Ramarena Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, Spanish said: that from the Simpsons in Paris? if so why are they going the wrong way around the roundabout? They've all just left the Joiners after a liquid lunch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richinspain Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Srg said: Awful, poorly written without a proper ending. 1 hour ago, Nuwtfly said: It explains absolutely nothing and, if anything, only confuses me more. I only posted the link, I didn't say that they were actually reporting anything ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, TuffLuff said: If I remember my Simpson’s correctly I think it’s a scene from the time they visit London for some reason maybe, I know there was one episode in Paris where they stayed on the island for hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyPowell Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 39 minutes ago, cosmic said: "...and you said that automatically you are always going to fire them, the financial implications are a nightmare" This is all you need to know. The difference in 'punishment' is purely down to money, not ethics. theres nothing like taking something out of context.MM was explaining how a player coulddeliberately get himself sacked so he could go play for another team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyPowell Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 16 hours ago, Tyler Durden said: Keogh was well within his rights to refuse to take a pay cut as per any other ordinarily employed worker. Whether Derby were within their rights to then sack Keogh is something that remains to be seen. it doesnt remain to be seen they have sacked him. Theres 79 pages in this forum proving it.Is there anyway back not on your life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 17 hours ago, Tyler Durden said: Keogh was well within his rights to refuse to take a pay cut as per any other ordinarily employed worker. Whether Derby were within their rights to then sack Keogh is something that remains to be seen. They didn't sack him because he wouldn't agree to a new contract. They sacked him for gross misconduct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 I've skipped half a dozen pages ,have I missed anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, King Kevin said: I've skipped half a dozen pages ,have I missed anything? Yes MM saying he was poked in the chest by a fan in the Yard saying you should have sacked Lawrence and Bennett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePrisoner Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 23 minutes ago, King Kevin said: I've skipped half a dozen pages ,have I missed anything? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwram1973 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 hour ago, King Kevin said: I've skipped half a dozen pages ,have I missed anything? Nope, It's like groundhog day in ere ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmic Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Curtains said: Yes MM saying he was poked in the chest by a fan in the Yard saying you should have sacked Lawrence and Bennett You seem really shook by this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, cosmic said: You seem really shook by this. Is that anyway to treat our owner. I don’t think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 2 hours ago, cosmic said: "...and you said that automatically you are always going to fire them, the financial implications are a nightmare" This is all you need to know. The difference in 'punishment' is purely down to money, not ethics. Also says "So it's not as simple as people think when they think about these issues. And I actually think, in the case of two of the lads,they have to come out and face our crowd every game now and the only way they can improve on this is on the field, that's all they can do." Suggesting he thinks the reception they receive (and will continue to) at games and around Derby itself will be partly punishment as well - And that by playing games and doing well for the club they can serve some kind of penance I think people keep acting like Keogh's injury is his punishment - It's not - Him getting the injury stupidly is what we're punishing him for (in part) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBRammette Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 If investment is close could this be settled beforehand if possible as often loose ends tied up? Perhaps avoiding another publicly embarrassing case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyPowell Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 hour ago, King Kevin said: I've skipped half a dozen pages ,have I missed anything? no he is still sacked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 3 hours ago, Curtains said: Lawrence wouldn’t be without a club long as he’s a top player. Bennett the same . Correction for you Lawrence wouldn’t be without a club for long because he is an average championship player with an agent. Bennett wouldn’t be without a club for long because he has an agent and is an average division 3 player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coneheadjohn Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 3 hours ago, Curtains said: Lawrence wouldn’t be without a club long as he’s a top player. Bennett the same . Lawrence definitely. Bennett... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 25 minutes ago, MuespachRam said: Correction for you Lawrence wouldn’t be without a club for long because he is an average championship player with an agent. Bennett wouldn’t be without a club for long because he has an agent and is an average division 3 player. Average. Better than Gary Micklewhite or Gordon Hughes. Bet that’s stumped you. PS The Championship is a good league despite what Ramage thinks. Better standard than the players if yesteryears Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 11 minutes ago, Van Cone De Head said: Lawrence definitely. Bennett... Bennett is ok . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coneheadjohn Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, Curtains said: Bennett is ok . He is,I was trying to be amusing...I know it wasn’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.