1of4
-
Posts
3,485 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by 1of4
-
-
2 hours ago, i-Ram said:
You keep to reading the Morning Star, Comrade. I dont want you drifting to the moderate middle ground.
I've never claimed or want to stand on the middle ground, so don't worry I'm sure I won't be drifting off towards it anytime soon. Unlike some who purport to have no political leanings but who's views now make them believe that a person with modicum of socialism is a raving left-wing loony.
- i-Ram and Comrade 86
-
1
-
1
-
16 hours ago, Ramarena said:
Right then, anyone see Putin's concert/rally in Moscow today?
Well if you saw the kids on stage, many of them were the Ukrainian kids kidnapped from Mariupol, they we're paraded around and made to give thanks to Russia for "saving" them and sending them to filtration camps for re-education.
The soldier in the middle was celebrated for "saving" over 300 kids from Ukraine!
300 radicalized children supporting the enemy of their country of birth.
Presumably Ukraine have disowned these children and taken away their citizenship.
-
48 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said:
As always - I much prefer it when people don't disguise their right-wing views with claims of being oh-so moderate centrists
Respect
Unfortunately many people who have been radicalized by the right-wing media, still believe they are moderate centralists.
-
7 hours ago, rammieib said:
You know we won 2-0 right? ?
Yep. I was there, I know we won. I also know we wasted a number of changes. Which may be why I scored what I did. Isn't what this thread is about, giving you're own personal opinion on each players performance?
You appear to be implying I should have given higher scores because we won. Ok so I give higher scores for the Charlton game, like you and many other have. What score should I give when we win another game by more goals or against a better team.
Ask @Ellafella to increase the numbers we can give, so I can turn it up to an eleven.
- Ellafella and Carl Sagan
-
1
-
1
-
-
34 minutes ago, Archied said:
Same old same old
no and no
we have personal experience of a young lady we know who being rather less endowed was given breast implants on the badgering that it was causing her mental health problem ,,,, wrong
woman losing breasts through Brest cancer having reconstructive surgery,,,, right
ivf on the nhs ,,,, wrong
now if and or when we have an NHS that is not in constant crisis with money time and staff not stretched to the limit then perhaps we can do that sort of stuff but it’s a no for me right now
Not sure what is implied with the sentence Same old same old. As far has I can recall there hasn't been any earlier discussions on what an essential health system looks like. So whats the same and whats old?
Is the first no, a no to treating drunks and thus the possibility of them dying, with the second no, being that cancer patients should be getting aftercare cosmetic treatment? Hopefully you can clarify this, as I wouldn't want to imply you'd be in favour of anyone's death.
On a lighter note, the we in your post, is this use of we a royal we. Or are you claiming there is a young lady who's breasts we both have had personal experience of. If it's the latter, could you please not spread it around as I wouldn't like my wife to gain access to this information.
-
2 hours ago, Archied said:
Well whoopi dooo let’s let people die whilst we improve couples mental well being , this is why we are in the mess we are in
Who wants to let people die? The question I asked was what do we class as essential health care?
You apparently have decided what is and isn't an essential treatment that should be provided by the NHS.
Just to clarify things, is treating the drunk slumped on the ground an essential service or should we do a whoopi do when they are choking on their own vomit?
Should we be telling cancer patients we won't be providing any cosmetic aftercare, but don't worry how you look just be thankful you're alive?
-
4 hours ago, Archied said:
I also look at how the nhs has expanded since it’s beginning, does it spend huge amounts now beyond keeping us alive and healthy , stuff like IVF and multiple other issues that perhaps need to be reviewed in terms of we seem to be struggling to provide the basic essential health system it started out as
What should we deem basic essential health care?
Should we leave the drunk slumped on the floor? What about the person injured playing sport? Or the injured inexperienced DIYer?
Should these people be charged to gain access to treatment by an essential health care system?
Should we ignore treatments that aren't deemed essential but could have a secondary affect to the patient's well being?
