Jump to content

JfR

Member
  • Posts

    2,342
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JfR

  1. 8 hours ago, TigerTedd said:

    There are other clubs that own other clubs though aren’t there. Don’t the Man City owners own loads of different clubs round the world. Didn’t they loan frank lampard to New York or something?

    and the guy looking to buy Man Utd owns other clubs. But swapping plates between these clubs only really seems to happen with Forest and Watford on a regular basis. Other clubs could do it loads, they just choose not to. I doubt that’s a moral choice, so is there some sort of rule preventing them?

    I think some of those other clubs do it more than people think, it's just not as obvious as the Watford/Udinese or Forest/Olympiacos connections, probably because in a lot of cases the English club is the larger club doing most of the favours for smaller foreign clubs. Man City, for example, signed a 26-year old called Mix Diskerud from their sister club New York City in 2018. During the season he was signed, he was on loan at Goteborg to provide "salary relief" to NYC, but with them still paying a big chunk of his wages. He signed for Man City, and they immediately sent him back to Goteborg on loan. It didn't really benefit Man City - he never even made an appearance for the Man City first team - but it was likely quite inconsequential monetarily for a team of their size compared to the advantage it gave to a smaller club in NYC.

  2. 21 minutes ago, LERam said:

    Forest did similar last season, selling a player at overinflated price.

    What's this all about though? Feel like it's a con but can't work it out? If they get relegated will they turn the loan perm and give forest a cash injection?

    IMG-20220823-WA0016.jpg

    Probably more of a hand from Forest to Olympiacos, this time. 5m would actually be quite a high fee for modern Olympiacos to spend on one player. 

  3. 9 minutes ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

    Those comments.  Derby SOLd thE stadium to THEDSELDES and broke de Rulessss.

    Err..... no

    The irony is that the stadium sale deal was probably a lot fairer than this. In our case, we needed independent valuation by a third party to sell the asset. In Watford's, they can pay whatever they want.

    I don't think these deals should be off the cards entirely - it's reasonable that two clubs under the same ownership would sometimes genuinely want to trade between each other without other motives - but, as with the stadium deal, there should be restrictions on how these deals are carried out and/or accounted for.

  4. 45 minutes ago, Stuniverse said:

    Were the three substitutes used against Sunderland U21s all trialists?

    Tamplin (for Brailsford, 71), Fevrier (for Burton, HT), Qureshi (for Hawkins, 81).

    Not used: Evans and Roberts… so we must’ve been really down to bare bones with two goalkeepers on the bench.

    Source: https://www.dcfc.co.uk/news/2022/08/match-report-derby-county-u21s-0-4-sunderland-u21s

    Could be. Jayden Fevrier was released in summer by West Ham, and Jaami Qureshi by Brighton, so wouldn't be surprised if both of them have been offered trials here. Not so sure on Tamplin.

×
×
  • Create New...