24Charlie Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, Taribo said: Any footage? I can’t find the replay anywhere If you recorded EFL on Quest it's on there. I think you can do a catch up on the dplay app. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 What happened to the guy who elbowed Jaglielka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Dethorn said: Now that is an interesting proposition The ref saw that, therefore no retrospective action possible, (but didn't think a deliberate hand-ball in the area worthy of a foul). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 14 minutes ago, atherstoneram said: I would say the camera footage is fairly conclusive. 6 minutes ago, mike93rh said: How blinkered are our fans that people are even questioning it. He's stamped on the man's c**k, it's a blatant red! ? Incidentally it's also the best thing he's ever done in a Derby shirt. I take it you've never stumbled before. Instinct means you put your un-planted foot to the ground as quickly as possible. The clue as to whether it's a stamp or not is with the foot coming back up, not going down. With an accidental step the instinct also kicks in and the foot is pulled up a lot quicker than a stamp, where the foot becomes planted. duncanjwitham and brady1993 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinder Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 To be honest, I thought it looked bad at the time and was surprised - I didn’t think Fozzy had it in him. It’s a killer for us though with the size of our squad. Thank goodness Buchanan is back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 28 minutes ago, simmoram1995 said: Forsyth has been given a retrospective ban following his “stamp” Good. Though I lost my bet that it'd be Sibley sent off in that game. i-Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 It's just a pity the dog wasn't castrated. Derby4Me 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 He could appeal on the basis that he didn't know the Forest player had such a well-packed lunchbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: Accidentally lands with his right foot on the guys leg which off-balances him, and he instinctively puts out his left leg to balance himself. At no stage does he look where the guy is, or aim for him or anything. It's pure natural reaction. Joke of a decision. If that incident had been the other way around I would be screaming for action. It looks really bad and a suspect a neutral would concur with the ban, I can't speak for the rest of the world! Edited September 2, 2021 by Spanish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Looked accidental to me. I can't see how anyone can make their minds up from the replays. Only Forsyth will know if he intended it. Carl Sagan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Ram Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 This thread is a study in cognitive bias! I mean it's a man's game isn't it? Deliberately stamping on another human beings testicles is all part of football isn't it? If you're not prepared to have your baalocks stamped on, go play frisbee instead??♂️ Yet another sign of the vendetta against us obviously... I'm a big fan of Forsyth. He was a brilliant signing by Nigel Clough, has been a great servant and has been in great form this season. The ball to Lawrence was as good as it gets. But what he did was as inexcusable as it was out of character and this ban was both inevitable and fully deserved. i-Ram, atherstoneram and Wolfie 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Fozzy is not that sort of player. End of. I watched it several times. He didn't once look down. It was to stop him stumbling. He pulled up very quickly. It's the wrong decision and a poor one - yet another cross to bear for us. Dethorn, Amberram and Taribo 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenavo Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, CornwallRam said: Looked accidental to me. I can't see how anyone can make their minds up from the replays. Only Forsyth will know if he intended it. If it was intended fair play to him, he absolutely nailed it! Edited September 2, 2021 by Kenavo CornwallRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, BucksRam said: Fozzy is not that sort of player. End of. I watched it several times. He didn't once look down. It was to stop him stumbling. He pulled up very quickly. It's the wrong decision and a poor one - yet another cross to bear for us. he didn't need to look for the player, he was on the ground, peripheral vision would have been enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Kenavo said: If it was intended fair play to him, he absoutely nailed it! The dog would still be on crutches if he'd nailed it proper (and singing soprano). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Did the Boro player who elbowed Jagielka get a retrospective ban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Just now, TexasRam said: Did the Boro player who elbowed Jagielka get a retrospective ban? who is responsible for notifying the retrospective review? If it is DCFC then you can give up on that because that would require organization. Ramarena 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VulcanRam Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 I think the thing most people are missing is that it doesn't have to be a deliberate act to constitute violent conduct. Just doing it, deliberate or accidental, is enough. RadioactiveWaste, atherstoneram and Bianoic 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 9 minutes ago, Spanish said: he didn't need to look for the player, he was on the ground, peripheral vision would have been enough Yeah agree - but to do him for it surely there has to be clear evidence it was deliberate. I don't see it personally. If he meant it, and wanted it to be effective, he really ought to have put a little twist on it at the end. Poor execution IMO then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Just now, BucksRam said: Yeah agree - but to do him for it surely there has to be clear evidence it was deliberate. I don't see it personally. If he meant it, and wanted it to be effective, he really ought to have put a little twist on it at the end. Poor execution IMO then. I think stamping on the general area was accurate enough now you expect him to twist on the end? Expectations of some fans are impossible to meet? Ghost of Clough, Kinder and BucksRam 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now