Ghost of Clough Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 2 hours ago, kevinhectoring said: Couhig is slimy as a toad and a master of equivocation. But if he says he was paid something, you’re a brave man to say he wasn’t. He’s smart enough not to tell an outright lie Hadn’t seen it before. But having read the DT article you sent round, I think q might have said to him: “yes we’ll pay the legal invoices. We can’t pay you more because we need to pay MSD, football creditors, and we need to pay 25% to unsecureds etc. But if we sell the club and there’s an excess over what we need to avoid a points deduction, we’ll give you some of the bunce (I assume DC paid exactly what was needed to avoid a further points deduction.) If all this is right and if your DT article is to be believed, it looks like this: Couhig is shouting from the sewer that the price of the stadium needs to be taken into account in working out whether there is any bunce. He’s awful My understanding was Coupig getting a percentage of the excess. The sale of the club itself resulting in him getting some cash, but with the stadium included he gets nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 1 hour ago, kevinhectoring said: Well just as I remembered Boro and Wycombe were distinguished tell us what your theory is - rather than simply telling others they have it wrong Are you referring to this little piece in the article "It has been suggested a total payment of about £7m would settle the issues involving Middlesbrough and Wycombe which are partly holding up the sale of the club" A piece from February the 4th that made up the story Then this this piece from 9th March https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/derby-county-wycombe-compensation-administration-6779660 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 9 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: My understanding was Coupig getting a percentage of the excess. The sale of the club itself resulting in him getting some cash, but with the stadium included he gets nothing. Hmmm that seems odd. I’d have thought it was: the sale of the club to DC gets Couhig nothing, because there was no ‘excess’. But if you include the stadium proceeds in the receipts then he would get something. So he’s arguing the stadium receipts should be included. and maybe he’ll also argue that it’s the FMV of the stadium that needs to be used, not 23m Also, I’d think his ‘claim’ is against q/old club But I guess that depends on DC’s deal with Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 11 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said: Hmmm that seems odd. I’d have thought it was: the sale of the club to DC gets Couhig nothing, because there was no ‘excess’. But if you include the stadium proceeds in the receipts then he would get something. So he’s arguing the stadium receipts should be included. and maybe he’ll also argue that it’s the FMV of the stadium that needs to be used, not 23m Also, I’d think his ‘claim’ is against q/old club But I guess that depends on DC’s deal with Q Who is he arguing it to? Who might be expected to pay the scumbag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 14 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: Are you referring to this little piece in the article "It has been suggested a total payment of about £7m would settle the issues involving Middlesbrough and Wycombe which are partly holding up the sale of the club" A piece from February the 4th that made up the story Then this this piece from 9th March https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/derby-county-wycombe-compensation-administration-6779660 Boro was the block to the sale. W was not by the time Boro was settled. And MM distinguished between the two in his ‘offer’ That’s all I was saying. But so what ? Your position seems to be that Couhig hasn’t had a penny from us/q. So you’re saying he’s a liar. Fine if that’s your view but it just seems very unlikely, that’s all, given what he has said. But it’s a bit hard to tell what you actually think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Who is he arguing it to? Who might be expected to pay the scumbag? Good question. The terms of the sale agreement between DC and Q will dictate whether his poxy claim is against old club or new club We don’t know what it says, so far as I know ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norwichram2 Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 Spoke to a nice couple, Wycombe fans, on the train after and they thought Derby deserved to win. They also said they were embarrassed by their chairman's behaviour and accepted that Derby simply got more points than them Interestingly however the guy thought they "had won the court case" and asked if I knew how much they had got! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reggie Greenwood Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 11 hours ago, Norwichram2 said: Spoke to a nice couple, Wycombe fans, on the train after and they thought Derby deserved to win. They also said they were embarrassed by their chairman's behaviour and accepted that Derby simply got more points than them Interestingly however the guy thought they "had won the court case" and asked if I knew how much they had got! As far as I am aware there has never been a “court case “ . David Graham Brown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 3 hours ago, Reggie Greenwood said: As far as I am aware there has never been a “court case “ . Only in the Court of other clubs Football Forum opinions! David Graham Brown and Reggie Greenwood 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 To be even handed a fair few on their forum acknowledged we were the better team.. Sparkle, David Graham Brown, angieram and 4 others 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 19 hours ago, Yani P said: To be even handed a fair few on their forum acknowledged we were the better team.. They should have seen us first half at Charlton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 38 minutes ago, Boycie said: They should have seen us first half at Charlton! Well you didn't.... ? uttoxram75 and Day 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreveram Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 7 minutes ago, Van der MoodHoover said: Well you didn't.... ? uttoxram75, Comrade 86 and Van der MoodHoover 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 4 minutes ago, Foreveram said: I can only say that having put in my annual appearance ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 6 hours ago, Van der MoodHoover said: Well you didn't.... ? I saw it better than those who were there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Boycie said: I saw it better than those who were there! I can tell..... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 The only worrying issue is we seem to sit down and accept our fate against 'big' clubs away. See consistent batterings against Sunderland and Peterborough. I would like one of them to enlighten me as to why they keep referring to Peterborough as a big club. scout's dad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 5 hours ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said: The only worrying issue is we seem to sit down and accept our fate against 'big' clubs away. See consistent batterings against Sunderland and Peterborough. I would like one of them to enlighten me as to why they keep referring to Peterborough as a big club. I think "sleeping giant" was the phrase used..... In Peterboroughs case that's one deep blooming sleep..... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 7 hours ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said: The only worrying issue is we seem to sit down and accept our fate against 'big' clubs away. See consistent batterings against Sunderland and Peterborough. I would like one of them to enlighten me as to why they keep referring to Peterborough as a big club. Compared to Wycombe, most clubs are 'big clubs'? kevinhectoring, Gee SCREAMER !!, TigerTedd and 3 others 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BathRam72 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 28 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: Compared to Wycombe, most clubs are 'big clubs'? Compared to Wycombe, ALL clubs are big clubs, including Chippenham town TigerTedd and Reggie Greenwood 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now