Forsyth

[simmoram1995]

Forsyth has been given a retrospective ban following his “stamp”

[Ghost of Clough]

Surely will be appealed

[brady1993]

I still stand by that I think it was clumsy and accidental rather than deliberate and malicious. He's regaining his balance after landing.

[atherstoneram]

1 minute ago, Ghost of Clough said:

Surely will be appealed

I would say the camera footage is fairly conclusive.

[Donnyram]

That's down to Sky pundits nailing him

Edited September 2, 2021 by Donnyram

[EnigmaRam]

Well of course he has

[Stive Pesley]

any footage? I missed it

[Derbados]

Do we get our stonewall penalties back then?

farce

[StarterForTen]

6 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said:

Surely will be appealed

He's already accepted the automatic punishment of three game ban

[cosmic]

Genuinely can't decide if this was a red or not (I'm swaying towards it was deliberate and a fair punishment). However, all my energy will now be focused on the conspiracy that this is 100% unjust and the EFL have simply found another opportunity to punish us. COYR.

[roboto]

3 minutes ago, Derbados said:

Do we get our stonewall penalties back then?

farce

Should be at least a retrospective red card for moving the arm towards the ball and stopping a goal scoring opportunity.

[mike93rh]

How blinkered are our fans that people are even questioning it. He's stamped on the man's c**k, it's a blatant red! ?

Incidentally it's also the best thing he's ever done in a Derby shirt. 

[May Contain Nuts]

Punishment via 20 slow-motion replays, applying superhuman levels of reaction, speed of thought & imagined intent to a situation where the player's focus would be entirely on trying to win the header, leaving them less than half a second to switch their thinking to deliberately trying to injure an opponent and maneuver themselves into the position to do so.

Anything like this should be looked at entirely in real time, a maximum of 5 times from at most 2 camera angles, same with all the VAR poo where it's supposed to be about clear and obvious errors.

It was right infront of me at the ground, an incident of no particular note.

The only players who reacted to it were their bloke and Forsyth, everyone else carried on - it was a local Derby FFS! A game where any sort of contentious incident will be appealed and remonstrated at length given the merest hint of being able to get the opposition player sent off.  Completely ridiculous.

 

Edited September 2, 2021 by Coconut's Beard

[Taribo]

Any footage? I can’t find the replay anywhere 

[Dethorn]

12 minutes ago, brady1993 said:

I still stand by that I think it was clumsy and accidental rather than deliberate and malicious. He's regaining his balance after landing.

I agree

I think he led with the arm a bit for the header - maybe a booking

[JMC]

No surprise he got this, for me a clear stamp.. 

That's two updates today from the EFL, it's like they are working through the Derby bad behaviour list today... Wonder what's next?? 

[Dethorn]

12 minutes ago, Donnyram said:

That's down to Sky pundits nailing him

On that logic that is OK then because we will get a retrospective penalty or two and win the game ?

[Ram1988]

Fantastic. The EFL have found another way to make our already thin sqaud even thinner for three games.

[Dethorn]

7 minutes ago, roboto said:

Should be at least a retrospective red card for moving the arm towards the ball and stopping a goal scoring opportunity.

Now that is an interesting proposition

[brady1993]

Just now, Dethorn said:

I agree

I think he led with the arm a bit for the header - maybe a booking

That I could see and to be honest I thought he was lucky to dodge a booking for a tackle a little after.

But the whole "stamp" thing, I just don't see it and I wouldn't be calling for it if it was the other way around.