Carnero

The way we set up it was more a case of Jozwiak being in support of Byrne.
It's understandable because Byrne's crossing is of such a high standard, it doesn't really help Jozwiak much though. Lots of people just see 'winger', check the goals/assists and judge entirely on that.
What's very clear from watching Poland is that Jozwiak is very much told to stick to the touchline wherever possible, for us he was told to move inside to make way for Byrne.

Sums things up nicely....

Highly unlikely any overseas subscribers will cancel, why should we?
£25/month incredibly reasonable for seeing most of the games on Rams TV, the ones that are on sky are shown on ESPN+ so I only miss cup games.
I would pay twice the new amount gladly and watch the games on my phone iPad or TV, great value indeed.

It was far too cheap before compared to what UK subscribers have had to pay to watch the same thing.
£25 per month to have access to most home and away games for the entire season still sounds a reasonable price.

Afternoon Rick.

How much was it before? If it was £12.50 per month, or lower, for live video subscription you overseas guys (and IP fraudsters) have been having a laugh.

... and the manager who signed him being sacked 10 games later.

If Rooney walks.
Even though I don't want him at the club, the fact he is still here indicates things are progressing on the takeover front & that the news on the penalty (the severity of which I'm certain the club will be aware of) isn't as bad as first feared.
Rooney is an unashamed careerist & there's no way he would stay if a) there were no funds to bring in players/was going to lose players and/or b) a substantial penalty incoming. Too much potential damage to his brand and ambition & he's already got a ready made narrative of 'keeping us up'. His media pals will do their duty talking up his stint & protesting we're an impossible job.

... and the manager who signed him being sacked 10 games later.

... and the manager who signed him being sacked 10 games later.

I've read some right nonsense about this lad on here and on Twatter and the like. IMO, he's a talented young lad and we're lucky to have him. Hopefully he can really kick on this season as it must have been a proper baptism of fire last year.
It's often the case that young players coming from abroad take a season to settle in and I think with Bielik's injury, being stuck away from home under lockdown, playing in a side so short of confidence, not to mention reading some of the garbage spewed about him in the dark recesses of social media, it really can't have been easy. If we actually play with a bit of tempo this season, I can see him doing really well. His work ethic is superb and that earns him some credit with me irrespective.

Can he play centre back?

Can he play centre back?

Here's a cracking golf shot for all you golf lovers...
 

How many more times does he have to prove he can do it for Poland before people start to believe that maybe, just maybe, it's Rooney's tactics that affect him at Derby? 

No one remembers the fact that the entire group stage of Italia 90 was absolute dog excrement, all they remember is that we should have won It. 
We were shocking against the Swiss in 96 and the sweaties, got out played by Spain but It is still seen as the best tournament ever…
no one will care that we got a 0-0 draw against the skirt wearers when we go on to win the tournament. 

I love that midfield!

That's really the essence of the EFL's problem. Virtually everyone else uses the straight line method but, as you say, other methods can still comply with FRS102. The EFL could have, and should have, specified a method in the FFP rules so as to provide conformity when dealing with what are clearly large numbers. We didn't do it wrongly (per our auditors), just differently, but that was enough for Gibson to perceive it as cheating and pressure the EFL to take action against us.

It's about 400 pages. 
Intangible assets (values of rights etc) is about 7 pages. 
And like all such documents, amortisation is tackled obliquely in bits by going on about the measurement of value on acquisition, and subsequently. What the term of amortisation should be etc etc
What I think you would like to point to is section 18.22, which is basically writing down what amortisation is, states that you should amortize using a systematic method based on consumption of economic benefits and only at the end states that "if the pattern cannot be determined reliably then the straight line method will be used". 
Lots of undefined terms. Systematic method. Reliably. Economic benefits. 
So no, I see no codification of amortisation rules in any of that. Lots of principles, scope for opinion and judgement and therefore differences in interpretation to emerge. 

We have a signed auditors report saying that they do comply with the Companies Act, so ?‍♂️

48 not out from Du Plooy eases us to victory, great to see him playing well again.

We have a signed auditors report saying that they do comply with the Companies Act, so ?‍♂️

4 different managers can't all be wrong. 
If he turns it around at Hull under his ex-Peterborough boss then so be it, but it doesn't mean it was ever going to turn around for him here. No doubt if he does come good at Hull there'll be plenty on here and other social media platforms eager to point fingers of blame at the club and none at Marriott, as is always the way with know-it-all football fans.
 

4 different managers can't all be wrong. 
If he turns it around at Hull under his ex-Peterborough boss then so be it, but it doesn't mean it was ever going to turn around for him here. No doubt if he does come good at Hull there'll be plenty on here and other social media platforms eager to point fingers of blame at the club and none at Marriott, as is always the way with know-it-all football fans.
 

I am just done with this, do your worst EFL and move on to your next victims.
Sick of this rolling on and on, either step up and deliver a punishment. We can then appeal and we move on.
These clouds of uncertainty are weighing heavy and I for one am sick and tired of being the whipping boys for a select few. 
 
The club have bent the rules but not broken them unlike many others of the decades.
Let the EFL punish us to save face, they’re a vindictive and spiteful bunch and can never be found and proven to be inadequate. They keep on pushing until they receive some sort of victory no matter how big or small. 
 
Hit us with your best shot and then duck OFF to your next targets ????