duncanjwitham Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, PistoldPete said: Was Gadsby ever confirmed as a bidder? Not sure if he’s ever been officially named, but I’m not sure anyone has been. We only know for sure about Appleby because he’s made a statement himself. It certainly seems common knowledge that Gadsby has at least been in the running at some stage though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rammieib Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 12 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: But if the Admin are confident they can secure funding to the end of the season then that's what we have to do. Unless Admin have the balls to stand up to the EFL, and as they have now (hurrah!) 'called out the EFL' on this that's a possibility. What does that achieve? We’d still be in the same position then with the two clowns trying to sue us and no takeover can be completed. The Quantama statement said another few weeks - I’d be genuinely interested to know their course of action this month to resolve the open issue. jimtastic56 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: Was Gadsby ever confirmed as a bidder? There was mention on Twitter of another last minute bidder which I ignored (unreliable source), but maybe the admins statement confirms it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 37 minutes ago, angieram said: The statement is out and it all boils down to the EFL insisting on the Middlesbrough and Wycombe claims being sorted before purchase. Three bids on the table but we cannot move on them. The EFL have won. Is it three bids on the table then angie? So not counting Kirchner who's dropped out, it still three? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, Indy said: There was mention on Twitter of another last minute bidder which I ignored (unreliable source), but maybe the admins statement confirms it. Yes I saw that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipperram Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 21 minutes ago, TooFarInToTurnRed said: It means what they are doing does not fit the law So, if I understand this right Derby Mel Morris buying the ground wasn't illegal but didn't fit the law, Derby used an amortisation that wasn't illegal but didn't fit the law too. We get punished for the second one(fined), just how duplicitous do the EFL want to be. Forgive me if I have this wrong. gfs1ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphanram Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Does the 3 bids include the Kirchner bid? Or someone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 4 minutes ago, BucksRam said: What was the response as now deleted I believe. Anything different from the Administrator's statement? Anyone take a screenshot? BucksRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MACKWORTHRAM Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Rams Trust needs to get another statement from the EFL. Because their last statement was a pack of lies. They stated they cannot comment as "They are not party to any such proceedings. These are matters that are required to be addressed and agreed by the parties involved" That's clearly a lie. This is Boro and Wycombe suing us. Legally absolutely no chance of them getting anywhere. Not the EFL. I'm sick of this. How can this be allowed to happen? RadioactiveWaste, Ramarena, jimtastic56 and 7 others 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 (edited) 11 minutes ago, TheresOnlyWanChope said: This needs to go to court. The EFL are either doing something unnecessary or maybe illegal. Here is why- What happens for example if other clubs want to sue Derby who lost to Derby under the three year period of finances looked at - Bristol lost to Derby and they could say they lost momentum and therefore a playoff place was unattainable or something similar. Or Sheffield Wednesday may want to bring a case for example...whatever millions. Its ridiculous. This would be an extension of this farcical situation. The outcome now looks like there could be no club soon unless the claims are dropped or this case is taken to a high court as the EFL may be operating illegally here blocking a takeover. That's the point thought neither Boro or Wycombe are suing Derby. They have put claims in to the administrators but they haven't been dealt with - I think that according to EFL regs they should go to arbitration (?) but I suppose we haven't time and Admin assumed they could pass that 'job' onto the new owner. @MACKWORTHRAM " This is Boro and Wycombe suing us. " But they aren't. Edited January 14, 2022 by RoyMac5 RadioactiveWaste and archram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 16 minutes ago, Boycie said: Someone get Nick D’marco on the case. Isn’t he a Wycombe fan Ralph? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramtastic ones Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 (edited) Just been announced on Midlands today that administrators have stated that the process of selling club is stalled until 'boro and Wycombe cases are solved. Time for the Rams to sue QPR and Villa. Worth noting only one club (Brentford) of last nine promoted have not breached FFP rules in their promotion season. Edited January 14, 2022 by Ramtastic ones Typo Ramarena, SKRam, RoyMac5 and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Rooney after the game tomorrow RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 7 minutes ago, rammieib said: What does that achieve? We’d still be in the same position then with the two clowns trying to sue us and no takeover can be completed. The Quantama statement said another few weeks - I’d be genuinely interested to know their course of action this month to resolve the open issue. Perhaps we'd have time to go to tribunal? Or challenge the EFL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 I'm feeling like I'd rather liquidate the club than gove boro or wycombe a penny. Just out of spite. Amberram, r_wilcockson, strawhillram and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Derby Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 The deal with Gibbo is an imminent 48 days away. Why are we being presumed guilty before the case can be answered? There isn’t one. This is getting so tiresome now, it’s painful. r_wilcockson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirBrian Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: Anyone take a screenshot? Page 62 Bristol city Derby deserve relegation statement from efl in response to rams trust Derbyshire live as an EFL release statement RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted January 14, 2022 Author Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, i-Ram said: Isn’t he a Wycombe fan Ralph? The car parks full, so he’ll be available.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: I'm feeling like I'd rather liquidate the club than gove boro or wycombe a penny. Just out of spite. Problem is Gibson wants that. The other ones a chancer who scribbled something on a fag box and in his own words' had no idea what he was claiming for but put something in' i would really love to know if Gibsons new EFL lackey was party to these discussions. As I understand, Pearce was not privy to any discussions regarding Morris last season under 'request of other board members. Edited January 14, 2022 by Gee SCREAMER !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said: That's the point thought neither Boro or Wycombe are suing Derby. They have put claims in to the administrators but they haven't been dealt with - I think that according to EFL regs they should go to arbitration (?) but I suppose we haven't time and Admin assumed they could pass that 'job' onto the new owner. The administrators do not recognise them as creditors, at least at anything more than a nominal value. So they should not affect the CVA. So the club should be able to deal with the claims after the sale. That's how I interpret it, could be wrong Anyway, EFL seem to disagree. At least given the disagreement there doesn't seem to be any reason why admin team should be forced to sell players.. just not sign any news ones or re-sign existing players. As anything that requires EFL's involvement will mean they will mess things up for us as they always do. Indy, Crewton and Tamworthram 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now