Sparkle Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 19 minutes ago, LauraH said: What did they offer to pay us ? Andrew3000 and RadioactiveWaste 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 1 minute ago, IslandExile said: How can Boro self-appoint themselves as "football creditors" when - as they say their "claim" has not yet been ruled upon. They need @David to explain what a creditor means. Their point I quoted above. IF they'd been allowed to go through with their claim, then IF they'd won (which of course is certain! :D) Then they would be football creditors. But they didn't and they aren't! RadioactiveWaste and IslandExile 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 21 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: Pick the bones from the 21 we have left https://www.dcfc.co.uk/teams/1st-team Good grief how are we doing so well ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 I may be in the minority now, I usually am, but I think we now just let Quantuma get on with their job. The work done by so many over recent days has had great success mobilising large groups of fans (Rams and others), and tremendous success in getting publicity for our grievances, both on TV/Radio, in the press, and astonishingly as a question in the UK parliament today. It has also flushed out the responses of the EFL and Boro. BUT now it does come down to the suits to sort it out. We should not be distracting them from what will be a vital few weeks negotiating with the EFL, Boro, and our preferred buyer, knowing the whole football world, and the Government are watching very closely. Well done everyone, and come on Quantuma. You Rams! kevinhectoring, The Scarlet Pimpernel, Indy and 6 others 3 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Suspect the Administrators haven't been back in touch with the muppets since November was because their initial response to the claim was to tell them it wasn't a valid claim - why would they need that repeating to them? So much absolute bull in that statement.... rammieib, SaffyRam, RadioactiveWaste and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Once again claiming that there's more to the claims than just the amortisation ruling. Not inclined to believe that. Confidential is everyone's favourite word at the moment. It means you don't have to back up any claims, they can just say we owe them money because reasons. RadioactiveWaste, r_wilcockson and Indy 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Adslegend, Indyram, r_wilcockson and 12 others 7 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 25 minutes ago, DantheRam90 said: https://t.co/K1VLy0Hy7k Middlesbrough have released a Statement now.... They obviously don’t like the publicity And I believe there to be liable in that statement and I wish we had an owner who would take them to task there is information in there which clearly they wouldn’t have been in possession of unless they obtained it from the EFL either legally or illegally Indy, Wsm-ram, r_wilcockson and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 4 minutes ago, i-Ram said: I may be in the minority now, I usually am, but I think we now just let Quantuma get on with their job. The work done by so many over recent days has had great success mobilising large groups of fans (Rams and others), and tremendous success in getting publicity for our grievances, both on TV/Radio, in the press, and astonishingly as a question in the UK parliament today. It has also flushed out the responses of the EFL and Boro. BUT now it does come down to the suits to sort it out. We should not be distracting them from what will be a vital few weeks negotiating with the EFL, Boro, and our preferred buyer, knowing the whole football world, and the Government are watching very closely. Well done everyone, and come on Quantuma. You Rams! Or....... Is it time for the Administrators/club to now come out with a public statement addressing (shooting down) the points in the EFL and Boro statements? Let's keep the momentum and public support while we have it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramrob Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 26 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: Pick the bones from the 21 we have left https://www.dcfc.co.uk/teams/1st-team What about the 4 goals? Poor Curtis, having the season of his life and his goals don't even get a mention ? Rammy03 and Caerphilly Ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said: Fine them. £45m. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Just now, IslandExile said: Or....... Is it time for the Administrators/club to now come out with a public statement addressing (shooting down) the points in the EFL and Boro statements? Let's keep the momentum and public support while we have it ? Can’t see how they don’t come out and address those two statements now. r_wilcockson and RadioactiveWaste 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 17 minutes ago, HuddersRam said: As bad as that statement is (not losing six in a row helps you get promoted, lads), why would Quantuma not make contact with one of the key blockers to a sale for two months? If you believe Boro. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 Is this right about our accounts relating to Boro's claim? RadioactiveWaste, Andicis and Indy 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 5 minutes ago, Sparkle said: They obviously don’t like the publicity And I believe there to be liable in that statement and I wish we had an owner who would take them to task there is information in there which clearly they wouldn’t have been in possession of unless they obtained it from the EFL either legally or illegally I thought that. The libel would be against individuals (previous owners and directors) not the club, I think - so not really affected by us not having an owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 4 hours ago, Coconut's Beard said: I think we're pretty screwed next season too tbh The sign are that the EFl stuff will get sorted. If we make no further player sales, Curtis (and Wayne, I think he’ll stay around) may yet deliver us a miracle this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 6 minutes ago, StaffsRam said: Can’t see how they don’t come out and address those two statements now. I think it should take time to address those two statements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highgate Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 We almost certainly saved Middlesbrough the anguish of play-off failure that season, and allowed them plenty of time to prepare for the following season without distractions. We probably ended up doing them a favour...indirectly. For our point deductions I have always felt that we were culpable, or that Mel was culpable I should say, however badly it was all handled by the EFL. However how the EFL are dealing with these claims by Middlesbrough and Wycombe is nothing short of outrageous. It's like they are deliberately trying to obliterate one of their founding members. Would love to know what actually goes on at one of their board meetings, how are they justifying their behaviour to themselves? Adslegend and RadioactiveWaste 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eatonram Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) 40 minutes ago, DantheRam90 said: https://t.co/K1VLy0Hy7k Middlesbrough have released a Statement now.... The use of the word “cheat” crops up every other sentence. What were all these other example of “cheating” that we have never been charged with? Again if they think there are other issues that require a charge ask the EFL? Edited January 18, 2022 by Eatonram RoyMac5 and RadioactiveWaste 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 13 minutes ago, Tombo said: Once again claiming that there's more to the claims than just the amortisation ruling. Not inclined to believe that. Confidential is everyone's favourite word at the moment. It means you don't have to back up any claims, they can just say we owe them money because reasons. Middlesbrough turned me into a newt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now