BathRam72 Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 8 hours ago, Tamworthram said: Doesn’t your final sentence pretty much negate the rest of your post? It was indeed a botched together youth team playing against an experienced, albeit non league, team. Er no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickD Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 5 hours ago, Papahet said: Is that even proven? It’s one header fookin hell man, no different than banging your head on a shelf Bang yours a few times...please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickD Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 7 hours ago, RoyMac5 said: Indeed. The game was in the balance until the last 10 minutes. What might have been if we'd been given that penalty? 2-1? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancashire lad Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 I do not ever think I will see Chorley 1st game on Match of the Day..I thought 2020 was bit mad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Lancashire lad said: I do not ever think I will see Chorley 1st game on Match of the Day..I thought 2020 was bit mad... Yes old jug ears crisp muncher still despises us. If the Beeb thinks that a non league outfit turning over a managerless side playing it's Under 23s is sensationalist then it's fallen further than I thought to whip up a headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancashire lad Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 9 minutes ago, Tyler Durden said: Yes old jug ears crisp muncher still despises us. If the Beeb thinks that a non league outfit turning over a managerless side playing it's Under 23s is sensationalist then it's fallen further than I thought to whip up a headline. I think it's more to do with a team with 350£ aweek best paid player being in the hat for last 32 and 16 of the FA cup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 Just now, Lancashire lad said: I think it's more to do with a team with 350£ aweek best paid player being in the hat for last 32 and 16 of the FA cup Yes fair play to you, you can only beat what's put out Infront of you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 41 minutes ago, Lancashire lad said: I think it's more to do with a team with 350£ aweek best paid player being in the hat for last 32 and 16 of the FA cup It's not mate. As a Leicester fan, he likes to whip up this imaginary rivalry when neither us or Forest give a hoot like they all do. I didn't see match of the day, but knew the tit would get a mention on here at some point after todays result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 47 minutes ago, Lancashire lad said: I think it's more to do with a team with 350£ aweek best paid player being in the hat for last 32 and 16 of the FA cup I said we should have bought him at h/t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 A bloody disgrace to lose to a team like Chorley. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Tram Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 On 07/01/2021 at 07:17, Tamworthram said: You’re really not getting it are you? Would cancelling the FA Cup allow A-levels to take place? No, of course not so they are is no link whatsoever. Would cancelling football allow schools to reopen? Of corse not. Finally, if the FA Cup is to be completed this season then of course it needs to be completed by a certain date. Please don’t tell me what I can cut out simply because we disagree. I was saying that you could "cut out" (i.e. ignore) what I had written about exams you nitwit! ? I wasn't telling you to "cut it out" (as in, telling you to "stop disagreeing")! The exact opposite! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimRam Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 Any more news on the woman eating during the match? Was it yogurt or mousse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Tram Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 I am still upset about the decision to play the game. Maybe I shouldn't get so pent up!) Does anyone know if we had to play the game? I seem to remember some mention of "negotiation". (I heard José M yesterday saying something about the integrity of football standards. He said what I had been saying about the FA Cup, but far more effectively than me!) I wonder if we compromised too readily? My latest conspiracy theory is that the manager and first team may have been relatively willing for the match to go ahead without them considering that they hadn't been paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 28 minutes ago, Ken Tram said: I am still upset about the decision to play the game. Maybe I shouldn't get so pent up!) Does anyone know if we had to play the game? I seem to remember some mention of "negotiation". (I heard José M yesterday saying something about the integrity of football standards. He said what I had been saying about the FA Cup, but far more effectively than me!) I wonder if we compromised too readily? My latest conspiracy theory is that the manager and first team may have been relatively willing for the match to go ahead without them considering that they hadn't been paid. Villa were "forced" to play their game against Liverpool the day before with virtually the same issues we had if that makes you feel better? Not sure why you're so upset, if the game had been postponed then it would just have added another fixture that we could do without in a compressed timeframe? Another game that we need like a hole in the head when survival is our first, second and third priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaaLocks Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 Have we ever lost to non-league opposition before? I can't think of a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RYRAM Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, BaaLocks said: Have we ever lost to non-league opposition before? I can't think of a time. with a second string team of youngsters no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 2 minutes ago, RYRAM said: with a second string team of youngsters no! Third string wasn't it given a lot of our more senior under 23's were also unable to play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 11 minutes ago, BaaLocks said: Have we ever lost to non-league opposition before? I can't think of a time. Oh cmon I think we hold every unwanted record in World football. 1955 Boston at home lost 6-1, which I think still maybe a league team’s worst performance v non league in cup history Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wistaston Ram Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 14 minutes ago, BaaLocks said: Have we ever lost to non-league opposition before? I can't think of a time. Crawley Town during the Nigel Clough years, Boston United going back a bit further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 7 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: Third string wasn't it given a lot of our more senior under 23's were also unable to play? 4th string at most in all seriousness. 1. First XI 2. Subs/reserves 3. 1st choice U23s 5th choice GK (not even including the 3 we have out on loan). 7th choice CF, and our first 8 wingers all unavailable. Our 3rd choice LB tested positive the day before the game forcing us to use a winger at LB. I could go on... We had so few players available that we weren't even able to name a full subs bench.despite having over 40 players officially make up the U23 and U18 sqauds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.