to be football director Money believed to have come from crypto Radio Derby bid team confident that Ed Dawes will act as legal council after his interview with Couhig JoetheRam, Ewetube, Abu Derby and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now