Malagaram Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 Pep or if he cant be persuaded Klopp YouRams and ziggyram59 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggyram59 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 I would make Lee Carsley interim manager whilst The FA take there time in assessing candidates. I would love to see someone like Eddie Howe myself. Would prefer English manager over foreign manager unless it was Pep or Klopp. Rammy03 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 Step forward, the manager England needs.... Now, I know you'll mostly think that's trolling, but..... ziggyram59 and StockholmRam 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 1. Klopp 2. Pep 3. Poch 4. Gary O'Neil Chester40 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggyram59 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 6 minutes ago, Carnero said: 1. Klopp 2. Pep 3. Poch 4. Gary O'Neil The first 3 yes, O'Neil no what has he achieved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 4 hours ago, Stive Pesley said: Will be interesting to revisit this topic after the next tournament when his replacement has served us up the free-flowing, skilful players off the leash, attacking football that we are all clamouring for...and we've been knocked out early doors because we kept getting hit on the break by lower-ranked teams playing Southgateball At least it would br worth watching, unlike the abiding memories of the turgid stuff we've just had to (not) watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 1 hour ago, ziggyram59 said: The first 3 yes, O'Neil no what has he achieved? One less Premier League title than Klopp and the same as Pochettino, with about half a billion less to spend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester40 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 13 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: One less Premier League title than Klopp and the same as Pochettino, with about half a billion less to spend? O'Neil is quite similar to Gareth in many ways. Accomplished but not 'glamour' footballer. Workmanlike. Liked at all his clubs. He looks 'similar'. Good company man. Better track record as a manager but again not a glamour appointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 3 minutes ago, Chester40 said: O'Neil is quite similar to Gareth in many ways. Accomplished but not 'glamour' footballer. Workmanlike. Liked at all his clubs. He looks 'similar'. Good company man. Better track record as a manager but again not a glamour appointment. Our recent glamour appointments have been Erikkson and Capello. Very expensive flops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk Thrust Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 RoyMac5 and cstand 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester40 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 5 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: Our recent glamour appointments have been Erikkson and Capello. Very expensive flops. Agreed. Tbh they weren't experienced or conversant with our league, players, culture. Nor were they attacking managers who had much personality either. I'd absolutely love to see what Klopp could do with those players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 41 minutes ago, Chester40 said: Agreed. Tbh they weren't experienced or conversant with our league, players, culture. Nor were they attacking managers who had much personality either. I'd absolutely love to see what Klopp could do with those players. A German manager of the English national team 🤢 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottingram Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 Did a great job but think this was the right time. Carsley for me. Similar path trodden but slightly more progressive (admittedly it is easier to do that with U21’s) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Mackay Ate My Hamster Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 A serious question. Why can't you employ a fantastic man-manager, like even most of Southgate's worst critics accept, alongside a specialist tactician? It's as though if you can't do both you're considered a failure. Gareth excelled in most aspects of being England manager - a tough gig - but tactics wasn't his strong suit. Surely in these days of paying someone £5m a year to manage a national team , there are supreme tactical brains out there you could bolt on to the role for £1m salary a year? It's all a team effort surely? If we can see we need subs desperately at 60 minutes into a crucial game, but the manager stubbornly resists it, he should consult with his " master tactician ". Blindingly obvious? archram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 10 minutes ago, Dave Mackay Ate My Hamster said: A serious question. Why can't you employ a fantastic man-manager, like even most of Southgate's worst critics accept, alongside a specialist tactician? It's as though if you can't do both you're considered a failure. Gareth excelled in most aspects of being England manager - a tough gig - but tactics wasn't his strong suit. Surely in these days of paying someone £5m a year to manage a national team , there are supreme tactical brains out there you could bolt on to the role for £1m salary a year? It's all a team effort surely? If we can see we need subs desperately at 60 minutes into a crucial game, but the manager stubbornly resists it, he should consult with his " master tactician ". Blindingly obvious? You might be on to something here. They could even give him a fancy title, such as, 'manager assistant' or something like that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyBritishMidland Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 12 minutes ago, Dave Mackay Ate My Hamster said: A serious question. Why can't you employ a fantastic man-manager, like even most of Southgate's worst critics accept, alongside a specialist tactician? It's as though if you can't do both you're considered a failure. Gareth excelled in most aspects of being England manager - a tough gig - but tactics wasn't his strong suit. Surely in these days of paying someone £5m a year to manage a national team , there are supreme tactical brains out there you could bolt on to the role for £1m salary a year? It's all a team effort surely? If we can see we need subs desperately at 60 minutes into a crucial game, but the manager stubbornly resists it, he should consult with his " master tactician ". Blindingly obvious? Nothing wrong with that at all. As a leader, you don’t need to be great at everything, but be great at bringing in those around you that make up for what you lack. In fact, I’d say the managers job is about building the culture and environment to be successful. But he does need to set out his philosophy. How does he he want his team to look? What style of football does he want to implement? The manager can bring in the best tactician, but he will get the best tactics to suit the manager’s philosophy and strategy. That’s what the manager needs to set out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/ckvgljxvqdxo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 1 hour ago, Dave Mackay Ate My Hamster said: A serious question. Why can't you employ a fantastic man-manager, like even most of Southgate's worst critics accept, alongside a specialist tactician? It's as though if you can't do both you're considered a failure. Gareth excelled in most aspects of being England manager - a tough gig - but tactics wasn't his strong suit. Surely in these days of paying someone £5m a year to manage a national team , there are supreme tactical brains out there you could bolt on to the role for £1m salary a year? It's all a team effort surely? If we can see we need subs desperately at 60 minutes into a crucial game, but the manager stubbornly resists it, he should consult with his " master tactician ". Blindingly obvious? 1 hour ago, FlyBritishMidland said: Nothing wrong with that at all. As a leader, you don’t need to be great at everything, but be great at bringing in those around you that make up for what you lack. In fact, I’d say the managers job is about building the culture and environment to be successful. But he does need to set out his philosophy. How does he he want his team to look? What style of football does he want to implement? The manager can bring in the best tactician, but he will get the best tactics to suit the manager’s philosophy and strategy. That’s what the manager needs to set out. I think Ancelotti works like this at Real Madrid. FlyBritishMidland 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjam Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 11 minutes ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said: I think Ancelotti works like this at Real Madrid. I seem to recall someone that liked working with 'Carlo', regarded as the next Sir Alex Ferguson in some circles iirc. Good at putting cones out. DarkFruitsRam7, ariotofmyown and rynny 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted July 16 Share Posted July 16 6 hours ago, ziggyram59 said: Would prefer English manager over foreign manager unless it was Pep or Klopp. We’ll probably get plop ziggyram59 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now