Jump to content

Updated Rams manager's win percentages


admira

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, admira said:

Post BC. Warne in 4th, better than Dave Mackay who won the league title, Rowett, Lampard, Cox, Smith, Davies, Clement.

Don't shoot me down but maybe he's getting unnecessary stick?

image.png.07e9c1add5b3e61e3f8aaf22e1fe08e9.png

 

Paul Warne gaining his wins in the 3rd division where as others around him played 1st or 2nd division teams. If he was managing the team in the league above I would understand it. But when you're not beat Stevenage and Cheltenham then it does throw these kind of stats into question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, admira said:

Post BC. Warne in 4th, better than Dave Mackay who won the league title, Rowett, Lampard, Cox, Smith, Davies, Clement.

Don't shoot me down but maybe he's getting unnecessary stick?

Lights blue touch paper and runs....😉

image.png.07e9c1add5b3e61e3f8aaf22e1fe08e9.png

 

What's the trend as time has gone on? Specifically, Feb onwards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SSD said:

Paul Warne gaining his wins in the 3rd division where as others around him played 1st or 2nd division teams. If he was managing the team in the league above I would understand it. But when you're not beat Stevenage and Cheltenham then it does throw these kind of stats into question.

Let's flip the coin...

All other managers around him had much better players ready for the level they were playing at.

Along with the circumstances involved in the past 2 or so years that other managers also did not have then lets just see it as a positive.

As I said the other day, we can always look for a negative if you try hard enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, therams69 said:

Let's flip the coin...

All other managers around him had much better players ready for the level they were playing at.

Along with the circumstances involved in the past 2 or so years that other managers also did not have then lets just see it as a positive.

As I said the other day, we can always look for a negative if you try hard enough.

Did they? Which ones had top 3-5 budgets in their league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, therams69 said:

Let's flip the coin...

All other managers around him had much better players ready for the level they were playing at.

Along with the circumstances involved in the past 2 or so years that other managers also did not have then lets just see it as a positive.

As I said the other day, we can always look for a negative if you try hard enough.

The league table? The s*** football? 

 

Edited by RoyMac5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SSD said:

Paul Warne gaining his wins in the 3rd division where as others around him played 1st or 2nd division teams. If he was managing the team in the league above I would understand it. But when you're not beat Stevenage and Cheltenham then it does throw these kind of stats into question.

What weighting factor would you apply to these stats to then factor in your point?

Whatever way you cut it that's the amount of games each manager has won during their tenures.

If you don't accept the findings then thats not a problem with the results themselves but yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, admira said:

Post BC. Warne in 4th, better than Dave Mackay who won the league title, Rowett, Lampard, Cox, Smith, Davies, Clement.

Don't shoot me down but maybe he's getting unnecessary stick?

Lights blue touch paper and runs....😉

image.png.07e9c1add5b3e61e3f8aaf22e1fe08e9.png

 

How many are there in comparison in the third division? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dean (hick) Saunders said:

So… It should be 65%+ in order for PW to be considered successful and anything less is failure?

You've plucked that number from thin air, but if you're asking me whether he should be comfortably at the top of this table, then yes. Comparing him with managers that have managed in harder divisions is unhelpful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never get why they use win % as a measurement surely it should be points per game. 

You could play 20 games win 9 draw 11 so get 38 points but win % 45% or play 20 win 10 lose 10 get 30 points but have 50% win ratio 

Still don’t think you can compare 3rd division results with first division results 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, admira said:

Post BC. Warne in 4th, better than Dave Mackay who won the league title, Rowett, Lampard, Cox, Smith, Davies, Clement.

Don't shoot me down but maybe he's getting unnecessary stick?

Lights blue touch paper and runs....😉

image.png.07e9c1add5b3e61e3f8aaf22e1fe08e9.png

 

A few errors I spotted:

Liam Rosenior - 58.3%

Billy Davies - 44.9% (it was a 34.8% loss record)

Roy McFarland - managed for 2 spells. The 1st for just 9 games with a 44.4% win record, then a 2nd spell of 93 games with a 43.0% win record.

Terry Westley - 25%

Paul Jewell - 22.4%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tyler Durden said:

What weighting factor would you apply to these stats to then factor in your point?

Whatever way you cut it that's the amount of games each manager has won during their tenures.

If you don't accept the findings then thats not a problem with the results themselves but yourself. 

so you don't think that playing all his games against opposition he is almost always expected to beat will muddy the outcome somewhat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...