The Paul Warne Poll - Part 2

[Tyler Durden]

I'm still waiting for this magical list to be generated of teams we should be beating at home.

The more cynical of us could then generate the poll again immediately after not winning against one of those said teams (if the list ever materialises) to then gain the desired outputs.

Not that anyone on here would have any intentions of doing that, naturally. 

[oodledoodle]

6 minutes ago, Tyler Durden said:

I'm still waiting for this magical list to be generated of teams we should be beating at home.

The more cynical of us could then generate the poll again immediately after not winning against one of those said teams (if the list ever materialises) to then gain the desired outputs.

Not that anyone on here would have any intentions of doing that, naturally. 

Waiting for a list of forum members that say we should be beating everyone.

The major concern is performances. There's a world of difference in playing well and losing, and playing like we do and losing. It's about not having any excitement for the next game.

[RoyMac5]

34 minutes ago, Tyler Durden said:

I'm still waiting for this magical list to be generated of teams we should be beating at home.

The more cynical of us could then generate the poll again immediately after not winning against one of those said teams (if the list ever materialises) to then gain the desired outputs.

Not that anyone on here would have any intentions of doing that, naturally. 

List all the other League one teams and there is your answer.

[Malty]

Having considered this we need a sixth option …. NEXT October. 
 

Like it or not I think we have to “trust the process” and wait until next year to see if this horrible style of football really will work.  He needs two chances, the second one with solely his players. 

That means we have to sacrifice our best young players - Bird, Sibley (he’s ruining Sibley and doesn’t care), Cashin and probably Thommo as well. We have to let Warne do all he can to get us up and when he doesn’t he needs to be removed as quickly as possible …. And when he does he also needs to be removed as soon as possible so that we can have a manager who will implement a style of play that is designed to get promotion from the Championship rather than League One.

I’m afraid I’m resigned to rubbish football for another 13 months. 🙁🙁🙁

[RoyMac5]

5 minutes ago, Malty said:

Like it or not I think we have to “trust the process” and wait until next year to see if this horrible style of football really will work.  He needs two chances, the second one with solely his players. 

That means we have to sacrifice our best young players - Bird, Sibley (he’s ruining Sibley and doesn’t care), Cashin and probably Thommo as well. We have to let Warne do all he can to get us up and when he doesn’t he needs to be removed as quickly as possible …. And when he does he also needs to be removed as soon as possible so that we can have a manager who will implement a style of play that is designed to get promotion from the Championship rather than League One.

I’m afraid I’m resigned to rubbish football for another 13 months. 🙁🙁🙁

What? Why on earth do we have to do that? 

[May Contain Nuts]

One win, one defeat and one draw  against teams we thought we might be directly competing with since running the poll the first time is hardly cynically capitalising on poor results when 2 of them could be considered good results and the other blamed on (overturned) refereeing decisions.

Edited September 19, 2023 by Kokosnuss

[Blondest Goat]

1 hour ago, Andicis said:

The league table is based on 46 games, this poll is not based on even a quarter of that. 

My vote was based on the dross Warne has been serving up for nearly a year.   Results, performances, recruitment, interviews etc.  Plenty of evidence to form an opinion.  

[Curtains]

So I’m still happy with Warne .

We will be up there at the end of the season fighting for promotion 

[Malty]

19 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said:

What? Why on earth do we have to do that? 

- No more chopping and changing managers 

- Gives him the best chance and a long enough time to make it work

- cheaper to not switch so regularly

- it does at least  seem to work away (and we have been pants away for years)

- at least we have stability

- anything that comes after had to be better

[RoyMac5]

8 minutes ago, Malty said:

- No more chopping and changing managers 

- Gives him the best chance and a long enough time to make it work

- cheaper to not switch so regularly

- it does at least  seem to work away (and we have been pants away for years)

- at least we have stability

- anything that comes after had to be better

That assumes it works - it hasn't looked like it so far. How much will it cost us with a squad of Warne athletes and losing youngsters, just to give Warne another 13 months? And afterwards we are left with a squad to play only the same way.

[Tyler Durden]

22 minutes ago, Blondest Goat said:

My vote was based on the dross Warne has been serving up for nearly a year.   Results, performances, recruitment, interviews etc.  

Apart from that he's alright 

[Malty]

1 hour ago, RoyMac5 said:

That assumes it works - it hasn't looked like it so far. How much will it cost us with a squad of Warne athletes and losing youngsters, just to give Warne another 13 months? And afterwards we are left with a squad to play only the same way.

That’s the price of trust in the process and stability 

[Ghost of Clough]

7 minutes ago, Malty said:

That’s the price of trust in the process and stability 

Same logic as trusting Tommy Doc. Out go Gemmill, Hector, Todd, Boulton, Webster, George and Nish... In come Daly, Curran, Masson, Hill, etc...

[IlsonDerby]

3 hours ago, Tyler Durden said:

I'm still waiting for this magical list to be generated of teams we should be beating at home.

The more cynical of us could then generate the poll again immediately after not winning against one of those said teams (if the list ever materialises) to then gain the desired outputs.

Not that anyone on here would have any intentions of doing that, naturally. 

No need for a magical list - I’ll let you pick any 11 teams in the division. Pick the top 11 if you like - we shouldn’t be only winning 2 out of those eleven matches at home. 

[Comrade 86]

Think we might need another poll...

 

[AbuDerbyDave]

16 minutes ago, Comrade 86 said:

Think we might need another poll...

 

That’s not a poll that’s the hokey kokey 😂

[oodledoodle]

9 minutes ago, AbuDerbyDave said:

That’s not a poll that’s the hokey kokey 😂

Hopefully Warne can turn it around, that's what it's all about.

[BramcoteRam84]

So tonight while it’s not fully representative of the league was broadly positive, some good performances from players building fitness. More options starting to come back, the last 4 signings all players of the right age group, and a potentially top class signing in Nyambe (see my post in the Nyambe thread). 
 

Said it several times and will say it again. It’s too early to judge and with our fixtures, Vale away is the right time IMO to make a judgment. 

[8Leeds]

Same style of play this weekend please. 

[8Leeds]

5 hours ago, Tyler Durden said:

I'm still waiting for this magical list to be generated of teams we should be beating at home.

The more cynical of us could then generate the poll again immediately after not winning against one of those said teams (if the list ever materialises) to then gain the desired outputs.

Not that anyone on here would have any intentions of doing that, naturally. 

All of these. 😂