Tyler Durden Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Still heartening to see though that some organisations work on a Sunday..... maxjam, Dordogne-Ram, David Graham Brown and 5 others 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 33 minutes ago, angieram said: So everybody saying that the EFL couldn't interfere in the sale of the club were basically wrong? Only because they have changed their rules, Now I wonder why they changed their rules, Maybe receiving an email from a billionaire was the catalyst?♀️ Also and hopefully not the thought of one of the founder members going Pop? Indy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramos Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 whiteroseram, RoyMac5 and Derby4Me 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atherstoneram Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 9 minutes ago, CBX1985 said: Indeed that is a discussion. it is not a dichotomy - CK or nothing. The amount offered by CK may be illusionary. If it is, there was no real deal. The negotiation has to find an acceptable amount for both sides. We start again. MA has a infinitely stronger negotiating position. Creditors don't have a world of options in a business that has no assets to sell. It is not a discussion it's a fact,if a bidder doesn't offer enough to raise the club out of administration it doesn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elwood P Dowd Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 28 minutes ago, atherstoneram said: Doesn't really matter whether they are trying to put public pressure on or not. The real problem is the amount of debt and if nobody is willing to provide enough funds to lift the club out of administration then it won't happen. Having now read the EFLs statement which comes across as concern as to Derbys ability to fulfil next seasons fixtures I think the EFL is justified in voicing their concern. I think we all share the EFLs concern.? As long as the EFL comment only on the manner in which the Clubs current position interacts with the EFLs rules, that’s fine, if the EFL were to try and influence the Administration decision or process then, in my opinion, they would be over stepping the line. I am always weary when we come across “Reporters” post as they tend to put a dramatic slant on everything, good or bad. Edited June 12, 2022 by Elwood P Dowd RadioactiveWaste, RipleyRich and The Scarlet Pimpernel 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, Ramos said: Well thank god it’s no one who’s got an axe to grind with us… Edited June 12, 2022 by StaffsRam angieram, GenBr, i-Ram and 9 others 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 20 minutes ago, Tyler Durden said: Ummm what's stopping us playing the entirety of next season in administration? There's no rules about how long a club is allowed to be in administration for - look at Wigan, Portsmouth etc Why are the EFL suddenly getting all precious about us potentially going into next season in administration, they weren't particularly bothered about it for the past season. There is a limit of 18 months under EFL rules. That takes us through to March. We also gave to prove we can complete all 46 games next season (contradictory with the 18 mo the rule). Therefore, we have to prove a takeover will be completed by March at the very latest. Dordogne-Ram and Tyler Durden 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramos Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 This better explains the statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Ram Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Ramos said: Trevor Birch a chartered accountant. I had him down as a merchant banker. LeedsCityRam, angieram, Ilkestonian and 10 others 2 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May Contain Nuts Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 I'll take the 2 laughing reactions from Derby4Me and RoyMac5 as a solid endorsement of my post. Its a bit like when Angie likes or applauds your post, you know you're on the right track Same story when these two <redacted>s try to mock you ? Mostyn6, Comrade 86, Dordogne-Ram and 9 others 2 1 3 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaRam Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 13 minutes ago, Ramos said: I think it’s actually start one season. So you can go into admin after the first day of one season and start the next season in it. The challenge for us is, we need to come out of admin to sign anyone and offer contracts. If they lets us do those things in admin it make a mockery of the rules, simple as that. We can’t compete starting next season in admin we don’t have the players, so this has to get done and sorted for the fixtures announcement you’d assume so we can then spend 4 weeks mustering a playing squad together. Apologies you’re correct, I meant play in 2 but only start in 1 ? Wont let me edit it to put it right ?♂️ Ramos 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Mckram said: I worked for Mike Ashley for 5 years so can form my own opinion of him. Indeed but, literally, thousands of employees think negatively of his employ, whereas, literally, a handful of negative reviews do Slync have to turning against CK. Just saying you should judge them on the same merits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Ramarena said: To be fair I think everyone is well aware of Ashley’s employment “practices” Fair point, agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atherstoneram Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Next time a club gets in financial trouble then they don't appoint administrators then they just refer the matter to the EFL to sort out a new owner. Jeez!!!! David Graham Brown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 I heard a rumour Maisie Peters is now going to buy the club... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flying Fokker Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Elwood P Dowd said: Having now read the EFLs statement which comes across as concern as to Derbys ability to fulfil next seasons fixtures I think the EFL is justified in voicing their concern. I think we all share the EFLs concern.? As long as the EFL comment only on manner in which the Clubs current position interacts with the EFLs rules, that’s fine, if the EFL were to try and influence the Administration decision or process then, in my opinion, they would be over stepping the line. I am always weary when we come across “Reporters” post as they tend to put a dramatic slant on everything, good or bad. I agree, some may see this as the death knell for the club. However, I think this is the best thing that could happen at this critical point. They do not seem to have much confidence in the matter being resolved as it is. The administrator has to be neutral but those affected can make representations to them and therefore establish whether a said bidder is viable. With someone readily available to negotiate on behalf of the FA it is far better for all parties. I'm not aware of any other club that has had this provision. It may be last chance saloon for some, but I think this is positive news. Edited June 12, 2022 by Flying Fokker FlyBritishMidland, Dai Capp, Elwood P Dowd and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted McMinn Football Genius Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 33 minutes ago, Shipley Ram said: How does this demand for access to correspondence work with NDA's? It doesn’t, parameters and rules appear to be as fluid as ever (or made up as we go along) Dordogne-Ram and RadioactiveWaste 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC1388 Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 IslandExile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now