RoyMac5 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Chester40 said: Decent game for 0-0. Derby dominated possession and at times really kept them hemmed-in. Poor final ball meant we didn't create much and just as it felt like we were about the force their defence open, they hit us on the break and the pressure went. Cashin started sloppily and then found himseld getting absolutely roasted. Left for dead 3 times and we were lucky they had their own version of Theo Robinson. Dead balls were really poor today. Our flair players had an off day and a draw was probably fair. Tues is a big game now. Missing Fozzy? Edited January 20 by RoyMac5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 44 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: Depends on how you define clear cut chances. We did create a few but we didn’t do enough with them to really trouble their keeper. As for “could have lost 3:0 or 4:0 easily” well we didn’t and that’s all that matters. The one Cashin cleared off the line - well that’s what good defenders are meant to do when faced with that situation. The only chance they really fluffed was when the chap with the funny hair cut was through on Vickers and put it over. ”could have lost 3:0 or 4:0 easily” makes it sound like we were played off the park. We weren’t and a draw was probably a fair result. Thats a reply to someone so look back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester40 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 3 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Missing Fozzy? Hadn't considered that...hmmm. Cashin somehow kept finding himself matched up one-on-one and isolated. So possibly.. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 I think we'd have done much better if we'd worn the green kit. We seem to play quite well in that. I'm sure there will be stats somewhere of our performances by kit......😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 6 minutes ago, Caerphilly Ram said: Ah, I wasn’t clear enough, no I disagree with your assessment of the match and your comment that the players didn’t turn up. Who turned up? No midfield again cash stuggled with the striker should of had help,and doubled up? Yet they were great, got battered and didnt change our formation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lagavulinram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Good game, bit frantic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Can anyone tell me the 3 shots we had on target because it must of been a long piss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 11 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Thats a reply to someone so look back Eh? Sorry, I’m not sure what you’re saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caerphilly Ram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Who turned up? No midfield again cash stuggled with the striker should have had help,and doubled up? Yet they were great, got battered and didnt change our formation The players wearing a Derby County shirt that had more possession of the football, passed it more accurately, had more shots and more corners than their opponents, and kept a clean sheet away from home earning a point…. You’ve not presented much of a counter argument to change my mind so I guess we have to agree to disagree. Zag zig, DavesaRam, SKRam and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Who turned up? No midfield again cash stuggled with the striker should of had help,and doubled up? Yet they were great, got battered and didnt change our formation Got battered 0-0 with 34% possession. Righteo Caerphilly Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 11 minutes ago, Chester40 said: Hadn't considered that...hmmm. Cashin somehow kept finding himself matched up one-on-one and isolated. So possibly.. Almost like their manager did his homework and set them up to create that situation because our reliance on playing with width leaves us susceptible to getting done through the middle. Playing with width is fine, I'm ok with that approach,but a better team than Lincoln will exploit that weakness in the middle if we keep allowing it to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Who turned up? No midfield again cash stuggled with the striker should of had help,and doubled up? Yet they were great, got battered and didnt change our formation One thing we didn't get was "battered". "Battering" is what we gave Oxford in the 2nd half at the Kassam. You can't batter a team with 34% possession, though you can create chances through fast breaks and long-balls, which is what Lincoln did. Gabby'sThighs, Tamworthram, SKRam and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrycav81 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 5 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Can anyone tell me the 3 shots we had on target because it must of been a long piss Nelson header, hourihane shot from outside box and Collins shot that keeper turned round for a corner all in the 1st half off the top of my head. Our best chance of scoring was actually 10 seconds into the second half when barkhuizen was clean through but for some reason Sibley chose not to play a simple pass to him and went down the middle to Collins instead G STAR RAM and Caerphilly Ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, Crewton said: One thing we didn't get was "battered". "Battering" is what we gave Oxford in the 2nd half at the Kassam. You can't batter a team with 34% possession, though you can create chances through fast breaks and long-balls, which is what Lincoln did. Yes but dont forget long balls and fast breaks are frowned upon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 16 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: Who turned up? No midfield again cash stuggled with the striker should have had help,and doubled up? Yet they were great, got battered and didnt change our formation They created the better chances but if you think they were “great” and we got “battered” I suspect you don’t watch much football. Strikes me that you’re having a bad day or something buddy. My advice would be to hold off posting anything else until tomorrow when the dust has settled. Advice I wish I’d taken a few times in the past. SKRam and Caerphilly Ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: Yes but dont forget long balls and fast breaks are frowned upon... Any goal scored with fewer than 10 passes in the build up should be disallowed by the ref. SKRam and G STAR RAM 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: They created the better chances but if you think they were “great” and we got “battered” I suspect you don’t watch much football. Strikes me that you’re having a bad day or something buddy. My advice would be to hold off posting anything else until tomorrow when the dust has settled. Advice I wish I’d taken a few times in the past. They had 1 on 1s what better chance did we have? ( i am a little smashed so fair point) Edited January 20 by Dcfcsr92 The () i might be wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caerphilly Ram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Dcfcsr92 said: They had 1 on 1s what better chance did we have? How many of them did they score? Echoing @Tamworthram’s sentiment, you seem disproportionately wound up by us drawing a game away at Lincoln. The game is done, we didn’t lose, try to accept it and move on, stressing about it now won’t change a thing. Tamworthram and Dcfcsr92 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, Dcfcsr92 said: They had 1 on 1s what better chance did we have? Did I say we had better chances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfcsr92 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Just now, Tamworthram said: Did I say we had better chances? Just trying to say we were poor thats all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now