Jump to content

Alan Nixon Breaks Silence on American Billionaire Bid


Kernow

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PistoldPete said:

I agree that morally he should not be pursuing Derby for anything. And he isn't even though  he is entitled to. Whereas  Gibson is pursuing money that he is not entitled to. I am not defending either of them but in terms of morality I think Gibson is lower down the food chain that's all.  

How can Morris the man who went to the football casino of life hoping to win the jackpot (Promotion to the PL), gamble everything, max out his credit card walk away with no debts, but expect to take a final payday?  Its morally corrupt and the EFL should close this loop.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Philmycock said:

I hear our supporters groups have approached Boro's and Wycombe's asking for their help, any news on this?

Representatives from BAWT have been in touch with the WWFC board regarding the ongoing legal case and have received a supportive and encouraging reply. Over the coming days, we hope to engage in a positive dialogue and explain the fears of #dcfc fans if the case is pursued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Woodley Ram said:

I think its about the season as a whole and that our overspending meant we were given an unfair advantage. The flaw is that could be argued for Reading and a load of others. If what they mean is that we should have received a points deduction last year then that is the remit of the EFL and their appeal format. 

it would be difficult to prove Gibson's or theirs but that's not the point. We cannot sell the club until its out of the way and the wait only damages us. So in essence what they are saying is give us some money and we will not take this further and you will survive if not you might go to the wall. They are opportunists and people should look at them as they are, two clubs scavenging off the bones of another to get a few quid. If not why didn't Wycombe go after Wednesday or Reading. Why didn't Gibson go after Villa, its because neither is in administration.

 

Because they submitted their yearly accounts into the EFL and we didn't submit any for 2 - 3 years, we don't know what was discovered if anything after the administrators submitted the outstanding accounts. Did MM have something to hide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Eatonram said:

Fair point Bobbster, in that no one can say for sure that QPR cost us promotion by their overspend......just as no one can say for sure that DCFC cost Boro promotion or Wycombe relegation by our much smaller overspend.....The difference is that DCFC are being sued and QPR were not, despite us argueably having a stronger case. What Galls is that we have been publicly lambasted far more than any other Club, denied Covid loans and now being sued for far more than the fine you actually paid and yet not a single Club, even previous transgressors like QPR have offered the slightest support. In fact what did your striker do at Pride Park a few weeks ago?

Football is now big business, we are the competition,do you really expect other clubs to show support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, atherstoneram said:

Football is now big business, we are the competition,do you really expect other clubs to show support.

It's more a question of "do you want to set a precedent?"

Can any club feel smugly secure in the current climate? There's quite a few reliant on someone buying their star player(s) every season in order to fall within FFP guidelines, many reliant on "soft"loans from individual owners, some owned by Chinese businessmen subject to the whims of their Government.

Biters occasionally get bit. 

I don't expect any of them to do anything but put the boot in, but I don't blame the supporters groups for asking the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atherstoneram said:

Because they submitted their yearly accounts into the EFL and we didn't submit any for 2 - 3 years, we don't know what was discovered if anything after the administrators submitted the outstanding accounts. Did MM have something to hide?

I've come to think the lack of accounts was to hide the fact he was unable/unwilling to support the club anymore from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Crewton said:

It's more a question of "do you want to set a precedent?"

Can any club feel smugly secure in the current climate? There's quite a few reliant on someone buying their star player(s) every season in order to fall within FFP guidelines, many reliant on "soft"loans from individual owners, some owned by Chinese businessmen subject to the whims of their Government.

Biters occasionally get bit. 

I don't expect any of them to do anything but put the boot in, but I don't blame the supporters groups for asking the question.

Wycombe -  get up by default, accuse us of cheating and have this beauty on record avoiding dropping down to there true station - sanctimonious shithouses.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/29475533

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ramswriter podcast said:

I spoke to Andy Appleby yesterday - confirmed him and Gadsby is false 

https://theramswriter.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/former-owners-will-not-join-forces/

 

Thanks for this update. Think most of us thought it was Nixon BS.

From your conversations with him, is Andy Appleby actually part of a consortium looking to buy the club and if successful would he be involved in some way post purchase, or is it very much in his capacity now as a fixer, his company with Sam Rush and Jez Moxey in putting the right bidders in touch with football clubs and helping broker a deal. I’m thinking it’s more the latter but I’ve seen various posters questioning or praising the virtues of Appleby as an owner and what would mean for the club going forward. Now they could’ve misunderstood the nature of his bid or something may have changed and he is now involved in a bid himself not bidding on someone’s behalf.

Any clarification (if you can provide it) would be awesome. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, atherstoneram said:

Football is now big business, we are the competition,do you really expect other clubs to show support.

Not support as I said later but I think it is in all the other Club’s interest that Clubs suing each other over rule breaches that have been dealt with by existing disciplinary procedures does not become part of the game due to this precedent. Your response will come as no surprise to anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RAM1966 said:

How can Morris the man who went to the football casino of life hoping to win the jackpot (Promotion to the PL), gamble everything, max out his credit card walk away with no debts, but expect to take a final payday?  Its morally corrupt and the EFL should close this loop.....

If you read it properly, no one is saying he is expecting an such thing (unless I’ve missed a post along the way).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...