PistoldPete Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 6 minutes ago, Abu Derby said: It’s happenin guys & girls! That's what Jimmy Savile said. Archied, Jortat, Derby4Me and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, David said: The EFL can't just dismiss the claims, but they can consider them not to be football creditors, which sends them down to the bottom of the pile next to myself and once the sale goes through it's settled. I know we've been round and round with this one, but if there is a firm bid how do Q go ahead with it? What do they do with B&Ws claims? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roboto Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Animal is a Ram said: No stadium involved? I guess they are putting the money aside to tackle the court cases and when they get thrown out (not if) they will possibly buy the stadium? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Ram Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Is this the Appleby bid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstand Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 1 minute ago, roboto said: No stadium involved? I guess they are putting the money aside to tackle the court cases and when they get thrown out (not if) they will possibly buy the stadium? But there aren't any court cases? CBRammette and Miggins 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawhillram Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Just now, Gritstone Ram said: Is this the Appleby bid? 1 minute ago, roboto said: No stadium involved? I guess they are putting the money aside to tackle the court cases and when they get thrown out (not if) they will possibly buy the stadium? Should drive Ashley to do something if he’s interested. If not goodbye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Tup Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 10 minutes ago, cosmic said: I know this doesn't mean much yet, but after the week we've had I'm going to enjoy this moment of optimism. It’s called madness buddy! I’ve progressed to complete insanity cosmic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 1 - I don’t know these guys are they Crooks ? 2 - 1 doesn’t actually matter at this point though does it? Ewetube, Jortat, IslandExile and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Appleby, Ashley, over to you…. Derby4Me 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malty Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said: Fine by me. It'll be all the sweeter when we take their claims on and they get laughed out of the room. I agree. I can’t believe these claims - in particular the Middlesbrough one - will stand up in a court of law. Especially if Gibson goes off on one about Derby systematically cheating (which they have found to be innocent of). Other than an annoying court case, any new owners aren’t really acquiring much risk in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 4 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: That is a major departure from the bidder information we know so far. Would certainly boil Mr Gibson's urine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 2 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: I know we've been round and round with this one, but if there is a firm bid how do Q go ahead with it? What do they do with B&Ws claims? I guess they just tell the EFL yeah it's fine, bring it on but in a more professional way. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black ('n' White) Sheep Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Full asking price you say? Jortat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roboto Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said: But there aren't any court cases? You know what I mean ? Would love to see Gibson lose his poo and a load of money challenging us when we aren't bound and gagged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, roboto said: No stadium involved? I guess they are putting the money aside to tackle the court cases and when they get thrown out (not if) they will possibly buy the stadium? It could be that, or it could just be that the stadium is a separate transaction. In theory, there's no reason it would be included in what you pay for Derby, since it's not owned by Derby. But obviously the MSD debt complicates things. Mucker1884 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 4 minutes ago, roboto said: No stadium involved? I guess they are putting the money aside to tackle the court cases and when they get thrown out (not if) they will possibly buy the stadium? I guess they have decided to sidestep that issue for now. Agree to pay rent on the ground and focus on binning off the more unquantifiable stuff with Wycombe and Boro. Win the case, then buy the stadium. Lose the case, then pay rent on the stadium? Mucker1884 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Tup Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 9 minutes ago, ram59 said: The thing is with the potential WW/Boro liabilities, is that if the new owners were to say 'see you in court', they should be in a 'no lose' situation. Obviously win the case and get your costs paid and also have a case for frivalous prosecution, but should we lose, we would have a cast iron case to bring against QPR, because a dangerous president would have been set, dangerous for football that is. There’s been a few dangerous presidents, barstewards! angieram and PistoldPete 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Just now, roboto said: You know what I mean ? Would love to see Gibson lose his poo and a load of money challenging us when we aren't bound and gagged. I know but when the tweets state erroneous facts it just makes me wonder. How will Q be able to deal with B&Ws claims? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 I cant imagine these people would be willing to take the risk without some pretty robust legal opinions/advice on the validity of the claims. Ramarena 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now