Jump to content

nick_d

Member
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Woodypecker in The Administration Thread   
    It might be bloody-minded of me, but if Quantuma have (finally) been allowed to name a PB - after the EFL & Boro blocked it for 2 months, IMHO in a calculated fashion, and caused squad decimation and the prospect of liquidation, I'd be minded to decline the EFL bustards.
    I hope the fan groups demand a prompt approval of the PB. And an apology.
    The EFL fudged and farted their way along the transfer window, on strings manipulated by Gibson, until the damage was done and last-ditch interventions via MPs etc were required.
    Maybe the EFL are now conscious of the attention that will turn upon themselves and they want to 'make friends' with fan groups perceived to be capable of wielding influence over the DCFC fanbase. No anti-EFL petitions, please, look how we solved it for you!
    Parry & Co can burn in hell.
  2. Haha
    nick_d got a reaction from RoyMac5 in The Administration Thread   
    WTF am I going to do all day now?
  3. Haha
    nick_d got a reaction from England Ram in The Administration Thread   
    WTF am I going to do all day now?
  4. Haha
    nick_d got a reaction from cstand in The Administration Thread   
    WTF am I going to do all day now?
  5. Haha
    nick_d reacted to PistoldPete in The Administration Thread   
    Fantastic news! Those two great guys have sorted it. 
  6. Cheers
    nick_d reacted to Animal is a Ram in The Administration Thread   
    https://www.dcfc.co.uk/news/2022/02/derby-county-update-11th-february-2022
     
     
  7. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Day in The Administration Thread   
    Yet again fans are looking for answers to questions and you’re trying to shut those down with information that you can’t prove, having caught up with the topic there is multiple examples of this.
    You attempted to shut down my Football Creditor topic, an issue which is clearly relevant and been picked up on both by MP’s and the media, even yesterday one MP telling the EFL to tread very carefully as they could remove the Football Creditor status for everyone and forced to operate like a usual business. A threat that has come from the EFL’s insistence on us treating both Boro and Wycombe’s claims of football debt.
    Regulation 4.4, a regulation which Middlesbrough’s lawyers sent to Mel Morris, omitting a key line that says only the EFL can take action, yet you believe the regulation to be a non issue as it’s just on good faith. Please explain why the Middlesbrough lawyers used that in their letters to Mel Morris to form their claim if it’s not relevant, have you seen the claim and have a better understanding of it than the clubs lawyers?
    And here we are again, trying to say bilateral contracts exist between clubs, which again just isn’t true. This is true in the Premier League hence why it’s written for all to see, it’s also been seen in court with cases between clubs. Yet you will not find a single line of proof this exists from the EFL, nor will you have any examples of clubs suing each other in the EFL because it just does not exist.
    Please, please, stop spreading misinformation whilst we as a community of fans within the fanbase are trying to find answers from the EFL, it’s not helpful and completely counter productive as we try to help save our club.
  8. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Eatonram in The Administration Thread   
    Needed saying. Some solidarity needed here.
  9. Haha
    nick_d reacted to mozza in The Administration Thread   
    At least the 'George Thorne Thread' was in the main, 'entertaining'. This thread is what I'd expect convicts on Death Row to be having, with the occasional visit from the 'victims' family.. 
     
  10. Clap
    nick_d reacted to kevinhectoring in The Administration Thread   
    That tells you a lot though doesn’t it,  that we don’t know the details of his claim?
    The truth here is not difficult to discern. Gibson and Morris detest each other. The reasons are lost in the mists of time and who cares? 
     
    But we, Derby, are now in the position where - but for these claims - our club would have been sold in January. 
     
    You say that Gibson has no desire to see Derby fold. You’re missing the point. The point is, his vendetta against Morris has pushed our sale back, he has trashed Rooney’s transfer window and he has put us at serious risk of liquidation. Our club is collateral damage in his nasty, squalid scrap and that is not acceptable to us. And I believe Gibbo also calculates that if he damages us, MM will be forced to pay for the repair, and he likes that. We see what has gone on and it is not acceptable to us.   
     
    All is revealed in Gibson’s open letters - cleverly drafted by his PR and legal team. They are disingenuous, misleading and largely irrelevant to whatever the claim might be. And with each letter, the goalposts move, now it’s FFp, now it’s the stadium. (Don’t worry, we know Morris’ letter is not much better.) There is nothing confidential in his claim, so why has it not been articulated in the public arena? We know the answer. 
     
