WharfedaleRam

I’m going, it has to be loud and proud but no trouble. I won’t be buying anything in the ground either.

Don't worry, there's always loads of spare seats in the rest of the ground!

Don't worry, there's always loads of spare seats in the rest of the ground!

Sorry I forgot, they seem to be winning a few at the minute. Just wait til after we beat them......!

Surely a fag packet isn't such a big deal to bring??!!

Wow, what a great aerial view! I think we were somewhere near the white flare smoke towards the top of the photo.
In 55 seasons, I don't think I've been among a bigger throng moving toward a venue than this march - that includes mega-gigs and finals/fixtures in London, Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff and beyond!
My poster shown on the the day, below. The sticking-point of the 'creditor / claimant' legal status of the bogus MFC and WW compensation claims is the main reason why the EFL will not permit a preferred bidder to be named. 
Guys & Girls, we have (finally) moved politicians and influencers off their butts to act for us and demand progress on the salvation of the club - and I feel we fans must now focus upon raising the perception and dangers of these parasitic, blackmailing characters.
C O Y R 

Not by me

PMSL Roy, What would the invoice say, From Paddy Power for Boro...expected earnings for promotion £45m.
                                                                            VAT No...T W A T 666
                                                                   From Thief,Extortion and Robber USA Lawyers for WW for relegation £6m.
                                                                            VAT No ...A S S W I P E 999

Surely a fag packet isn't such a big deal to bring??!!

What a turn out, so proud of you all COYR ????

Great news about Tom , now lead us to Championship survival skipper

Over to you Twelveincher

Bury away - first friendly next season??

Watching re-runs of thrashing Boro away is proving very therapeutic!

Will somebody please buy the EFL a dictionary, so they can understand the difference between a 'claimant' and a 'creditor'? The two fantasy figure cases produced by the vexatious claimants cannot possibly lead to them being treated as creditors. Once they are removed from the equation (whether they decide to pursue their ridiculous claims or not) surely the takeover can proceed?! Or is this a rose-tinted, simplistic view of the true position?

Let's be honest. The reason we've been given another 4 weeks is to make sure we can't sign anybody and potentially have to lose more players. The EFL, plus the people making the spurious claims, are terrified to death that we might just gain enough points to avoid relegation this season, despite the 21 points deduction and umpteen transfer embargoes already.

Let's be honest. The reason we've been given another 4 weeks is to make sure we can't sign anybody and potentially have to lose more players. The EFL, plus the people making the spurious claims, are terrified to death that we might just gain enough points to avoid relegation this season, despite the 21 points deduction and umpteen transfer embargoes already.

Rick Parry was on 5 Live last week saying that 'the EFL have processes to deal with club disputes', referring to the Boro and Wycombe claims.
We are all guessing at what's really happening and what the order of priorities is but we do know that if the vexatious claims went away, or were classed as non-footballing debts, then we'd be in a better position.
We should encourage the MP's and media to force the EFL to convene a meeting/tribunal (or whatever the process is) in the next week.
If we win and they are dismissed and/or deemed non-footballing debts, then we're over a hurdle.
If we lose and they are deemed footballing debts, we may lose a bidder and ultimately we may get liquidated but..........
......as soon as they are deemed footballing debts, we go after QPR, Villa etc and register those made up figures (£200m?) on our balance sheet. When pressed, they will not dare to legitimise the Boro and Wycombe claims.
We have to bring this one to a head.

I just can't stomach the idea of Boro or Wycombe getting a penny for their extortion, which is what this is. The fact that EFL are so weak and Lilly livered about this just shows how much they need to be sent to oblivion.

Let's be honest. The reason we've been given another 4 weeks is to make sure we can't sign anybody and potentially have to lose more players. The EFL, plus the people making the spurious claims, are terrified to death that we might just gain enough points to avoid relegation this season, despite the 21 points deduction and umpteen transfer embargoes already.

Watching re-runs of thrashing Boro away is proving very therapeutic!

I'd assumed the point was if their claims were dealt with as part of the administration process, such future legal claims would not be possible, or would at least be severely compromised. Hence the administrators wanting to get clarity that the EFL doesn't consider them "football creditors" - so they can essentially compress the claims, and tell investors they don't need to worry about them, without the EFL vetoing the deal/kicking us out of the league. 
The "Binnie compromise" seems to me to be something like "Okay we won't deal with these claims at all during administration and just look at them later". I daresay other would-be investors want them dealt with now as potential liabilities of £50m or so are pretty off-putting when the club isn't worth anything like that.
It's incredibly annoying how Boro and Wycombe are acting like creditors in this process when they are actually claimants. 

Let's be honest. The reason we've been given another 4 weeks is to make sure we can't sign anybody and potentially have to lose more players. The EFL, plus the people making the spurious claims, are terrified to death that we might just gain enough points to avoid relegation this season, despite the 21 points deduction and umpteen transfer embargoes already.