Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, gfs1ram said:

The Last Leg

@TheLastLeg

The Last Leg is back with a BRAND NEW series this Friday! What stories should we chow down on this week? Send us your #IsItOk tweets now!

 

From a great idea by R@M on the Media thread.

Come on guys we should be swamping their twitter feed !!

Done. Have linked to the Mail article so they can see the detail and kept the accompanying tweet concise. 

02D64857-DD98-49DE-9E99-7619C5F9B89F.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Indy said:

Done. Have linked to the Mail article so they can see the detail and kept the accompanying tweet concise. 

02D64857-DD98-49DE-9E99-7619C5F9B89F.jpeg

Just read the article.

 

Brilliant - dissects the weakness of the two clubs' cases. 

 

Counter-factual history is always ball cocks, and you can't claim £40m based on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PistoldPete said:

I don't agree on either front. A lower bid for the club means creditors get less.  None of the unsecured creditors wil get anything until we come out of admin. And if we accept low ball offers now for players w m ay never come out of admin because the poetntial buyers of the club will have nothing worth buying.

Fair enough, but my point was that as things stand, and unless another solution is found, the quickest way out of admin is to accept a low bid from someone who is willing to take the risk.  Not suggesting player sales, just pointing out how some small creditors might view the situation.  Also, just because someone puts in a low bid in return for accepting the huge liabilities and risks going forward, that doesn't mean they are short of cash, just that they don't want to pay over the odds for a business with so MANY risks and liabilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WhiteHorseRam said:

Just read the article.

 

Brilliant - dissects the weakness of the two clubs' cases. 

 

Counter-factual history is always ball cocks, and you can't claim £40m based on it.

Stand down everyone! “Brunners” has entered the chat with a well-evidenced riposte. I can’t be bothered engaging with this one. 

1A2249E0-A6B8-453C-B75D-3FD041ACBB76.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Indy said:

Stand down everyone! “Brunners” has entered the chat with a well-evidenced riposte. I can’t be bothered engaging with this one. 

1A2249E0-A6B8-453C-B75D-3FD041ACBB76.jpeg

Just say to him that not many men would have their Twitter profile pictures with their daughter - #bitweird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PistoldPete said:

Someone quoting Martin repton mp saying news on takeover this afternoon.

Don't over-promote him - Martin Repton is a local councillor not an MP - though hopefully he has an inside line on some of the discussions.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PistoldPete said:

He’s an MP so you would hope he has some ITK stuff and wouldn’t just make stuff up. Then again….

 

Just a correction, he's a Councillor and has been for years and years.

Massive Derby fan, and a principled bloke, would definitely not have him down as someone looking for attention.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...