    Even Couhig (whose behaviour is possibly even more revolting than Gibson’s) has had the sense to realise that to threaten a claim in these circumstances and without fully articulating it is beyond the pale. 
     
    The outcome here will most likely be that MM will put in place arrangements to indemnify the club, that those arrangements will remain in place for several years at significant cost to Morris and that the claims will never be brought. (Mission accomplished for Gibbo, the worst kind of playground bully.)  And that Couhig will slither away to begin another attempt to exploit some legal system or other. 
     
    Our owner has done a few shameful things in recent years. Nothing on the scale of what yours is currently up to 
     
     
  11. Clap
    nick_d reacted to CBRammette in The Administration Thread   
    Its brave of you to come on. We all know the issues under MM's tenure - he conned us all too but the problem is we as a club have been punished so very very much by the EFL in various ways. Only Derby fans know the detail of everything that has been done.  So Unfortunately the "Derby are all cheats" line pedalled by your chairman and others saying we still need to punished more via these claims is why we have such a totally negative view of your chairman. We have no funds to settle a claim and having to do so will lead to liquidation - other creditors wont agree to a proposal where they get less. So SG's actions and soundbites do not reflect just how much we have been punished already by the EFL and how perilously close to extinction we are. You seem certain he will withdraw the claim when we get to the wire. We are across the wire in no-mans land in broad daylight wearing a fluorescent jacket and still he persists. So that explains our hostility to him 
  12. Clap
    nick_d reacted to ilkleyram in The Administration Thread   
    @BoroWill- the reason your owner is seen as the villain of the piece is because he is.  Not because of his views of Mel Morris and not because of his previous views and comments of our club's profligate spending - you will find many/most Rams fans (no doubt some late to the party) who agree with him on both counts - but because he is and has been for many months deliberately making it impossible for us to move to new ownership without us slugging him a considerable amount of money (anything between £7m and £45m) for a perceived competitive gain, when even your own fans believe that your failure to gain a play off place that season was largely down to Pulis and a sporting/player/results failure on your part.
    We have been roundly punished by the EFL's processes for our financial splurge; we have spent the vast majority of the last 3/4 seasons under a transfer embargo; we've had 9 players leave this transfer window alone, most against their will; we're down to the bare bones from a squad perspective; we're likely to get relegated despite the fantastic effort that the players are putting in to avoid that happening.  Is not all that and more, punishment enough?
    Yet, for your owner, this is personal.  He doesn't care that the club, our club, is suffering, that good people are out of work, that a fan base is suffering. The proof of that is that he is continuing with a claim that is at its very, very best, purely speculative.  If he relaxed his claim we could, probably, get new owners in place, sort out creditors, be relegated and under EFL control for two more years but at least move on.  He won't let us because he doesn't like Mel Morris and wants to see Mel Morris suffer. And that is it pure and simple, and that is why he is, whatever your protestations to the contrary, the villain of this piece.  It's time for him to show some leadership, move on and concentrate on his own club.
  13. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Day in The Administration Thread   
    Will try not to bombard you with questions, but out of interest as a Boro fan do you:
    1) Believe that Derby/Morris owe Boro/Gibson compensation for the stadium sale, which gave us an unfair financial advantage?
    2) If yes to the above, would this not mean you are owed compensation by Sheffield Wednesday also, due to the fact they sold their stadium also and beat Boro at the Riverside. 
    3) What are your thoughts on the EFL's handling of the situation and why Boro/Gibson chose to withdraw legal action against the EFL.
    ------
    Looking at Boro forums there strong dislike for our club, which is bizarre as I found topics back in 2020 urging Gibson to drop the cases and you didn't deserve the play offs nor had any chance of going up.
    Just from a personal point, I have nothing against Boro the club, which is you the fans, players and staff until you reach Gibson.
    I can't speak for everyone, but imagine a few would share those views and when we say Boro, or revel in your defeats, it's purely aimed at Gibson and this legal action which we feel is ludicrous.
  14. Clap
    nick_d reacted to StarterForTen in The Administration Thread   
    Maybe he doesn't, but it does appear that he feels that the Club (or perhaps Mel) has not yet paid a sufficiently high a price for the historical financial breaches for which they have accepted a punishment on.
    Makes you wonder what is the price he'll accept - and I'm not talking about a monetary figure for compensation - it's all about sporting sanctions. So is that liquidation? Is it relegation? Is it the complete dismantling of the squad and a reset position so far down the scale that you need binoculars to see where you have come from?
  15. Clap
    nick_d reacted to May Contain Nuts in The Administration Thread   
    He'll only accept it if it goes through the EFL's arbitration system, not a proper legal system.
    If he didn't want our club to go out of business there would be no claim, or there would be claims against other clubs too. There would be no hiding behind EFL processes.
  16. Haha
    nick_d reacted to BoroWill in The Administration Thread   
    Long time since I posted on here but I logged in to agree that this is by far the most sensible solution that all sides should be pushing for. Morris is the root cause of your problems and our (and Wycombe's) ire. He shouldn't hide behind the convenience of UK company law to avoid having to fix the mess he made.
    I'm aware that you will all have strong views on Gibson but I'm 99.9% certain he would support this kind of arrangement, he doesn't want your club to go out of business. 
  17. Clap
    nick_d reacted to ollycutts1982 in Wayne Rooney   
    Wayne Rooney, every time you think he cannot go up any higher in our estimations he goes and absolutely smashes it. I’ve said it so many times but there is genuinely no one else I’d rather have at the club. The man oozes class and commitment. 
     
