BucksRam Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Jimbo Ram said: He is right to a certain extent, he and the Gibbon aren’t responsible for the debt…..but what he conveniently fails to add is that his and the Gibbons spurious claims are preventing the sale of the club…. Yep. Complete spin to deflect from the actual issue. No one denies the debt. Kathcairns, Jimbo Ram and I know nuffin 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 Just now, BucksRam said: Yep. Complete spin to deflect from the actual issue. No one denies the debt. Which would have been cleared by the new ownership without the laughable claims ? r_wilcockson and BucksRam 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 5 minutes ago, BucksRam said: Yep. Complete spin to deflect from the actual issue. No one denies the debt. Need more swearing practice? Or just outright laughter. FFS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said: Need more swearing practice? Or just outright laughter. FFS! “Pretty simple” - not wrong there. Jon Bon Pony, CBRammette, Adslegend and 7 others 1 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I know nuffin Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 25 minutes ago, alexxxxx said: I doubt the admins haven't done this. I can't imagine why they wouldn't have done it. And finally I don't know why it matters. If they contact might think their legal advice would say it could give credence to the claim. Why make contact with people we owe nothing too SaffyRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I know nuffin Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 Anyone want to bet that whichever way this goes for us the EFL will change their rules to stop it happening again Ram a lamb a ding dong and Indy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 20 minutes ago, Jimbo Ram said: Which is what I said…… Not quite the same. You said he was correct in making that statement. I simply added that no one had actually accused them of what he was implying in making that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 9 minutes ago, I know nuffin said: Anyone want to bet that whichever way this goes for us the EFL will change their rules to stop it happening again If we win they probably won’t need to change their rules. But a settlement is now more likely and if that’s how it ends up, you may well be right ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 50 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: As @Jon Bon Pony rightly said - not to CH but to the EFL. But the EFL have ongoing updates on our funding situation so equivalent to real time accounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 4 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said: If we win they probably won’t need to change their rules. But a settlement is now more likely and if that’s how it ends up, you may well be right ... How so? The other creditors would undoubtedly object. europia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Ram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 28 minutes ago, Indy said: “Pretty simple” - not wrong there. He is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 30 minutes ago, Indy said: “Pretty simple” - not wrong there. Are you joking cosmic, ThePrisoner, i-Ram and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R@M Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 Keep it non offensive….but if anyone would like to explain to the Ambulance chaser what this means…..and give him an understanding of how this is NEVER going away until justice is done….it might change his mind. Twitter @petecouhig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 (edited) 43 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: How so? The other creditors would undoubtedly object. You are right that the admins have legal advice confirming that we should win, so they can’t pay out major amounts in settlement. But what they CAN do is pay modest amounts because they won’t recover all their costs and because of the ‘vagaries of litigation’. So a likely outcome now (predicted by @B4ev6is in a post this morning) is that the 2 weasels will settle for modest amounts funded by the talents of dear Luke Plange; and that they will then crow in the press that they magnanimously had pity on us in our hour of need. That’s when we all vomit But that’s only provided the buyers are not saying - “no, settlement is not enough. We are so freaked out by these claims that we need them adjudicated in your favour. Because only then do we know that there are not more in the woodwork “ if they are saying that our stress levels have not even begun to peak. Because if this goes to trial we might live or die by the result Edited January 31, 2022 by kevinhectoring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawhillram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 2 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said: You are right that the admins have legal advice confirming that we should win, so they can’t pay out major amounts in settlement. But what they CAN do is pay modest amounts because they won’t recover all their costs and because of the ‘vagaries of litigation’. So a likely outcome now (predicted by @B4ev6is in a post this morning) is that the 2 weasels will settle for modest amounts funded by the talents of dear Luke Plange; and that they will then crow in the press that they magnanimously had pity on us in our hour of need. That’s when we all vomit But that’s provided the buyers are not saying - “no, settlement is not enough. We are so freaked out by these claims that we need them adjudicated in your favour. Because only then do know that there are not more in the woodwork “ if they say that our stress levels have not even begun to peak. Because if this goes to trial we might live or die by the result I can accept any verdict if reached in a fair, transparent and independent manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinhectoring Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 13 minutes ago, StrawHillRam said: I can accept any verdict if reached in a fair, transparent and independent manner. No ! These claims are bogus and we can only accept one outcome !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Tamworthram said: Not quite the same. You said he was correct in making that statement. I simply added that no one had actually accused them of what he was implying in making that statement. The statement he made was correct, regardless of its relevance or whether or not anyone had suggested they were….. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 1 hour ago, RoyMac5 said: Need more swearing practice? Or just outright laughter. FFS! Now THAT is comedy gold. Sadly those with the brain power of a single celled amoeba will believe every word. RoyMac5, ThePrisoner and Ram a lamb a ding dong 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 48 minutes ago, Jimbo Ram said: The statement he made was correct, regardless of its relevance or whether or not anyone had suggested they were….. Did I say it wasn’t? I was just questioning if anyone had ever alleged they were responsible and then I went on to suggest a reason he had said it. I can’t believe we’re debating this when effectively I was only adding to your post not challenging it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 31, 2022 Share Posted January 31, 2022 2 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: Did I say it wasn’t? I was just questioning if anyone had ever alleged they were responsible and then I went on to suggest a reason he had said it. I can’t believe we’re debating this when effectively I was only adding to your post not challenging it. Not really sure your comment added much to my point but not worth debating any further ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now