Southampton vs Derby FA Cup 3rd Round Replay match thread

[Richard246]

As a defender does Bogle know he has to stop crosses???

I don't think he does

[Ellafella]

Just now, ck- said:

The number 4's chest looks like it's level with Waghorn's boot.

I think his right testicle was playing Waggy onside. ?

[Sith Happens]

2 minutes ago, Andicis said:

Unfortunate that the goal was ruled out, but correct decision ,Waghorn's foot was off.

So far, this game has been a reasonable summary of our season. We've played pretty football in patches, but we've given the ball away several times at the back, been slightly sloppy and not created too much. We had one lovely move where Mount skied, but it would have been our goal of the season if it came off, the build up play was beautiful.

I hope we can keep this up in the second half, but create more, because in the final third we're definitely lacking.

Not against the shoulder though.

[Sexydadbod]

English media criticising VAR and accusing it of being dodgy in order to justify removing it from English football, even though the English FA are to blame for not following FIFA’s introductions and not correcting the proper version of VAR.  You couldn’t make it up. Maybe they should vent their frustration at the FA instead of the technology. This agenda against Var makes me sick. 

[Andicis]

Just now, Paul71 said:

Not against the shoulder though.

I would say it looked just off.

However, isn't the VAR rule meant for clear and obvious errors? The fact that even on replays it's hard to tell, how can it be clear and obvious? 

[AdamRam]

Impossible to say if it’s on or off, therefore benefit should go to attacking team - VAR used right is a good addition to the game, at the moment though it isn’t on both accounts 

[Sparkle]

1 minute ago, Curtains said:

It has to be a part of the body you can use so arm is NA but shoulder is 

Onside.

Diabolical decision 

You can score of any part of your body so long as it isn’t deliberate handball 

[toddy]

First 20 mins we were awful and the saints showed their glass but they dat off and we took over. Shame about the goal though not standing.

[Carl Sagan]

Every TV pundit saying the goal wasn't offside and should have stood. Terrible decision. Meanwhile, here's the stats: 62% possession, 285 passes at 83% completion. Twice the number of shots and twice as many on target. 

Just furious at the VAR fiasco. 

 

[ossieram]

1 minute ago, Richard246 said:

As a defender does Bogle know he has to stop crosses???

I don't think he does

Any points about the good stuff we've done?

[Andicis]

Just now, McLovin said:

English media criticising VAR and accusing it of being dodgy in order to justify removing it from English football, even though the English FA are to blame for not following FIFA’s introductions and not correcting the proper version of VAR.  You couldn’t make it up. Maybe they should vent their frustration at the FA instead of the technology. This agenda against Var makes me sick. 

You're spot on. VAR was used pretty damn well at the world cup, we should have used the same here as was used there with the same rules around it. 

[Philmycock]

6 minutes ago, RamsFan10 said:

That’s just a picture showing the fact he is offside

Inconclusive, foot v shoulder

[alexxxxx]

Need to change offside rule to be feet to clear this up.

[Sexydadbod]

8 minutes ago, BurtonRam7 said:

Danny Murphy is a complete tool isn’t he.

He makes me want to stick pins in my ears. I’ve never known a commentator to make me so angry inside. It isn’t just what he says, it’s the tone of this voice that makes me want to punch my TV.

[Ramslad1992]

Bet Charlie Austin isn’t moaning about VAR now is he?! 

[DcFc Dyycheee]

Loads better performance with Tom Huddlestone in the side. Should play every game. 

[Ruud Aralliss]

Good first half tho, easy to forget it’s a championship v premiership game

[StringerBell]

2 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

You can score of any part of your body including your hand if the ball deflects in so long as it isn’t deliberate handball 

Not deliberate offside then.

[Kernow]

Whether or not it was offside isn't the issue for me, it's how long the decision took. If it takes three minutes to make a decision then it's not clear enough to warrant a decision like that. You're holding up the game, killing the momentum and leaving the paying spectators sat there for minutes without any clue on what is happening.

I'm a fan of the idea of VAR, but it shouldn't be implemented in its current form. Why is it fair that it exists only in PL grounds? If we had scored that goal in the first game, it'd have stood, but because it's at a Premier League side then they warrant a more detailed inspection.

[ck-]

2 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

You can score of any part of your body so long as it isn’t deliberate handball 

That's a very interesting observation!