    What a bloke. I bloody love him. 
  18. Haha
    nick_d reacted to PistoldPete in The Administration Thread   
    500,000 have been EFL checking up on us.
  19. Haha
    nick_d reacted to Indy in The Administration Thread   
    I broke whilst waiting for a brew. Kept it simple for him. 

  20. Haha
    nick_d reacted to uttoxram75 in The Administration Thread   
    Got to drive to pick the missus up at 5.20. After that, ill be pulling a beer up and spamming Boro fans all ducking evening.
    I imagine the single malt will be about by 9pm and ill be banned form multiple sites by 10pm.
     
  21. Haha
    nick_d reacted to Shuff264 in The Administration Thread   
  22. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Bald Eagle's Barmy Army in Message to Quantuma   
    I'm sure somebody from Quantuma will read this.
    I think the way they've handled what can only be described as 'a situation they'll probably never have to deal with again and made difficult in many ways' very well and they seem to be the only ones who come out of this with any credibility.
    We as supporters are obviously wanting answers everyday but that's not possible. I also believe that the admins was taken down a garden path by the EFL who led them to believe we could name a preferred bidder until the goalpost was changed last minute.
    The EFL would have been laughing at Wayne Rooney after hearing his press conference last Thursday knowing that after the Quantuma's meeting with the EFL, we wouldn't be announcing a preferred bidder.
    It's clear as day that the EFL, Boro and Wycombe are trying to turn DCFC fans against Quantuma - Don't let that happen, Quantuma IMO have been very good in all of this and deserve some huge praise. We heard it from Owen Bradley that these guys are doing everything they can.
    As a supporter base we've been excellent all season but even more so in the past 7 days - Let's keep sticking together and one day very soon, we'll get rewarded and the future will be black and white, without any doubt. 
  23. Clap
    nick_d reacted to Duracell in Steve Gibson trying to liquidate Derby   
    I think you can just stop there.
    I remember the sucker punch of the 2014 playoff final. It hurt not just because of what happened in the 90 minutes, or Keogh's mistake, or Zamora's finish, but because we were a sensibly-run club living within our means against a team of over-paid and over-priced players clearly there to pick up a pay packet. It really, truly felt like the 'wrong' team won, and QPR were effectively rewarded for cheating.
    At no point did I ever want QPR to be liquidated, threatened with expulsion, or relegated to the third tier. My gripe was never with QPR fans, and for the crimes of Tony Fernandes, I wouldn't want a community to lose its club, Loftus Road to become derelict, or see 140 years of history turn to dust just because of the immorality of a handful of board members who happened to be at the club at the time.
    It's not worth engaging with any Boro or Wycombe fan who cannot see that; those that want the scene of the crime punished rather than the criminals themselves aren't true football fans. They are prepared for an entire community to suffer as the fall guys and girls just to make themselves feel better about their own club's shortcomings. There is nothing you can do or say to change their mind, it's already made up.
  24. Haha
    nick_d reacted to swanny in The Administration Thread   
    if we do end up settling with those two shower of poo clubs just remember that we have for the past ten years regularly gifted millions of pounds to undeserving championship rivals and got little or nothing in return. That was called our 'Transfer Policy" 
  25. Haha
    nick_d reacted to MickD in Sheffield United (H) Matchday Thread Saturday 15th January 3pm   
    Can't say Mun(c)h about this. ☺️


×
×
  • Create New...