Jump to content

curb

Member
  • Posts

    2,671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by curb

  1. 33 minutes ago, ThePrisoner said:

    Good spot, but that’s understandable in normal circumstances, but if not selling them meant we went out of business, then it could be the best option. It’s just like a preferential bidder staking the money to keep us going, whoever buys us would know that money is already spent. They wouldn’t be putting any more in, it just means the money they would have put up would be needed next season. 

  2. 34 minutes ago, Bobby said:

    But aren’t you still losing 1 million a month, surely (and it’s not just Derby) out goings have to be less than incomings.?

    This is where the whole “allowed to lose £39million over three years “ falls down, teams actually work to that, Why? Surely they should be working at at least breaking even. It only takes a minor blip to screw it up and put teams over.

    wasn’t it Risdale who included qualifying for the champions league every year in Leeds Budget?

    It has taken QPR 7 years to get anywhere near sustainability and we are still losing money each month, sooner or later players and more importantly agents are going to have to come to terms with receiving less money or half the league will end up in the position you are currently at.

     

     

    So for a start you have to accept that you are never going to compete with the six or seven clubs that are getting parachute payments every season, which is a massive gap in income, plus the clubs who have currently signed players that they can’t afford. 
    Any club unilaterally looking to break even are going to be at a huge disadvantage and would be lucky to be in the top half of the Championship, let alone think about promotion.

    There are only so many rough diamonds you can find in the lower leagues, and as we have found recently, having a great academy doesn’t get you anywhere when the recent rule changes mean Liverpool or Chelsea can poach your best prospects for peanuts.

  3. 2 hours ago, BoroWill said:

    There absolutely is a standard amortisation policy used by football clubs.

    Although the one used by MM wasn’t, and still isn’t against any EFL or general accountancy rules, the policy MM used was passed as OK by a DC which made up of experts in the field of accountancy. So, under pressure from Gobshite, the league appealed to an LAP, which consisted of no experts in the field, who unsurprisingly found it breached a general accountancy policy which doesn’t even mention the amortisation policy used by DCFC, which incidentally had been signed off for three years by the league themselves. Finding us guilty retrospectively also gave us no opportunity to adjust our spending to bring it in a line with a different method of amortisation.

    oh, and the original claim by Gibbon face was against the stadium sale, which we were also not guilty of breaching any of the current EFL rules.

  4. 14 minutes ago, vonwright said:

    Well perhaps but we (and the MPs) at least need to put focused pressure on the EFL on this point. Even if we accept there are a number of obstacles to a sale, this removes a massive one at a stroke. MFC and WW get their claims heard in an impeccable legal forum. And Morris is potentially liable, not the ruined club he left behind. We need to push them on this because (assuming it is at all legally possible) then explaining why it's a bad idea is going to be very, very hard for them.

    I agree with you 100%, but the only way they’ll have a chance of winning is in their kangaroo court.

  5. 39 minutes ago, 86 Hair Islands said:

    You must be new around here ?

     

    Odd isn't it? I'll always follow my beloved Rams but I don't even watch the Premier League games anymore. I don't much bother with the CL either save for the final stages and even then, only if there's domestic interest. I remember religiously watching MOTD as a kid, even when Derby weren't involved. Not watched it years, though I do, I confess have other 'hobbies' these days. TBH, if this is the end of Derby County, and FWIW, I'm certain it's not, I'd walk away from the game and never give it a moment's thought.

    Same

  6. 51 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

    I cannot think of a single reason why they would do that, unless it's to save face the the rest of the world's population.

    Money, 33,000 turning up tomorrow, 2-3000 at away matches and on TV every other week.

    They want to kick us, kick us some more, kick us while we’re on the floor, but not wipe us out completely, because

    money 

  7. Does going to watch Grimsby a few times in 70s count?
    It was only when I couldn’t get to see the rams, and my gran lived there.

    other than that no, I haven’t even got a least worst team.

    and my dad took me to the BBG when I was 5 and put me in the boys end, and my first away game when I was 8, St. Andrews 1970.

    and his dad supported The Rams, not sure about his dad though, he died in the first war.

×
×
  • Create New...