MackworthRamIsGod Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 4 minutes ago, Ramarena said: I don’t see how this story ties in with what we know/think we know. Like I said yesterday, the admins are telling Rooney what he wants to hear, if Percy is right the meeting today hasn't gone quite the way the Admins were expecting and Rooney was led to believe it would. Clearly there won't be an announcement tonight now given the time yet Rooney told us we would know by tomorrow, which to me means midnight tonight. Something has changed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 We are being asked by the EFL if we have money before the club gets a takeover which provides us with money. Utterly farcical. Carl Sagan and r_wilcockson 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 Proof of funds happens when the preferred bidder is named, as they then have to cough up £5m. Its the same process looked at from two different points of view. RoyMac5, LeedsCityRam and Eddie 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 7 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: It's nothing new or surprising. The club is in insolvency and wants to sign players and extensions - being asked "and can you pay for that?" Before the EFL agree to the contract is in line with their process for insovant clubs - and DCFC and the administrators know that. Can they provide proof or not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 5 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Like I said yesterday, the admins are telling Rooney what he wants to hear, if Percy is right the meeting today hasn't gone quite the way the Admins were expecting and Rooney was led to believe it would. Clearly there won't be an announcement tonight now given the time yet Rooney told us we would know by tomorrow, which to me means midnight tonight. Something has changed Percy's story doesn't even mention whether a preferred bidder will be announced, you're conflating two different stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 Just now, Carnero said: Percy's story doesn't even mention whether a preferred bidder will be announced, you're conflating two different stories. To be honest I'm going out my fricking mind and don't know what to believe anymore. RoyMac5, Miggins and Gritstone Tup 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 4 hours ago, Ambitious said: What and who are we predicting? I have a sneaky feeling it will be Mike Ashley. In what appears to be a two horse race, I'm sarcastically calling the above post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirBrian Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 minute ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: To be honest I'm going out my fricking mind and don't know what to believe anymore. More like torture by a 1000 cuts Gritstone Tup and MackworthRamIsGod 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Tup Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 37 minutes ago, Chester40 said: The fact these exclusive insider updates seem to have no idea who is the preferred bidder is really confusing me.... You’re not alone! Smoke and mirrors constantly I’m beyond fed up tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 10 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Like I said yesterday, the admins are telling Rooney what he wants to hear, if Percy is right the meeting today hasn't gone quite the way the Admins were expecting and Rooney was led to believe it would. Clearly there won't be an announcement tonight now given the time yet Rooney told us we would know by tomorrow, which to me means midnight tonight. Something has changed So a professional Administration team who have the full knowledge of football administration, Forgot to bring their bank statement or proof of funds from a 3rd party to satisfy the loons at the EFL...how embarrassing of them to forget such important documents SirBrian, The Scarlet Pimpernel, i-Ram and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Gaspode said: ... and I suspect that (knowing how the EFL work)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 6 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: To be honest I'm going out my fricking mind and don't know what to believe anymore. It's just a re-hash of the same story Nixon posted back in October. If we want to sign players we have to show we can fund them. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/16446073/efl-Derby-administrators-prove-complete-season/ Courtesy of @Steve Bloomer's Washing LeedsCityRam, RoyMac5, r_wilcockson and 5 others 4 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 minute ago, Carnero said: It's just a re-hash of the same story Nixon posted back in October. If we want to sign players we have to show we can fund them. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/16446073/efl-Derby-administrators-prove-complete-season/ Courtesy of @Steve Bloomer's Washing You'd think Percy supported our rivals wouldn't you...oh wait a minute. hintonsboots, Gritstone Tup, LeedsCityRam and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Derby Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 Proof of funds required. I’m compiling a letter to Gibbo to ask how he wants it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Tup Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 minute ago, Carnero said: It's just a re-hash of the same story Nixon posted back in October. If we want to sign players we have to show we can fund them. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/16446073/efl-Derby-administrators-prove-complete-season/ Courtesy of @Steve Bloomer's Washing It’s either a rehash of that story or a rehash of the same situation as October, because absolutely nothing has changed! Take your pick. r_wilcockson and FlyBritishMidland 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 I reckon Gibson and Parry are actually the same person. Has anyone ever seen them in the same room? ?♂️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EraniosSocks Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 2 steps forward ( we think ) 6 back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyBritishMidland Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Heisenberg said: Some serious contradictions going on somewhere.. I suspect this may have on item on the agenda anyway. And I think the administrators were asked to provide proof funds we could complete the season when they were appointed in the event a sale didn’t go through before the end of the season. He says Ashley is considering a bid, so in his view means it’s not yet in. You could then draw the conclusion that it’s the Appleby, Rush & Moxey triumvirate who are the PB. As Moxey is on the EFL Committee, all have experience of running a football club do we really think this would be an issue? He also states that the ‘Boro and Wycombe issues are a stumbling block, which the administrators have confirmed it isn’t. A regurgitation of old stuff issued at a time to make it looks like it’s new and “exclusive”. And if it really did come out of the meeting things like that are usually preceded with the phrase “a source close to the EFL said……”. Rant over ?!! Edited January 13, 2022 by FlyBritishMidland Dean (hick) Saunders, r_wilcockson and LeedsCityRam 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 The article seems to be suggesting that the proof of funds is needed before we can move forward on anything, but surely if the EFL approves a buyer we will have the funds? It seems to be implying that we need to provide proof of funds without a buyer in place? Why would the EFL do that? Carl Sagan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 4 minutes ago, angieram said: The article seems to be suggesting that the proof of funds is needed before we can move forward on anything, but surely if the EFL approves a buyer we will have the funds? It seems to be implying that we need to provide proof of funds without a buyer in place? Why would the EFL do that? imply/implying indicate the truth or existence of (something) by suggestion rather than explicit reference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now