Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said:

The main thing putting Barnsley at a competitive disadvantage is that they are absolutely awful at football. Their claim has no more merit than Wycombe or Boro against us, but the EFL are reaping what they sow here.

Either they make Reading and Barnsley figure something out and the cycle continues, or they dismiss it and make it clear that it's one rule for Derby and another for everyone else.

I'd say they have a slightly better claim than Wycombe. Wycombe's entire claim against us was based on us not being punished in that season for stuff we did in a different season.  At least Barnsley are querying something that's happening in the relevant season.  And if Reading were to overspend again, after adding the likes of Tom Ince to their squad despite being under an enforced business plan, then you can see why they are asking the question.

Don't get me wrong, the whole thing is stupid, but this is the world we live in now thanks to the EFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ramarena said:

image.gif.b994ead1539baff456b0e32d92ea8d95.gif

Yes indeed. Let’s all stop this football stuff & move to the law courts. If you successfully sue you get 3 points, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss. Home and away, solicitors can only play for one legal team, each case can only last 90 minutes, plus “injury claims” time…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said:

The main thing putting Barnsley at a competitive disadvantage is that they are absolutely awful at football. Their claim has no more merit than Wycombe or Boro against us, but the EFL are reaping what they sow here.

Either they make Reading and Barnsley figure something out and the cycle continues, or they dismiss it and make it clear that it's one rule for Derby and another for everyone else.

Surely they can’t punish Derby and then change the rules can they, that just wouldn’t be fair.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ellafella said:

Yes indeed. Let’s all stop this football stuff & move to the law courts. If you successfully sue you get 3 points, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss. Home and away, solicitors can only play for one legal team, each case can only last 90 minutes, plus “injury claims” time…

Derby would get a points deduction for hiring this guysaul goodman GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bald Eagle's Barmy Army said:

What rules???

They can change/clarify the rules to say that EFL disciplinary/FFP matters are off limits for clubs opening disputes against each other.  The league/IDC/LAP's decisions are final.

Edited by duncanjwitham
Can't type
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ellafella said:

Yes indeed. Let’s all stop this football stuff & move to the law courts. If you successfully sue you get 3 points, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss. Home and away, solicitors can only play for one legal team, each case can only last 90 minutes, plus “injury claims” time…

As we said some months ago, the EFL have potentially destroyed the integrity of the division without realising it, by pandering to the parasite clubs.

Wait till all the Covid finances come out. Teams are going to be at each other’s throats when they realise the utter disparity between clubs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atherstoneram said:

Reading are paying their bills and are not in administration.Our situation and theirs are totally different.

It is an assumption that they are paying their bills as it is an assumption that every other football club is paying their bills and the EFL wouldn’t know if they weren’t at this point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tamworthram said:

The article says a further points deduction would be applied next season if Reading fail to comply with the agreed business plan but the Barnsley chairman is saying "Barnsley are at a competitive disadvantage NOW".

Does that mean Barnsley know the details of the agreed plan and also know that Reading are failing to comply?

If they don't know then there is no case to answer at the moment but there could well be a Wycombe scenario (although they'd have a more valid case given the offence actually happened this season) next season now the EFL have allowed the can of worms to be opened. 

If it is true Reading are not complying then I'm not sure why the additional points deduction shouldn't be applied immediately.

Well there are so many leaks from the EFL Barnsley may well be correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Barnsley, it must’ve been blindingly obvious to anybody (other than the EFL) that by not telling Boro and Wycombe to ‘do  one’ they we’re going to open a floodgate of similar claims.
Having said that, Barnsley don’t really have a legitimate claim. Could be quite funny though if it gets dragged out like the Boro issue did.

Edited by angieram
Remove personal insults
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...