Tyler Durden

Yes am beginning to believe that the administrators plan was wholly based around a preferred bidder being named and now they aren't going to materialise any time soon for whatever reasons that's been flushed down the loo.

The43 last time they spoke to Rams Trust this was the last question ans answer -
11 Next Meeting
When will the next meeting with the fans take place?
We suggest week commencing 17 January. Date to be agreed with Ang Allen.
 
So perhaps they'll wait until Monday.

Yes am beginning to believe that the administrators plan was wholly based around a preferred bidder being named and now they aren't going to materialise any time soon for whatever reasons that's been flushed down the loo.

Absolutely spot on. Simple "what if?" / Risk Analysis. The Admins are paid big money and you'd think they would assess every possible scenario. Not just go to the EFL will 1 proposal when there's a few snake oil salesmen sat around the table.

OK let me rephrase my question, until a takeover happens do the administrators have a plan on how to fund the club and if so what is it?

I am offering him redemption ( does he read this forum though)

And he's not skint, Mel Morris is not insolvent. He also owns a large stadium.

He has no morals hence the reason why we are in this mess in the first place.

Passing round buckets on Saturday?

Isn't it quite simple, the administrators show how they intend to fund the club over the course of the season then the embargo gets lifted?
Whats particularly complex about that for a team of administrators- unless they don't have a plan?

Isn't it quite simple, the administrators show how they intend to fund the club over the course of the season then the embargo gets lifted?
Whats particularly complex about that for a team of administrators- unless they don't have a plan?

Careful everyone. It's non PC to make derogatory remarks about a person's appearance or the posts will get deleted.
Waiting with baited breath to see if the person in question is the Nottingham Forest manager then that's OK though.

Petrocelli 

By the same logic are we not then going to raise a small claim against Mel Morris as well?

Petrocelli 

Don't be pathetic.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Everyone knows it's Notts Forest.

By the same logic are we not then going to raise a small claim against Mel Morris as well?

By the same logic are we not then going to raise a small claim against Mel Morris as well?

By the same logic are we not then going to raise a small claim against Mel Morris as well?

Apologies the article I quoted is from the news desk.
I've made two mistakes,  firstly by quoting from a BBC website and secondly believing that the Beeb would report the same information on two of their own conduits. 

It's a good point - what law have we broken? We (to put it bluntly and at a basic level) cheated at a game of sport. Not illegal, and a matter for the governing body of that sport to deal with. Which they have - hence our fine and points deduction
It's yet another failing of the EFL that they aren't putting Boro and Wycombe back in their boxes. It's wrong and damaging behaviour for the sport if  teams to start trying to sue each other.

I wonder if we got a fee for him. They were pretty desperate it seems so maybe we scraped a few hundred grand out of them 

£100k for a home game on sky, divided by ave. ticket price (£20?) = 5,000 fans. Doubt we lose 5,000 who would otherwise have bought a match ticket, 1-2,000 maybe.

The administrators are administering the running of the club but wouldn't say that they owned it. So my answer would be nobody. Tin hat on at the ready.

The administrators are administering the running of the club but wouldn't say that they owned it. So my answer would be nobody. Tin hat on at the ready.