Reggie Greenwood
-
Posts
3,006 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Reggie Greenwood
-
-
21 hours ago, Bob The Badger said:
Very mediocre as I remember and kept out by George Williams.
I must confess I thought it was more, but on looking it up, he only played 25 games for Derby over 3 years never scoring.
Was upgraded by Arthur via John Gregory
-
-
1 hour ago, Kingpin said:
Without incurring -12 plus (potentially more) points.
Put into admin etc.
Lots manage to avoid this.
So far they have. Await plenty more in the coming months
-
1 hour ago, BaaLocks said:
Well I'd rather have a Chairman like Steve Gibson than the one we've got. He's using this to take us out the picture, five years ago we were one of the key teams in this league, next year we may well not even be in it. I'd say Gibson would consider that mission accomplished. You might not like this tactics or focus on us but is has proved effective and if it was the other way round we'd all be cheering him for outing a club not wanting to play by the rules.
You might have had a point if he had not been “ bending “ the rules himself and blowing parachute payments (twice)
-
9 hours ago, kevinhectoring said:
if he had decided to pay all the debt I don’t think we’d be in administration.
What Hoskin said I think was that MM had agree to waive all of his own claims against the clubThat’s what I meant ??
-
-
3 minutes ago, Reggie Greenwood said:
MM has apparently agreed to wipe off the debt owed to him ?
-
3 hours ago, Oldben said:
Maguire addressed Derby's recent appointment of administrators due to their financial difficulties, focusing on the club's debts.
In his words, “the estimates I've been provided range from low to mid-twenty [millions] of what is owed to the tax authorities.”
Your football debts are valued at £10 million.
After paying the first £35 million, a quarter of the remaining obligations, estimated at £5 million to £10 million, must be paid.
“And finally Mel Morris.
Mel Morris has now lent Derby County approximately £100 million.
If he wants 25% of that, the administrators will have to sell Derby County for £60 million for a team in League One that
doesn't own its stadium.
So where we are now is quite concerning.”
on top of which efl are looking to hit Derby with another load of points next year, when Derby are very likely to be in league one.
MM has apparently agreed to wipe off the debt ?
-
8 minutes ago, Tombo said:
Hmm...I don't subscribe to the GSE love in either but they brought our debts to zero, paid off the mortgage on the stadium, and then made their push.
It ties into what Mel said on the radio recently about making a big play "1 season in 4/5" rather than every season.
Dont think they paid off the Mortgage , Mel did later if I recall correctly
-
1 hour ago, ollycutts1982 said:
Moor farm is owned by someone else and is on a long lease and will continue to have use of it.
PPS is not owned by the football club but has a verbal agreement from landlord to continue to play games there.
Not looking to get rid of Rooney.
Positive conversations with Rooney and the coaching squad.
Opened positive dialogue with EFL. The EFL want Derby to continue but there will be further points deduction.
Said couldn’t rule out further deductions and would be working to reduce any. Didn’t directly say there will be. That’s the way I interpreted it.
-
24 minutes ago, SFox1993 said:
Mel actually said that we was 4 million over the allowed amount not that the deduction would be 4
Pretty sure I heard him say 4 mill breach which was 4 points. He could of misspoke or I miss heard or both ?
-
22 minutes ago, Raich Carter said:
Tell you what, let then crack on and we'll the do the same against QPR (or the EFL) for considerably more $ as they went into the Prem after demonstrably breaking the rules (i.e. they were fined).
And if you look back at it, I'm sure there are lots of other similar cases so let them go for it, if they win then there's no reason why we can't do the same and get, what, £150m back? Problem solved.
PS Obviously none of this will happen.
And Villa
-
1 minute ago, G STAR RAM said:
I dont think so, moving tax losses around a group is perfectly normal and legal.
But it’s not part of a group as far as I know. Seperate entity couldn’t be sure though ?
-
Just now, G STAR RAM said:
Bang on.
People in glass houses and all that.
I wonder what the EFL response would be if DCFC requested them to revisit that particular scenario?
And HMRC sure there will be tax implications
-
1 hour ago, DerbySmog said:
Bending the rules slightly ????
Just the same as Gibson did when he sold Boro’s debts to his own company. Not against the rules but bending them. No difference
-
-
2 minutes ago, Woodley Ram said:
I have no reason to not beleive Percy and the 9 points.
Gut feeling - 6 point deduction on the way with us signing up to an agreed business plan (amount paid on wages, number of players, transfer fees etc) including the right to audit.
The January window is going to be so important to us as injuries and fatigue will set in leaving us short of numbers and experiance.
I’m not accusing Percy of lying but the tweet and the article are ambiguous and as stated before if the EFL had an iron clad case why would the word negotiate appear ? They would just apply the punishment. Looks like as others have said politics and face saving on behalf of the EFL , who are seeing how far and hard Mel/ DCFC are prepared to push back especially if a takeover is hovering in the back ground.
A supposition with no basis in fact DCFC would accept a suspended 3 points as per the wages thing would be my hope -
16 minutes ago, The Scarlet Pimpernel said:
Was that always there Reggie or has it been added?
Always there on the tweet , I’d not seen the article but very ambiguous from Percy
-
Just now, Reggie Greenwood said:
I see alleged on this
-
7 hours ago, DCFC1388 said:
The article states breaches of financial regulations, no mention of 'alleged'
-
4 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:
Breaching financial regulations according to Percys article. What they are exactly nobody knows, but you would think they relate to the accounts and/or the P&S cycles considering the Accounts deadline this week
Alleged breach it said in the tweet/article. Just likes they alleged we valued the stadium wrongly ?
-
-
21 minutes ago, Icomeinpeace said:
And football in England was indeed called "soccer" originally but that is not the name that was officially adopted and agreed upon as the canon name for the game and the vagaries of a random printer's mis-spelling a hundred years ago not more dictates the name of a club for perpetuity than I don't know if your teacher wrote Philip rather than Phillip on your school report. But by all means sit in the corner of the pub chuntering in to your beer that "it is Notts - I read it once so there".... while the rest of the world just smiles in your direction, sighs and carries on with things that aren't utterly trivial.
I had come to offer some discussion, insight and exchange about the actual game
-
Just now, RadioactiveWaste said:
I read it as 9 points being the EFLs opening stance. DCFC obviously starting with "we've done nothing wrong"
So at a guess we'll end up between 3-6 deduction with more suspended.
Presumably also we are going to flat out refuse any kind of further EFL say in our business dealings. Costs have been cut is subsequent years so it's not really like resolving a current overspend.
It stinks but as I’ve said elsewhere I can understand the reasoning especially if a take over is near
Steve McClaren
in Derby County Forum
Posted
8 years for DCFC ? Don’t think so