Jump to content

Shuff264

Member
  • Posts

    6,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,464 profile views
  1. Definitley light in midfield and at left back. Personally would like to se JWP in there but was never likely to be included. Will be interesting to see how we line up in midfield, maybe get away with Bellingham - Rice - Maddison against weaker opposition but you would need someone along side Rice when play a France for example. Very strong going forward, Solanke unlucky to be behind Toney.
  2. To add to the set pieces, does anyone know how many goals we have scored from our long throws this season? The success rate seems to be phenomenally poor, verging on pointless.
  3. Another inept performance, I would say one good performance this calendar year away at Exeter, our home form continues to be poor. Our inability to build pressure and create chances from open play is a real concern, we just invite pressure onto ourselves by continually giving the ball away from poor passing and attempted dribbles. Line up worried from the start as we set up so defensively, never looked liked creating much. Cashin had a good game defensively but isnt a left back, I don't know what Wildsmith was thinking but Charlton only get the chance after Bradley puts two aimless balls into midfield. A lot of people giving credit to Smith, fair enough he was alright but I don't think he adds enough to the midfield, he isnt a great tackler or passer, hes just kind of ok. For anyone interested in xG, thats out 8th game in a row we've recorded an xG of under 1.
  4. 5 defenders and 3 defensive midfielders at home...
  5. Knibbs, Wing and Smith were three I really wanted in the summer. Can't see how Reading would've been able to pay more than us?
  6. Wildsmith and Vickers are a similar level of shot stoppers, but I think Wildsmith is clearly ahead in the air and with the ball at his feet.
  7. I don't think that performance is too far off from for we have been playing for a while, we've just been relying on someone doing something brilliant to drag us through. NML looks off it, as he did around this time last season which is a worry as he has so often been out difference maker
  8. Thought it was a very similar game to Rovers, turgid first half where neither side showed any real quality and then we improved second and deserved it overall. Still lacking in overall performance, but we can take comfort in 3pts. I did miss the goal because I was in Port Vales delightful portaloos, but oh well. NML, Wilson, Fornah were standouts for me, Collins and especially Hourihane had off days (Seriously Conor, can you beat the first man from a set piece?)
  9. Its an ambitious film, I will grant him that, but it is definitely a "Miss". Its a shame, we get so few good historical films.
  10. A far more accurate representation of the Duke Of Wellington
  11. It's not a good film anyway, and if you care about history like I do, it's a painful watch.
  12. We weren't great, but we were good enough to beat Rovers and deserved the win. Still worried about our attacking play as it is so one dimensional, and our inability to progress the ball from deep is a real concern. We were only able to create chances once the game became stretched, against a low block we still look clueless. Defence had a good game, thought midfield was fairly nonexistent aside from Bird, looked better once Fornah came on, and in attack we are entirely reliant on NML. A good 3pts but not necessarily a great performance.
  13. Tunisia, Mali and South Africa. Think you mixed up Namibia with Gambia!
×
×
  • Create New...