tinman
-
Posts
985 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
tinman got a reaction from FlyBritishMidland in The Administration Thread
They wouldn't turn down an offer if there wasn't a better one on the table
-
tinman got a reaction from Indyram in The Administration Thread
OF course not. The Administrators haven't told the EFL anything new
-
tinman reacted to Crazy in Relegation rivals watch
It kind of both is and isn't. It's based on something called regression to the mean. Managers are often sacked when teams have had a run of underperforming. So it is likely that their form will shortly return to their true ability.
Therefore the new manager will likely get better results than the previous manager did in their last few games. However, it is also true that if the manager hadn't been sacked, they also would have likely got improved results.
So yes, there is such a thing as new manager bounce, but no, it isn't necessarily anything to do with the change in manager.
-
tinman got a reaction from cstand in Academy Thread 21/22
Only if you’re in Loughborough. Apparently the viewing figures for this match will decimate those for the spurs v Everton match.
-
tinman got a reaction from rammieib in Academy Thread 21/22
Only if you’re in Loughborough. Apparently the viewing figures for this match will decimate those for the spurs v Everton match.
-
tinman got a reaction from angieram in Academy Thread 21/22
Only if you’re in Loughborough. Apparently the viewing figures for this match will decimate those for the spurs v Everton match.
-
tinman got a reaction from TigerTedd in Academy Thread 21/22
Only if you’re in Loughborough. Apparently the viewing figures for this match will decimate those for the spurs v Everton match.
-
-
tinman reacted to SaffyRam in The Administration Thread
If I was in the middle of sensitive negotiations with bidders, I wouldn’t be speaking to the EFL either, because Nixon would be reporting the conversation ten minutes later.
-
tinman reacted to Topram in The Administration Thread
Sounds bad them not communicating to the EFL but I’m pretty sure the Admin team think the EFL are the ones spreading news to the journalists etc so they probably want to keep it hush till the final meeting… I hope anyway
-
tinman reacted to TuffLuff in The Administration Thread
I think you can somewhat suspicious of the administrators, or frustrated with how they go about stuff…but I 100% don’t trust the EFL
-
tinman reacted to rammieib in The Administration Thread
At least we are allowed to use the lights/electricity on the grass again!
-
tinman reacted to hintonsboots in The Administration Thread
Who told you, without giving names/roles etc ? Is it reliable information?
-
tinman reacted to Carl Sagan in The Administration Thread
I think Rooney has been too honest and open in the past, to our detriment (eg giving the EFL an excuse to weigh in and impose more restrictions). Whether or not he's spoken with the admins, this is the right line to take.
-
tinman got a reaction from Ravabeerbelly in Academy Thread 21/22
Can you two stop flirting and just get a room?
-
tinman got a reaction from G-Ram in v Millwall (H) Match Thread
We got poohoused in true Rowett style. They packed their defensive third and aimed to counter.
-
tinman got a reaction from Ellafella in v Millwall (H) Match Thread
We got poohoused in true Rowett style. They packed their defensive third and aimed to counter.
-
tinman reacted to Wistaston Ram in The Great Escape
Sorry I'm out, by all means copy Sheffield Weds chants, but please not the band!
-
-
-
tinman reacted to May Contain Nuts in The Administration Thread
Seriously pushing the limits as to how many times two people can say exactly the same thing to each other using a slightly different arrangement of words.
Can you not just take the debate to PMs now?
-
tinman got a reaction from Steve How Hard? in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure what’s more boring. the chat about interpretation of clauses or the chat about accountants
-
tinman got a reaction from EtoileSportiveDeDerby in Stars on the shirts
Why stop at 2? Why not have 21?
-
-
