Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Carnero said:

I just searched for cskirchner earlier and re-followed him. That tweet was in the "tweets and replies" list.

Edit: added correct link for @angieram

Check out Chris Kirchner on Twitter.
Founder and CEO of https://t.co/Lyt2RljuQP https://twitter.com/cskirchner?s=20&t=okTb6c88sR3F3vCbUs_ifg

Thanks, but just takes me to his previous profile. Won't let me unfollow that, or follow this link. Strange!

Edited by angieram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, angieram said:

Thanks, but just takes me to his previous profile. Won't let me unfollow that, or follow this link. Strange!

Did the same for me, but I force closed the app on my phone, reopened and it popped up. 

If you're trying on a laptop/PC, try signing out and back in again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said:

Well, yeah. You’re obviously going to do more stupid stuff when you’re young than when you’re old.

But you’re also going to be far more comfortable using a platform that’s been around since you were a teenager than since you were middle-aged.

Bless you, you still think decision making improves with age, wisdom and experience.

I'm mid 40's, and have been suffering all day from being over-served at a gig last night.

The main difference in ages is being older gives you fewer opportunities to misbehave, and less powers of recovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rev said:

Bless you, you still think decision making improves with age, wisdom and experience.

I'm mid 40's, and have been suffering all day from being over-served at a gig last night.

The main difference in ages is being older gives you fewer opportunities to misbehave, and less powers of recovery.

Amen to that !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

It is beyond pathetic if Q are only now giving a period of exclusivity. They should be at the stage of appointing a PB who is contractually obliged to buy us subject only to EFL approval. BEYOND PATHETIC 

Not sure that Nixon is correct - I thought the £5m payment was designed to prevent the PB from walking away once they’d been selected….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, David Graham Brown said:

Just pointing out the subjectivity of some comments. I guess the amount of puritans that could buy us are a little thin on the ground?

The puritan we'd get would be Oliver Cromwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said:

You're one of the more knowledgeable posters when it comes to DCFC that I like to read, Now this is my ire, The dozy sod had posted some shyte over a decade ago, Yep we've all done/said stupid things in the past, But we're not in the firing line of buying DCFC he is, Has he come out and at least apologised...nowt yet so far, Instead he deletes his twitter account and opens another one.

Eating humble pie might not be his forte, But it will get all the noise that's coming our way slowly put to bed, He's either arrogant, Stupid, Pig headed or couldn't give a toss...apologise CK and be done with it.  

Maybe he should, but no-one clutching the curtains gave a toss when he was buying Preston, so I doubt it would make any difference to most of them if he did, though perhaps some of our own fans would appreciate it. 

Don't get the idea that I'm wildly enthusiastic about the guy, I just hate the stench of hypocrisy that spews out of social media at times like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...