Jump to content

v QPR (H) Match Thread


peachmyster

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 558
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, Squid said:

Risky, however I’m confident.

We’ve got the attacking personnel to bring the 3 points home.

Marriott & Waggy up top is something that should deffo be tried more.

Both lacking form they’ve got to wear their heart on their sleeve.

If one of them starts slacking bring on Whittaker for the extra energy.

Great to see the 3 at the back, Bogle being given chance to move forward more.

Malone back in the team which is great.

Tough as nails Wisdom back in the team too.

Really happy with this lineup and starting to feel the confidence more, hopefully Cocuball pays off today!☺️

 

Come on you ramssss

Bring the 3 points home....need to get my skates on and get down to Loftus Road for KO!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sage said:

Why have we made wholesale changes for a home game?

We need 3 at the back in away games, but we have just won 5 on the trot at home. 

 

Yes, agree completely.

There isn’t much creativity in this team, looks like 6 potential defenders ?

Against QPR at home you would expect at least one more attacking player.

Oh well, COY? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sage said:

Why have we made wholesale changes for a home game?

We need 3 at the back in away games, but we have just won 5 on the trot at home. 

 

I think the system change is a result of Shinnie's injury; we didn't look all that balanced against Preston, especially in the second half. And especially not against Fulham

As for the changes to personnel; if players are good at home but awful away, you can't drop them after playing well at home; if you also didn't drop them after awful away performances because they've played well in past home games they never lose their place despite being crap in half of all games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SaintRam said:

I think the system change is a result of Shinnie's injury; we didn't look all that balanced against Preston, especially in the second half. And especially not against Fulham

As for the changes to personnel; if players are good at home but awful away, you can't drop them after playing well at home; if you also didn't drop them after awful away performances because they've played well in past home games they never lose their place despite being crap in half of all games.

Fair enough but in the case of waggers he's been 'bank' home and away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong said:

Fair enough but in the case of waggers he's been bank home and away.

I definitely do not agree with starting Waghorn. Agreed. 

If he does well, great -  but he's done nothing to deserve this chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think today confirms the end of Patersons time with us. 

Not overly convinced if we have changed formation, need to do that away but we have won 5 on the spin at home. Interesting tonsee how we do line up though...could Bogle be on the wing? Maybe Wisdom could be at cdm with Bielik?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...