Jump to content

MACKWORTHRAM

Member
  • Posts

    2,523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MACKWORTHRAM

  1. 43 minutes ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

    Seems he's playing tonight.  Clearly this is going nowhere soon if that's the case.  Bet he get's 2 goals as well and any chance of a move evaporates, Recruitment on a striker has to be quick, as you always get other interest, or, they do something that stops the move like getting a hat trick.  We seem to be recruiting forwards at the pace of a snail on ketamine.  

    Where have you seen that he's playing tonight mate?

  2. 31 minutes ago, Ambitious said:

    Assuming Bird isn't available if talks with Hull progress: 

    I expect the team to be: Wildsmith; Nelson, Bradley, Cashin; Forsyth, Robinson, Smith, Ward; NML, Hourihane; Collins. 

    If it was me, I think I'd pump the breaks on wing backs when our only real LWB is injured (or not fit enough to start) and we're in the process of shifting the player we had groomed for the 10 role. 

    I think I'd go for a 4-3-3 with Ward and NML on the wings: Wildsmith; Forsyth, Bradley, Cashin, Wilson; Smith, Hourihane, Robinson/Rooney; NML, Collins, Ward. 

    Tough situation, but if we can just survive the game and grind out three points then that would be a minor miracle given the circumstances. 

    A minor miracle to survive a game against Wigan with that side? Behave.

  3. 6 minutes ago, inter politics said:

    If we have a limit of 300K per signing, then it's going to be very difficult to replace Bird. Do we take the chance of keeping him, going up and then more chance of him signing a new contract or take the money before possibly losing him on a free.

    We may or may not have a 300k limit. Think someone alluded to it could be Warne playing games so other clubs don't try and fleece us.

    But if we do. That's now. If we sold Bird and added another £2-£3 million in to the mix then we would probably have a bit more than 300k to spend.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Rich3478 said:

    Think bird has had long enough to kick on so wouldn’t be against this with a year left for a decent fee usually.

    however any money got from sales doesn’t seem to be helping strengthen the squad currently. Think we need a midfielder without bird leaving, would be two if he goes. 

    with timing of this I do think would be a pretty big setback. 

    Agree with you here mate. I'm hoping that if we did get a good fee then maybe this would allow Warne a little bit of money to spend.

  5. 22 minutes ago, admira said:

    If true, it’s starting to look like the club is being asset stripped. 

    Ahhh yes. A man who bleeds black and white, who was part of the march to save the club. Spends about £50 million of his own money to sell a couple of young lads for about £4 million quid.

     

     

  6. Would have to bring someone in before he left in my opinion.

    We are already short in midfield so selling him with no replacement would be daft.

    Not sure if we got a relatively decent fee for him (£2 million) that this would allow Warne to spend maybe half of it.

    If we replaced him with a midfielder who chips in with more goals then I'm ok with it.

    He's only got a year left. So he either stays and signs a new deal or moves on.

  7. 1 hour ago, BPV said:

    Think he comes across as a great bloke, and absolutely gave his all for us at times, especially that Wednesday game. 

    However, if this is where we’re at in terms of signing attacking players it’s a pretty scathing insight to our recruitment at the minute.

    I’d be absolutely fine with him as a 4th choice option, but with Washington yet to feature in a friendly, he’d be our 2nd choice going into the start of the season.

    To say we needed another good striking option even before we lost Mcgoldrick, it’s really not looking all that promising going into this season. Obviously there’s still a few weeks left to bring players in, but it’s unlikely to be anyone of any real top quality is it? 

    I don't think it's a scathing insight into our recruitment. More on what's available.

    Our recruitment so far has been very good.

    It sounds to me like he's a last resort if we can't get anything over the line.

    I think Huddersfield/Rhodes is similar to the Collins/Cardiff situation. The player needs paying up if they the club wants them out. If they don't offer the player something acceptable then that player can't go anywhere. 

    If we don't manage to sign someone permanently. Then I would hope we'd bring Waghorn in and a young striker on loan. Potentially a Stansfield/Coburn type.

  8. 4 minutes ago, Caerphilly Ram said:

    Oh yeah, here he is. The pics on the site are odd, I know it’s showing off their new kit but the absence of Derby players in the shots seems very deliberate 

    https://www.htafc.com/news/2023/july/see-our-new-third-kit-in-action/

    E6B28513-382F-4612-9B18-6A819B4E7B0F.jpeg

    Yeah it's definitely deliberate. No way you can take that many photos without having an opposition player in shot.

    They must have had to Photoshop us out 🤣🤣

  9. 1 hour ago, Rample said:

    I think

    a) it might have something to do with Rhodes wanting a pay off and as a result them wanting a few to offset it,

    b) Not wanting to pay loan fees or full wages for players not guaranteed to be starters,

    Both will probably still happen but on our terms.

    Alternately 

    c) you can't get a decent striker for 200k could translate to you can get a decent centre back for that.  So if you can move Cashin on for example then maybe you could afford a Shaun Barker sized fee for a better striker.

    Maybe Cash plus cash for Ladapo or someone similar could emerge in the coming weeks. 

    Well if we did that we'd have 3 centre backs all season and we play a back 3.

    So we'd have to use the money to sign a centre back 

  10. 3 minutes ago, eddy779h34 said:

    Jordan Rhodes has scored 10 goals in the last two seasons 

    been on the downward slide since 2017 just saying is this the future ?  He won't hit 25 goals to get you outta this league thats for sure 

    Of course it's not the future. Unfortunately for our future to get any brighter we need out of this league. So we need a short term fix. We don't have money to spend so there isn't a great deal out there.

    We don't need him to hit 25 goals mate.

    We need him to chip in. If all 3 strikers can get 10-15 goals each then that's fine. 

    We're in League One.

    Other ones mentioned like Afobe and Assombalonga are similar in the respect that their careers have taken a bit of a nosedive. But all three would potentially be capable of 10-15 goals in League one imo.

  11. 22 minutes ago, Ramdale said:

    Josh Coburn likely to go out on loan again from Middlesbrough after a good spell at Bristol Rovers last year. Would be ideal to fill the void at striker & much more appealing than Rhodes. Good size, with pace & power

    Good choice this. Would make sense too.

    Just had a quick look and he was injured early in pre season but back training this week.

    So could potentially be one we're looking at and why he's not signed yet...

  12. 3 minutes ago, Ambitious said:

    Steven Sessegnon makes sense at the LWB position, he immediately came to mind. 

    Godden or Rhodes seems to be the striker choice. No idea on the number 10, same as you. Josh Onomah would make more sense than Dack, but would guess he would get a Championship club. 

    Yeah good shout. Only thing with Sessegnon is that he's a right back.

    Granted he played left wing back for Charlton but his stronger foot is his right. I think Warne would prefer a left footer there.

    Godden would be my number one choice. I just think he'd command a fee and from Warne's comments the other day that doesn't look like something we'd do.

    Josh Onomah would be a great signing 

×
×
  • Create New...