Day Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSlate Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Am I reading this right? Quantuma saying EFL instruction is against the stated legal process? Rammy03, r_wilcockson and RoyMac5 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 what does this mean in legal terms "these disputed claims cannot be compromised"? RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Basically Boro and Wycombe and other clubs along with the EFL have stuffed us. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, Gee SCREAMER !! said: EFL are holding up the sale based on claims with no legal standing then. A new buyer seems happy to take the club on but the EFL - despite there statement- are classing these two twits as football creditors by their own decree. The admin haven't put sufficient funding in place assuming they would get this over the line today- that was an error. In the meantime, with interest, debts get higher. If we go under in the next week or two they get nothing. I agree with that apart from the administrators approach being an error. The EFL stance is outrageous and I’d understand if Quantuma hadn’t considered needing to cover some made up figure that Steve Gibson has pulled off Paddy Power and some fantasy accounting. r_wilcockson, Ramarena, David Graham Brown and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Stive Pesley said: what does this mean in legal terms "these disputed claims cannot be compromised"? I was wondering that. And if it's not part of contract law that they have to be, we should certainly make that a big noise. r_wilcockson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Tup Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 How on earth anyone can believe a word the administrators say, is simply staggering! RoyMac5, TheSlate, Arsene Titman and 3 others 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rammy03 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 So it's basically confirmed that it is the Boro and Wycombe claims that are holding everything up. Unbelievable. Genuinely unbelievable. duck THE EFL. Crewton, Andicis, David Graham Brown and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Can’t wait for next week at Boro, let’s make them know what we think inside and outside the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 By “statute” are we talking EFL rules, or law of the land? It’s not remotely clear from the statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSlate Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, Gritstone Tup said: How on earth anyone can believe a word the administrators say, is simply staggering! It's not the Admins that are the problem. Come on! FlyBritishMidland, GenBr, LauraH and 7 others 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarInToTurnRed Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said: what does this mean in legal terms "these disputed claims cannot be compromised"? It means what they are doing does not fit the law r_wilcockson, The Scarlet Pimpernel, Stive Pesley and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MK-Ram Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Putting Derby aside for one moment, putting MM aside from one moment, this is a moment all football fans should take notice of. This sets a precedent that if you fancy players at a troubled club, you can just stick a claim in against them. Forget tribal loyalty, this is truly horrifying. Crewton, KBB, RadioactiveWaste and 8 others 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curb Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 One Boro forum The Scarlet Pimpernel, Derby4Me, MackworthRamIsGod and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, TheSlate said: Am I reading this right? Quantuma saying EFL instruction is against the stated legal process? YES. There is nothing in the legislation to support this stance there taking, in fact there own rules prohibit it. There making it up as they go along. In the meantime, Stoke can sign our player despite ramming 30 million quid of covid losses into accounts that finish in May 2020. They can duck off. Ramarena, TheSlate, Indy and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, duncanjwitham said: By “statute” are we talking EFL rules, or law of the land? It’s not remotely clear from the statement. Statue is law as the law of the land. EFL ruels are not. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rammy03 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, Gritstone Tup said: How on earth anyone can believe a word the administrators say, is simply staggering! To be honest I'm now actually starting to think it is the EFL. Ultimately we're here because of Mel Morris let's not forget that. But the EFL are now stopping the club from being saved, literally. The administrators have an impossible job. Ramarena, RadioactiveWaste, r_wilcockson and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, TexasRam said: Can’t wait for next week at Boro, let’s make them know what we think inside and outside the ground duck em up, everyone of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 6 minutes ago, Indy said: I agree with that apart from the administrators approach being an error. The EFL stance is outrageous and I’d understand if Quantuma hadn’t considered needing to cover some made up figure that Steve Gibson has pulled off Paddy Power and some fantasy accounting. I mean funding for the foreseeable. not the fabricated liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarInToTurnRed Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, Gee SCREAMER !! said: YES. There is nothing in the legislation to support this stance there taking, in fact there own rules prohibit it. There making it up as they go along. In the meantime, Stoke can sign our player despite ramming 30 million quid of covid losses into accounts that finish in May 2020. They can duck off. Could what the EFL are doing therefore be considered Contempt of Court as the administration order is a legal process granted by a court. RoyMac5, Stive Pesley, Indy and 6 others 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now