Crewton Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 1 hour ago, RAM1966 said: He will have no option if it forms part of the lease agreement... That seems unlikely when DCFC have technically defaulted on the lease by not paying rent. A bloke who's waiting for someone to buy his stadium before he'll pay the compensation HE'S agreed with Steve Gibson is not going to be paying for the pitch to be renovated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RipleyRich Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 2 hours ago, CornwallRam said: I think that the Buchanan extension is very significant. Our embargo was so rigid that we couldn't even extend Jagielka. Something had obviously changed dramatically. The best case is that the takeover is complete and they are just waiting to announce it. However, the worst case is that the EFL have relaxed the restrictions in order that we will be able to field a team, even if we're still in adminstration - presumably subject to Quantuma finding the cash. Not perfect, but at least we would still have a club next season. I also wonder if its something to do with dropping into League 1. Maybe because P&S no longer applies to us, some of the restrictions and punishments don't apply. The Buchanan situation is very different to Jagielka. Jags contract expired ( or would have done) The option on Buchanan forms part of his existing contract which I don't believe is affected by the embargo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Oldben said: Succeeding in League one Spend Big? Spend Smart? Focus On The Academy? You've got the general idea, but you're looking at it the wrong way. Getting recruitment right is one of the key ingredients contributing towards success in L1. But, you have to look at the squad we have (or at least expect to have) and work from there. As things stand, we will have a very young squad, with a couple of players in their final year or two as a pro. Recruitment will therefore heavily target that gap in the middle (aged 23-30), with the odd exception outside of that range, such as Flint. Requirement number two is filling in the positions where we have obvious gaps - defence, wings and CF. Budget would be requirement number three. Can we get a player of sufficient quality, who meets req 1 and 2, for nothing. If not, then it means spending some cash, and there has to have a good ROI on the player. The academy should always be a priority - we want that constant stream of players coming through. There squads at U18 and U23 have been decimated, through sales or promotion to the first team. However, there are still a few gems who will be ready to step up in the next year or two. We will also be recruiting a large number of players into those squad this summer. I wouldn't be surprised to see another Plange or Ebiowei come in, then force their way into the first team this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 36 minutes ago, Gaspode said: Given that we have half a team under contract for next season, would you rather the club allowed an Engalnd U21 international to simply walk away at the end of his contract? The 'no brainer' bit is extending his contract and either playing him next season or else selling him for a relatively decent fee..... This. Even if Buchanan is on the way out at least this way we get paid. If he stays it's one less position to worry about in the rebuild. jimtastic56 and Gaspode 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 3 days (and whatever is left of today) for the stadium deal to be complete. Hopefully we will have more than just the jubilee to celebrate next week. jimtastic56 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 13 minutes ago, RipleyRich said: The Buchanan situation is very different to Jagielka. Jags contract expired ( or would have done) The option on Buchanan forms part of his existing contract which I don't believe is affected by the embargo Rooney said a couple of months ago that we couldn't take up the option on Buchanan because of the embargo. jimtastic56 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 5 minutes ago, CornwallRam said: Rooney said a couple of months ago that we couldn't take up the option on Buchanan because of the embargo. Tbf he has also said the takeover should be done in the next 24/48 hrs, about 24/48 times. Topram and CornwallRam 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 22 minutes ago, CornwallRam said: Rooney said a couple of months ago that we couldn't take up the option on Buchanan because of the embargo. Something has clearly changed behind the scenes as we now appear to have more flexibility - whether (as has been suggested) that's due to the EFL realising that we won't be able to field a team next season or whether it's to do with the takeover, we'll probably never know..... I know nuffin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4ev6is Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 We got until 31st may tie it all up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 5 minutes ago, B4ev6is said: We got until 31st may tie it all up. Friday. According to Alan Nixon. I wouldnt normally go with what he says, but he does have the EFL and Kirchners teams in his ear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Gaspode said: Something has clearly changed behind the scenes as we now appear to have more flexibility - whether (as has been suggested) that's due to the EFL realising that we won't be able to field a team next season or whether it's to do with the takeover, we'll probably never know..... Perhaps as simple as Kirchner has signed a deal to buy the Club (whether he does or doesn't complete is another matter) and is funding us? Edited May 24, 2022 by RoyMac5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 1 minute ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Friday. According to Alan Nixon. I wouldnt normally go with what he says, but he does have the EFL and Kirchners teams in his ear. The EFL themselves had stated the 31st. Check here. Arsene Titman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 6 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: The EFL themselves had stated the 31st. Check here. Surely though it’s a bit of a false deadline. if CK isn’t quite ready to complete on the Asset Purchase or finalise a lease on the stadium and perhaps needs another week (where have we heard that before) they’ll give an extension provided there is a reasonable expectation that both will then be completed. jono 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 18 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Friday. According to Alan Nixon. I wouldnt normally go with what he says, but he does have the EFL and Kirchners teams in his ear. Getting exciting isn't it..... MackworthRamIsGod and jimtastic56 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 jono, jimtastic56, Derby4Me and 1 other 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 3 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: We didn't start last season in administration. EFL rules allow us to stay in administration whilst staying in the League until March, superseded by another EFL rule which requires clubs to prove they can see out the full season. Essentially, EFL need proof a takeover will take place before the season starts, but we then have a number of months to ensure it is completed. GOC the “rule” that we can’t start a season without proof of funds that we can finish the season is news to me. Is this another hidden rule , as you say. if so is there another rule that says you can’t sell season tickets? So how can you show proof of funds without any season ticket money? it’s like the mad hatters tea party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick_d Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 56 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: The EFL themselves had stated the 31st. Check here. When are the wages due to be paid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase116 Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 I thought 31st may at latest was what was said? Maybe just maybe it’s a Friday announcement on the stadium being done and us coming out of administration after a meeting with efl on Thursday ( there usual meeting day) ???♂️?♂️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 36 minutes ago, hintonsboots said: Is that a new one Hinton ? SaffyRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 3 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: No idea. It's another in a very long list of rules the EFL choose to keep hidden from the public They do this quite often to suit their agenda. RadioactiveWaste, kevinhectoring, angieram and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now