Ram-Alf Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 7 hours ago, B4ev6is said: It could be really also. Eggs act a mundo ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 6 hours ago, Grumpy Git said: It was prepared by the BBC "The Apprentice" candidates. Was it written in the back of an Arctic lorry? Animal is a Ram, Ellafella, MK-Ram and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriggRam Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 minute ago, GboroRam said: Was it written in the back of an Arctic lorry? By the lesser spotted penguin jimtastic56 and Animal is a Ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 8 hours ago, Sparkle said: Really - please let me know when Within the next ?? Days ? jimtastic56 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 Rams trust q and a seemed a bit depressing. Just waiting for Boro to respond , .. q position is club to club claims are not allowed, but no timetable , nothing we can do to stop players signing pre contract deals . have to sell young players due to current dire financial situation . Situation changed drastically from when they were 95% confident but still confident. ashley still in the frame but will still take 12 weeks to resolve even from when we name a Pb. meantime we are still losing money. Mel’s offer being challenged as not doable ( at least not directly) as it’s almost all the Club’s responsibility to stick to the FFP rules , not his directly. so how do we get out of this mess? jimtastic56 and The Scarlet Pimpernel 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarInToTurnRed Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 (edited) 15 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: Sheff Utd 18/19 £21.3m loss £40.7m wage bill When you adjust for player promotion bonuses and addon transfer fees that were dependent on promotion what does that do to the figures? The bonuses for the players alone was 8 figures if memory serves correct. Edited February 8, 2022 by TooFarInToTurnRed Mistyped number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, CBRammette said: I thought the minutes seemed more candid than usual, less edited and careful, saying it like it is, so probably why seemed more depressing. It was very clearly stated the claims and their effect on everything are the issue, nothing else which I liked with other side always trying to make out it is more than one issue. Also liked statement about what efl not allowing, never been seen in however many years of insolvency law etc. Also had spoken with sports minister etc. generally thought the minutes were much more informative than over-edited careful previous ones Might you share the RamsTrust minutes for me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronRam 140.6 Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 11 hours ago, Mr. P said: Gotta be used at Boro away ??? Brilliant. rammieib, r_wilcockson and Premier ram 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 (edited) Edited February 8, 2022 by RoyMac5 Premier ram, IslandExile, StarterForTen and 8 others 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 13 minutes ago, i-Ram said: Might you share the RamsTrust minutes for me? They are here: https://ramstrust.org.uk/wp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC27 Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 I find it very difficult to see what the admin are actually doing. They have had three credible bidders/interested parties since November/December. The legal claims have been there since the beginning. We are now into the beginning of Feb?! MM has even offered to get rid of the big obstacle that was in there way. After reading the q&a they (imo) alluded to more obstacles they can use to ramp up their remuneration. They have said in the past they are willing to work night and day to get this through but so far all I can see is hot air and not a lot of substance. It is still my opinion that MM is still pulling the strings in this whole situation. Hence why Steve Gibson is so hell bent on suing us. metalsheep02 and Dean (hick) Saunders 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 How come the minutes have less detail in than the notes sent out to ramstrust members? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 38 minutes ago, CBRammette said: I thought the minutes seemed more candid than usual, less edited and careful, saying it like it is, so probably why seemed more depressing. It was very clearly stated the claims and their effect on everything are the issue, nothing else which I liked with other side always trying to make out it is more than one issue. Also liked statement about what efl not allowing, never been seen in however many years of insolvency law etc. Also had spoken with sports minister etc. generally thought the minutes were much more informative than over-edited careful previous ones Yes as you say that's maybe why they seemed a bit depressing. Even the bit about having confidential meetings and one of the parties leaking stuff to the media. I know it has been going on, EFL implicated by Morris and you wouldn't trust Gibson with anything. They are all such a bunch of Bamfords who just seem determined too wreck us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBRammette Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 33 minutes ago, i-Ram said: Might you share the RamsTrust minutes for me? Arent they on here? Sorry assumed they were i-Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 hours ago, Gritstone Ram said: Why would anyone guarantee something they don’t have control of. If MM indemnified the club he wouldn’t control its defence. Any new owner wouldn’t want to spend much on defending the case because it wouldn’t matter if they lost. The only way it could be done as a way out is how MM said if that is possible. Good point. The agreement needs 2 key things. 1 Exactly as you say, MM would need ‘conduct of the action’. So he would call the shots and have access to all club information he requires for the defence 2 the buyer would need assurances about his ability to pay. You might say, well he’s so wealthy... But the indemnity arrangements could be in place for years. So it would probably need some sort of security, maybe a bank guarantee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 6 minutes ago, CBRammette said: Arent they on here? Sorry assumed they were Yeah I would have thought someone from Ramstrust would have posted them here I must have seen them somewhere else twitter or something but thanks to Brailsford for posting them here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretDave Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 11 hours ago, Mr. P said: This time next year Rooney, we'll have a preferred bidder. Donnyram, Chester40, ck- and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarInToTurnRed Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 16 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: Sheff Utd 18/19 £21.3m loss £40.7m wage bill Indy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: Yeah I would have thought someone from Ramstrust would have posted them here I must have seen them somewhere else twitter or something but thanks to Brailsford for posting them here. I have added them to the daily updates thread now but didn't do so last night as they are exactly the same as those David added from BAWT. Even got the same formatting. Agreed by the administrators. i-Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said: Good point. The agreement needs 2 key things. 1 Exactly as you say, MM would need ‘conduct of the action’. So he would call the shots and have access to all club information he requires for the defence 2 the buyer would need assurances about his ability to pay. You might say, well he’s so wealthy... But the indemnity arrangements could be in place for years. So it would probably need some sort of security, maybe a bank guarantee Kevin is an alternative some form of assignment of a right of action? As I posted earlier it seems DCFC would have a cause for action against Morris for breach of contract. Could they not assign that right to Boro or Wycombe . I don't now if that is possible or advisable but there must be a way out of this logjam. The indemnity from Morris may be fine if that worrks except it keeps DCFC in the loop and prolongs uncertainty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now