JfR Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 9 minutes ago, Phoenix said: Was he investigated for trying to deceive the officials? To be fair, he was booked at the time so there couldn't have been retrospective action. I still don't get that one though, that you only get a yellow for trying to deceive an official but failing but get a 2 match ban if they buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, JfR said: To be fair, he was booked at the time so there couldn't have been retrospective action. I still don't get that one though, that you only get a yellow for trying to deceive an official but failing but get a 2 match ban if you are a victim of the deep state conspiracy to keep Leeds utd in the championship . FTFY. To be serious a moment though, rules should be based on actions rather than consiqences and I agree with your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Taking the mick now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 37 minutes ago, JfR said: Taking the mick now Is that that TV show with that twit who stopped supporting Watford (?) and started supporting Chelsea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, AndyinLiverpool said: Is that that TV show with that twit who stopped supporting Watford (?) and started supporting Chelsea? I didn't write 'twit'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, AndyinLiverpool said: Is that that TV show with that twit who stopped supporting Watford (?) and started supporting Chelsea? He left it years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 39 minutes ago, AndyinLiverpool said: I didn't write 'twit'. It should auto correct to "Leeds fan" as opposed to "twit". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tibbs Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 I'm not sure how people watch replays where there is clear contact and still come up with rubbish like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BondJovi Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 14 minutes ago, Mr Tibbs said: I'm not sure how people watch replays where there is clear contact and still come up with rubbish like that. People have always seen what they want to see but how they can't see the contact is baffling. This whole thing has gone beyond pathetic. I still don't get it. You see loads of penalties given for less every weekend but no one cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandadsawbloomer Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Why did the 3 referees reviewing this claim just agree to take no further action. They should have supported the on field referee and come out and stated that all the available evidence made it obvious that he had made a correct decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 40 minutes ago, Mr Tibbs said: I'm not sure how people watch replays where there is clear contact and still come up with rubbish like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 21 minutes ago, Grandadsawbloomer said: Why did the 3 referees reviewing this claim just agree to take no further action. They should have supported the on field referee and come out and stated that all the available evidence made it obvious that he had made a correct decision. It shouldn't really be necessary for them to do so. Tom was never charged nor was it announced by the FA that the penalty was being looked into, so I think it's normal that the FA, after what is a routine inspection of multiple incidents, wouldn't bother to make a statement. They didn't make a statement about there being nothing to answer for, even, that was only reported by various non-affiliated media outlets. Really, the fact he's not been charged should be the end of the matter, though with it carrying on as it has done, I can understand your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europia Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 On 08/05/2019 at 19:03, Mr Tibbs said: I'm not sure how people watch replays where there is clear contact and still come up with rubbish like that. Absolutely, there was contact and the ref was in the right place, correctly awarding a pen. End of (or should have been) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Slight Murmurings on twitter suggesting one of Toms close relatives has died, hope it’s not true....poor lads had enough crap over the last few days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remy the hare Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 I would think if twinkle toes tommy is brought down in the box today it’s gonna have to be a stonewall pen for the ref to give it. The ref will defo think twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Remy the hare said: I would think if twinkle toes tommy is brought down in the box today it’s gonna have to be a stonewall pen for the ref to give it. The ref will defo think twice. Yep and that probably what some of this campaign from Leeds has been about. All part of the mind games........that said some of them are just wet lettuce leaf wanna be victims! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.