Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said:

I skimmed through the Newcastle Wiki page. They've won nothing of note since the 50s! And that was the FA Cup.

But talking of 'horrible' owners I'd forgotten Shepherd and Hall - they were deeply unpleasant.

Inter-Cities Fair's Cup 1969 vs Ujpest Doza of Hungary was their last major trophy iirc. 

They got above themselves when first Keegan and then Bobby Robson managed them, thought they'd become a permanent fixture in the top 6, not realising that was an abberation. I wouldn't argue that Ashley never really leveraged their potential, but he left them in the PL ffs! Look where Sunderland, if anything a club with a more illustrious history and only a marginally smaller fanbase, are! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should not let the views of Newcastle fans determine our opinion. They have been deluded for many years that they are a big club and should be competing in the Champions league expecting investment to suit.

Even with their new owners they will find it difficult to break in to the elite group and in a year or two the fans will be complaining they are not being ambitious enough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Kathcairns said:

How rediculous, how can anything be worse than liquidation, would love to know their views if the boot was on the other foot.

Myself and a mate watched a boys football match many years ago, A substitute is just about to go on the pitch, My mate notices the Sub has his boots on the wrong feet(left on right, right on left)my mate says "hey lad you've got the boots on the wrong feet" the lad looks down and says..."no they're not they're my feet"

We did laugh ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know why Ashley, after his torrid time with fans at Newcastle, would want to get involved with football again?

Do we know what his relationship with Gibson is like? That part of the world is partisan at so many levels It wouldn't surprise me if Ashley wants in, to spite Gibson!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question mark with Ashley is "does he just want a football club that breaks even" which is fine and is us mostly in the championship with rebuild challenge sell players cycles until we succeed,OR, does Ashley just want a football club in the premier League for advertising sports direct,in which case they'll be an effort to get there and then bumping along not achieving much.

With Moxey/AA they know what they are doing but we're unsure of just how much they'd throw at us to do it.

Either are better than shady Alonso or BZI.

Neither are a utopian vision of DCFC world domination in the name of justice truth and the Derby way.

Anything is better than liquidating the club.

Whatever happens, the next few years are still likely to be rough.

It's all part of the journey.

Edited by RadioactiveWaste
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FindernRam said:

Do we know why Ashley, after his torrid time with fans at Newcastle, would want to get involved with football again?

Do we know what his relationship with Gibson is like? That part of the world is partisan at so many levels It wouldn't surprise me if Ashley wants in, to spite Gibson!

It would be a good, cheap alternative way for him to advertise again.

He is about to open House of Fraser and Flannels in Derby, to add to Sports Direct. Mike Ashley will already have a big presence in our City Centre.

I have no problem with our stadium being called the Flannels Arena or House of Fraser Stadium, either will be better than the Ipro stadium thG Sam Rush gave us.

I said on here 2 years ago I could see Mike Ashley buying us, it just seems a good fit for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about Mike Ashley is he knows how to run a profitable business (i share some of the points of @IslandExile about how he goes about it) and he knows that profitabilty and eventual growth in value of an asset with a view to sell means one thing only and that is PL. Providing you got a good manager you dont need hundreds of millions of investment to get out of the championship, we know that he wouldnt do that, but he has got the means to invest at championship level. Cost cutting isnt an option as there is really no fat to trim at the club, we are already at the bare bones. Putting all the points together. I think I can see that not only it would get us out of a really bad situation but could lead us onto better things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Steve Buckley’s Dog said:

As long as Stephen Pearce remains in charge of our finances then I am firmly in favour of this . 
 

 

If Ashley took over the first thing he should do is appoint Mel Morris as chief executive and ask him to devise a plan to deal and communicate with the EFL and Middlesbrough and Wycombe football clubs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EtoileSportiveDeDerby said:

The thing about Mike Ashley is he knows how to run a profitable business (i share some of the points of @IslandExile about how he goes about it) and he knows that profitabilty and eventual growth in value of an asset with a view to sell means one thing only and that is PL. Providing you got a good manager you dont need hundreds of millions of investment to get out of the championship, we know that he wouldnt do that, but he has got the means to invest at championship level. Cost cutting isnt an option as there is really no fat to trim at the club, we are already at the bare bones. Putting all the points together. I think I can see that not only it would get us out of a really bad situation but could lead us onto better things.

If you’re looking at cost cutting, the first place to go will likely be the academy. Don’t think Newcastle funded theirs particularly well, but I could be wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FindernRam said:

Do we know why Ashley, after his torrid time with fans at Newcastle, would want to get involved with football again?

Do we know what his relationship with Gibson is like? That part of the world is partisan at so many levels It wouldn't surprise me if Ashley wants in, to spite Gibson!

Steve Gibson seems (or at least seemed) to quite like him, according to this: https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/13325725.boro-chairman-steve-gibson-thinks-steve-mcclaren-ideal-magpies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Van der MoodHoover said:

If you read articles from around the time he took over Newcastle, they were - on a larger scale - in a very similar position to us. 

The way Mike Ashley chose to stabilise them was by significant cost cutting. 

Some folks seem to think that he will stabilise Derby by astute investment. 

He has no track record of doing so.

The difference being that we have had the significant cost cutting already - can he pay the bills - yes - then we can progress with what we have currently 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Maharan said:

If you’re looking at cost cutting, the first place to go will likely be the academy. Don’t think Newcastle funded theirs particularly well, but I could be wrong 

I am not so sure. We are a different prospect being Championship/L1. The academy is the one place that potentially generates surplus income. .. hey, as you imply none of us knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Maharan said:

If you’re looking at cost cutting, the first place to go will likely be the academy. Don’t think Newcastle funded theirs particularly well, but I could be wrong 

Good point but as we stand with the amount of players coming through into the first team a shrewd business man will see the value. It is one thing producing academy players for a championship team and another for PL team, even a very average one like Newcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EtoileSportiveDeDerby said:

Good point but as we stand with the amount of players coming through into the first team a shrewd business man will see the value. It is one thing producing academy players for a championship team and another for PL team, even a very average one like Newcastle.

Absolutely, it’s like comparing apples with a traffic cone. It is the only remaining significant cost that can be cut though, so it’ll be interesting to see what happens. 
 

is losing the academy ideal? Far from it, but if it’s the price that needs to be paid for saving the club, then reluctantly I’m all for it. (Or at least reduce funding to below category 1. You don’t absolutely need cat 1 to produce promising players) 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TooFarInToTurnRed said:

We should not let the views of Newcastle fans determine our opinion. They have been deluded for many years that they are a big club and should be competing in the Champions league expecting investment to suit.

Even with their new owners they will find it difficult to break in to the elite group and in a year or two the fans will be complaining they are not being ambitious enough.

This.

Plus whilst Ashley's business morals might not be the best, I'd like @IslandExile and @Dimmu et al to tell me which extremely rich capitalist they favour? As has been pointed out GSE appointed Porn Jewell! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Maharan said:

If you’re looking at cost cutting, the first place to go will likely be the academy. Don’t think Newcastle funded theirs particularly well, but I could be wrong 

You’re right, this is a worry. But, our academy is successful. Newcastle’s is terrible and was before Ashley arrived. For a club Newcastle’s size, they never produce. Ashley isn’t stupid, our academy could make him more money. I’m sure on that basis, he’d be happy to fund it still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...