JfR Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Independent commission rules that the Premier League does not have the authority to charge them with an alleged breach of PSR between 2019 and 2023, as the accounting period ended on 30th June 2023, which "came after the point the club had ceased to be a member of the League" https://www.premierleague.com/news/4106719 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted September 3 Author Share Posted September 3 Ah, bugger, meant to post this in the Football Forum Steve How Hard? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimeram Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 10 minutes ago, JfR said: Independent commission rules that the Premier League does not have the authority to charge them with an alleged breach of PSR between 2019 and 2023, as the accounting period ended on 30th June 2023, which "came after the point the club had ceased to be a member of the League" https://www.premierleague.com/news/4106719 8 minutes ago, JfR said: Ah, bugger, meant to post this in the Football Forum It'll get shifted soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 11 minutes ago, JfR said: Independent commission rules that the Premier League does not have the authority to charge them with an alleged breach of PSR between 2019 and 2023, as the accounting period ended on 30th June 2023, which "came after the point the club had ceased to be a member of the League" https://www.premierleague.com/news/4106719 utter b******* decision. Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramslad1992 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Looks like they’ll have to get relegated the good old fashioned way then… by being s****. Stive Pesley and Premier ram 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Golden Wonder > Walkers. Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 I can't even get myself worked up to get remotely annoyed about this anymore. DarkFruitsRam7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaltRam Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 34 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Golden Wonder > Walkers. Ooohhh...you're on thin ice there, sir. Walkers are second only to Seabrooks, and be damned to anyone who says different!!! RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 And to think we got done retrospectively for 'wrongful amortisation'. Our liquidators/lawyers were deffo from Temu. Stive Pesley and Crewton 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier ram Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleover ram Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Crewton, Red_Dawn and InstaRam 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 A 20 year history of cheating and they've never once been punished adequately. F*****g disgraceful. Red_Dawn, Reggie Greenwood, Patrick Rams and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baj Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Nothing surprises me nowadays, possible silver lining though - bad news for the Red Dogs, massive points deduction even at this early stage may have been difficult to claw back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtoileSportiveDeDerby Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 It tells you enough about football nowadays when a good team of lawyers is just as important as a good or keeperstriker. Still on FFP, Chelsea have just made 6M on a young winger in a year who has never played for the club. he spent last year on loan at Strasbourg and was bang average by all accounts and they just sold him to a $audi club. It turns out that a few players surplus to requirements head that way, Kante, Mendy , Koulibali also well ended up there for reasonable transfer fees. Purely by coincidence Clearlake capital who own Chelsea, also manage a lot of $audi capital. Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richinspain Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 Isn't it incredible what difference having billionaire owners who are prepared to fight their case (even if it is only a technical one) can make? If they weren't prepared to lose more money or had just lost interest what would have happened? Crewton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexxxxx Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 Just shows how badly the rules are dreamt up. Remove PSR and put a proper salary cap in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 When QPR, Leicester, Bournemouth and Watford got promoted whilst breaching the EFL's FFP regulations, the EFL asked the EPL to confirm that they would help them carry out whatever punishment the EFL Tribunal decided should be awarded against those clubs, the EPL said it was nothing to do with them as they hadn't breached any EPL regulations. This left the EFL having to negotiate reduced penalties with all but QPR, even then after years of legal threats and wranglings. All because the EPL refused to have an integrated FFP system with the EFL. So this problem is entirely of the EPL's own making. I hope it costs them tens of millions in legal fees over the next few years, the blood-sucking, pyramid-destroying w**kpots. Comrade 86, Grumpy Git, Gaspode and 5 others 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 6 minutes ago, Crewton said: When QPR, Leicester, Bournemouth and Watford got promoted whilst breaching the EFL's FFP regulations, the EFL asked the EPL to confirm that they would help them carry out whatever punishment the EFL Tribunal decided should be awarded against those clubs, the EPL said it was nothing to do with them as they hadn't breached any EPL regulations. This left the EFL having to negotiate reduced penalties with all but QPR, even then after years of legal threats and wranglings. All because the EPL refused to have an integrated FFP system with the EFL. So this problem is entirely of the EPL's own making. I hope it costs them tens of millions in legal fees over the next few years, the blood-sucking, pyramid-destroying w**kpots. I should also have said that, once again, a football body may have to change it's rules to plug a breach by Leicester City FC that the club itself was not punished for (the first one being the introduction of automatic points deductions for clubs going into administration in 2004). Reggie Greenwood and JJs dms 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Hound Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 Leicester may have dodged this one but Masters and the PL have them in their sights now so don't be surprised if they start getting the wrong end of some contentious decisions now.... You don't upset the cartel and get away with it. The Premier League is a corrupt show but it's the only show in town unfortunately. Comrade 86 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now