Gaspode

So we know that they haven't been submitted do we? Could be that we have submitted them but the EFL won't lift restrictions until they've reviewed them and decided they're fit for purpose (and we all know the speed that the EFL work at if they're of a mind to be difficult)....think people need to stop assuming things and wait for some communication from the club or the EFL....

So we're going to decide on the best interests of the club because a bloke that's employed to come up with clkick-bait headlines reckons it's what will happen? Good grief....

Anyone who thinks administration is the answer I feel does not understand the full implications of this process. 

So we're going to decide on the best interests of the club because a bloke that's employed to come up with clkick-bait headlines reckons it's what will happen? Good grief....

So we know that they haven't been submitted do we? Could be that we have submitted them but the EFL won't lift restrictions until they've reviewed them and decided they're fit for purpose (and we all know the speed that the EFL work at if they're of a mind to be difficult)....think people need to stop assuming things and wait for some communication from the club or the EFL....

So we know that they haven't been submitted do we? Could be that we have submitted them but the EFL won't lift restrictions until they've reviewed them and decided they're fit for purpose (and we all know the speed that the EFL work at if they're of a mind to be difficult)....think people need to stop assuming things and wait for some communication from the club or the EFL....

So we know that they haven't been submitted do we? Could be that we have submitted them but the EFL won't lift restrictions until they've reviewed them and decided they're fit for purpose (and we all know the speed that the EFL work at if they're of a mind to be difficult)....think people need to stop assuming things and wait for some communication from the club or the EFL....

Oh, I see. Well, I do. 
I think that a lot of the arguments on here are because some people insist on posting their opinions as though they are truths.

Used to be lots of culture in McTurks - not so much since the introduction the annual food hygene inspections.....

Well it was meant as a joke, but as you evidently need it explaining:
Less people with the app means less people being pinged - which means less people isolating or having tests - which would potentially mean less identified cases as a larger number will be carrying on regardless and not be aware they've got it (so actual cases may be be higher if less people are having tests).
The stats you quoted look positive, but without supporting explanation are meaningless.....

I worked with someone who lived next door to Stephen Ireland (Man City) - not the sharpest pencil in the box. He apparently had a great big fountain installed in the driveway outside his house - so big that it blocked part of the drive and he couldn't get one of his cars out of the garage....

Could’ve been worse - they could have insisted you wore clothes as well….

Could’ve been worse - they could have insisted you wore clothes as well….

Could’ve been worse - they could have insisted you wore clothes as well….

Could’ve been worse - they could have insisted you wore clothes as well….

Could’ve been worse - they could have insisted you wore clothes as well….

The old codgers will have had to sign it off, but it's got marketing 'executive' fingerprints all over it.....Tacky, style over substance, and completely unnecessary is your marketing man's bread and butter.......

The old codgers will have had to sign it off, but it's got marketing 'executive' fingerprints all over it.....Tacky, style over substance, and completely unnecessary is your marketing man's bread and butter.......

The old codgers will have had to sign it off, but it's got marketing 'executive' fingerprints all over it.....Tacky, style over substance, and completely unnecessary is your marketing man's bread and butter.......

I hate everything about it. The marketing is cringe inducing. They have team DJs. If the ECB are correct and this is what cricket needs to become to avoid dying, I'd prefer if we just suffocated it with a pillow.

I don't read the Mail and have no intention of starting now, but I suspect the reforms are more to do with the flagrant disregard that a large number of people seem to currently have for the Official Secrets act. Cummings for example - to work in the position he did, he must have signed the OSA, yet is more than happy to appear on prime time news channels telling the world things that should be confidential.
I've worked with numerous government departments and have signed the OSA - in addition to the mandatory Security clearance required, pretty much every department will insist on security training to remind everyone of their responsibilities and what they are allowed to say or do. They all include a written commitment to not disclose any information that could be considered confidential. The rules are so strict that I'm not even allowed to tell people in my own organisation about the work I'm doing. Quite how Cummings and numerous ex-MPS are allowed to sing like canaries is astonishing and if a review of the OSA means they can lock someone like Cummings up for 14 years, then bring it on....

Sorry - you're right.
The police said 31-year old and then Everton said it was one of their players.
And then they said it wasn't Delph!
Bit silly... It's like playing guess who and there is only one card left.

Initially there was a report that a 31 year old PL player had been arrested - Everton (no doubt following pressure from the media who will know full well who is involved) then released a statement that a member of their 1st team squad was 'helping the police with their inquires'.
I don't believe Everton did anything wrong or could really do anything else as the story developed....people on Twitter looked at their squad list and came to the conclusion it was one of two 31 year old players involved....if you want to get angry, blame the twitterati for their speculation....

I don't read the Mail and have no intention of starting now, but I suspect the reforms are more to do with the flagrant disregard that a large number of people seem to currently have for the Official Secrets act. Cummings for example - to work in the position he did, he must have signed the OSA, yet is more than happy to appear on prime time news channels telling the world things that should be confidential.
I've worked with numerous government departments and have signed the OSA - in addition to the mandatory Security clearance required, pretty much every department will insist on security training to remind everyone of their responsibilities and what they are allowed to say or do. They all include a written commitment to not disclose any information that could be considered confidential. The rules are so strict that I'm not even allowed to tell people in my own organisation about the work I'm doing. Quite how Cummings and numerous ex-MPS are allowed to sing like canaries is astonishing and if a review of the OSA means they can lock someone like Cummings up for 14 years, then bring it on....