mozza Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, Steve How Hard? said: I've just chequed and on no account can I sing this but I do agree with you. He bounced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 17 minutes ago, Steve How Hard? said: I've just chequed and on no account can I sing this but I do agree with you. 7 minutes ago, mozza said: He bounced. Im losing interest in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topram Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 He 100% gets clipped, probably not a penalty but think he fell over instead of diving. if he gets shame punishment than what Bamford got itll be embarrassing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 2 hours ago, Woodley Ram said: How much contact do you need for it to be a penalty, a foul is a foul and if it in the penalty area its a penalty. You dont get two penalties for a really bad foul or half a penalty for an accidental foul Now I like the sound of this ? A special "half penalty" where you have to pick a foot, hop on it up to the ball on the spot and try and hoof it thus falling on your 'arris!!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 As a few have already alluded to, it just smacks of Leeds running a bit scared and desperate. Funny considering only 4 months ago they were planning on winning the Champions League in 2 years time under Jack Duckworth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamsFan10 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Can't believe some of the outrage, hilarious watching leeds fans tweet the EFL trying to get him banned. In real life i thought it was a dive, having watched it back there is blatant contact on his left leg. He goes down easily, but that is not illegal when contact is made. In fact, if you have been fouled - like he was - it is a skill to make the referee give it (or at least it is considered a skill South American football culture). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 You have to ask yourself, 'why would Lawrence dive in that situation'? He would have scored and made it 3-1, easily. It just shows you how desperate Leeds are for getting one of our players banned. They know their luck for this season has ran out and that they are playing local rivals Barnsley next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 I’ve spoken to the penaltymeister himself Franny Lee and he says defo a pen ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJFern94 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 It wasn't a dive, if anything Lawrence is trying to avoid the tackle and ended up tripping himself up. But the fact remains that there was contact. Lawrence also didn't appeal for the pen, Wilson was the one who immediately turned around and appealed for it. Not a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 2 hours ago, Paul71 said: Agree thats the clip i saw, unless lawrence has a superb knack of flicking his foot back just at the right moment of course. ... whilst simultaneously sending telepathic messages to his opponents foot, to twitch a bit, at the same time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 1 hour ago, angieram said: Not very nice for Tom though, who is going to have the Leeds fans baying for his blood every time he gets the ball on Saturday. As if he hasn't got enough on coping with some of the Derby fans! Oh I don't know... We (not personally!) give him grief, and he proves a point by first scoring a goal, then cupping his ears. By my reckoning, That means that if DYS try the same tactic, he'll bag a hat-trick, and then show 'em his arse! Hope they give him hell, mesen! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie20 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 48 minutes ago, Topram said: He 100% gets clipped, probably not a penalty but think he fell over instead of diving. if he gets shame punishment than what Bamford got itll be embarrassing If you think 100% he got clipped how can that not be a penalty? Whether it's a leg-breaker or just a nick to put the player off balance it's a spotkick all day long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richinspain Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 40 minutes ago, DJFern94 said: It wasn't a dive, if anything Lawrence is trying to avoid the tackle and ended up tripping himself up. But the fact remains that there was contact. Lawrence also didn't appeal for the pen, Wilson was the one who immediately turned around and appealed for it. Not a ban. Shhhh, they'll want Wilson banned as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Ref was 4-6 metres from Penalty incident. End of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europia Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 4 hours ago, SuperDerbySuperRams said: I think he’ll be fine because there is contact (however small). My gripe with these retrospective bans is that they only mainly apply at championship level with games that are televised, due to the audience and the variety of angles offered. It’s like with VAR only being used in the FA Cup at Premier League grounds, it’s not offering consistency Yes there was contact, I thought that was clear on the replay. So I am not exactly sure what the argument is. The ref gave the penalty presumably because he saw that contact. If the penalty decision is deemed correct, what action could be taken against the player who was fouled ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavesaRam Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 4 hours ago, SuperDerbySuperRams said: I think he’ll be fine because there is contact (however small). My gripe with these retrospective bans is that they only mainly apply at championship level with games that are televised, due to the audience and the variety of angles offered. It’s like with VAR only being used in the FA Cup at Premier League grounds, it’s not offering consistency Here comes my two penneth: if you watch the replay, the defender goes to tackle with his right foot and misses, and then swings his left leg backwards towards our Tom, so there is deliberate intent to impeded him, so penalty, and yellow card for the intent. No chance of the yellow as he was already on one. Secondly, the authorities have form when it comes to decisions re Derby County. Remember the retrospective red card for Darren Moore when no actual offence had happened? At a time when retrospective cards had never happened, and to my knowledge haven't happened since? That took a key player out of the team at a crucial period of the season. And like Sky, they have in the past taken a shine to the Dirties, so there is precedent. Perhaps we should be asking for retrospective compensation for all the blatant, stonewall penalties which haven't been given this season, with a goal per penalty based on our penalty conversion rate (currently 100%). And where that affects the score, award us the extra points we would have got if the refs were any good at their job. Then we wouldn't be in the play-offs. Problem solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 59 minutes ago, Rampage said: Ref was 4-6 metres from Penalty incident. What a guy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 3 hours ago, angieram said: Not very nice for Tom though, who is going to have the Leeds fans baying for his blood every time he gets the ball on Saturday. As if he hasn't got enough on coping with some of the Derby fans! I'd relish getting abused by opposition fans. Let's hope Tom would too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, BurtonRam7 said: I'd relish getting abused by opposition fans... I bet that wouldn't be too difficult to arrange. Now and again, or every game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Hughes Hair Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, BurtonRam7 said: I'd relish getting abused by opposition fans. Let's hope Tom would too. You'd relish getting abused? Your neck seems to make a lot more sense now ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.