What should we tell the person that's lost a limb, the skin cancer patients that may need a prosthetic arm, leg, ear or nose? Sorry mate we've saved your life, you'll need to pay for the prosthetic yourself
As for stuff like IFV. I'm aware of couples who's mental well being have been improved due to the success of IFV. What are we actually treating the inability to get pregnant, the patient's well being or both
As I said at the start what is deemed essential?
-
-
-
-
2 hours ago, The Last Post said:
Nope...Cornmarket ? https://picturethepast.org.uk/image-library/image-details/poster/DRBY000306/posterid/DRBY000306.html
Slug and Lettuce was the old Ramsdens
The Slug and Lettuce on Irongate was a Berni Inn.
Ramsdens was on the Cornmarket.
- I know nothing, Crewton and Ram-Alf
-
1
-
2
-
-
-
19 hours ago, Rev said:
Felt my first tit to that song, happy days.
Felt many in my life, unfortunately it as often been the right one.
-
3 hours ago, Crewton said:
Interesting piece on the founder of the Wagner Group and his private penal batallion. Definitely not Nazis though.
Isn't this same guy that the government have allegedly help avoid sanctions that are being imposed on Russian oligarchs
-
3 hours ago, Mostyn6 said:
the Velodrome was supposed to be an option for this kinda stuff too.
How many can the Velodrome seat? Why are we even using it to hold anything but for what it was supposedly designed for.
Using the Velodrome as a concert venue, shows why Derby haven't got any descent venues that are capable of attracting and holding major events
We build a Velodrome to hold bike races but it can't be used for international competitions due to It's lack of seating. Then what do we do? We make the same mistake again when the long awaited swimming pool is built, at least they got the length of the pool correct.
So what can we expect to get for the levelling up 20 mill plus whatever the council chucks in.
Maybe an updated version of the old smoke damaged assembly rooms. A building that had a variety of uses but wasn't good enough or big enough to attract the major events.
-
-
-
On 19/01/2023 at 20:47, Elwood P Dowd said:
This article provides an image of what is being proposed to replace the current building.
How is spending twenty million quid on revamping a fire damaged building, going to help with levelling up the country?
-
I've been critical of him but can't fault him today. He put a shift in, showed what he can do when he sets his mind to it.
-
A good pint of Bass shouldn't have a head on it. Unfortunately to many pubs serve a pint of Bass with a head on it.
- Crewton, NG2Ram, Reggie Greenwood and 1 other
-
4
-
6 hours ago, Stive Pesley said:
Bastani's book "Fully Automated Luxury Communism" is an interesting read on this subject
The above post that was a response to a post of my own, as left me a little puzzled. Not the post per say but the emoji it generated.
I know I'm not amongst the smartest members on here. So I'm hoping someone can explain why the laughing emoji, as I'm failing to see the joke.
-
9 hours ago, David said:
Never written a line of code in my life so wouldn't know where to start ?
As you say raises questions, questions which for me are worrying.
Cars, undoubtedly the roads will be much safer once the technology gets there, HGV's will naturally follow eventually with no driver at all, no rest stops, 24/7 on the roads.
Planes, trains, boats....
All sounds great until you think about the job losses.
If we have everything done for us by AI systems, meaning the loss of thousands if not millions of jobs. Where are people going to get the money to buy the services that are being provided by these automated systems?
Will people that are still required to manually carry out certain tasks be paid a fortune? Would these jobs end up being sheared between ten, twenty a hundred people, would all these workers be paid a living wage for a few hours work?
Would we see the introduction of a national wage?
content://com.amazon.cloud9.FileProvider/images/screenshot/16744170609511498442154.jpg
Derby County v Cheltenham Town: Player Ratings
in Derby County Forum
Posted
Wildsmith:-6.5
Smith:-6.5
Forsyth:-6.5
Cashin:-6.5
Roberts:-6.5
White:-6.5
Hourihane:-6.5
Mendez-Laing:-6.5
Knight:-7
Dobbin:-7
McGoldrick:-7.5
Sibley:-6
Springett:-6
Barkhuizen:-6
Collins:-6
Thompson:-6