Archied Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 1 minute ago, PistoldPete said: I don't know if that is an attempt at sarcasm. If so, misplaced. I put it to you that you know full well it is sarcasm mr Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 2 hours ago, Grumpy Git said: One thing that this boycott proves, is that the current government is one of the most despised in living memory. By people that work for the BBC. Since the last Tory Government. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 1 minute ago, Archied said: I put it to you that you know full well it is sarcasm mr Pete I genuinely don't. If the Rev is seriously questioning my grasp of the law they had better put up or shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 3 hours ago, i-Ram said: Genuine question. Are you, or any one else supporting Big Ears, got any examples of the language being used by the UK Government that is similar to that used by the German Government in 1930. 2 or 3 examples should satisfy me that he might have a point. Bump. Come on, someone help me out here. Bessie1 and Gisby 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 8 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: I genuinely don't. If the Rev is seriously questioning my grasp of the law they had better put up or shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 10 minutes ago, i-Ram said: Bump. Come on, someone help me out here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 1 hour ago, 86 Hair Islands said: Makes sense. By the way, what's your Twitter username? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archied Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 55 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: I genuinely don't. If the Rev is seriously questioning my grasp of the law they had better put up or shut up. Objection Ram-Alf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 52 minutes ago, Archied said: I put it to you that you know full well it is sarcasm mr Pete I was merely complimenting Mr Pete, as you put it, on his legal knowledge, and referencing his past contributions to this forum in this area. Quite why you've seen fit to interject yourself in this debate I'm unsure? Perhaps you're a fan of a big spoon, perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archied Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Rev said: I was merely complimenting Mr Pete, as you put it, on his legal knowledge, and referencing his past contributions to this forum in this area. Quite why you've seen fit to interject yourself in this debate I'm unsure? Perhaps you're a fan of a big spoon, perhaps? I put it to you mr rev that it was sarcasm and the joke went over your head ??♂️ perhaps on thought it doesn’t come across in the written form rather than verbal with a posh authoritative barrister s voice mimic Edited March 11, 2023 by Archied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 8 minutes ago, Archied said: I put it to you mr rev that it was sarcasm and the joke went over your head ??♂️ Sustained Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 If this article is true then there is nothing in Lineker's contract outlining social media rules and the BBC would likely lose any legal case on the matter. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bbc-gary-lineker-sack-contract-b2298816.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said: If this article is true then there is nothing in Lineker's contract outlining social media rules and the BBC would likely lose any legal case on the matter. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bbc-gary-lineker-sack-contract-b2298816.html Which begs the question, what the hell are they playing at? Who advised them to take this mad course of action? I think I know given the links the upper echelons of the BBC have to our current government. Anyone got a better idea? Edited March 11, 2023 by JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta TuffLuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstand Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 12 minutes ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said: Which begs the question, what the hell are they playing at? Who advised them to take this mad course of action? I think I know given the links the upper echelons of the BBC have to our current government. Anyone got a better idea? You only need to read the comments section of the BBC website on a regular basis to understand the BBC is against the Tories. Try posting anything different it’s removed on a regular basis. Or see the bias on question time. This is why there are now trying to prove they are independent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstand Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 Breaking news the BBC have given in to Linekers demands and have announced his new co-presenter. bimmerman, Ram-Alf and Norman 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTedd Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 1 hour ago, i-Ram said: Bump. Come on, someone help me out here. Well that’s just silly. Clearly there are no examples. The Germans would’ve been using German words. bimmerman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 44 minutes ago, Archied said: I put it to you mr rev that it was sarcasm and the joke went over your head ??♂️ perhaps on thought it doesn’t come across in the written form rather than verbal with a posh authoritative barrister s voice mimic If u fink I'm that fick, I'll adjourn from this debate from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 "MotD to be 20 minutes long with no commentary BBC One will broadcast a much-reduced episode of Match of the Day this evening, the BBC's sport editor Dan Roan says. There will be no commentary on the highlights. It is currently scheduled to begin at 22:20 GMT." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gisby Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 Simple one for me. Too much smoke & mirrors going on. He’s paid by a public corporation. He’s taking the public’s coin. Whether I agree with him or not is irrelevant, he doesn’t speak for me yet he is on my payroll. If he wants to make political statements then he should resign, go work in the private sector and have the same conversation about his social media posts with his then employer. No longer my problem and therefore I’m not interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted March 11, 2023 Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 12 minutes ago, cstand said: You only need to read the comments section of the BBC website on a regular basis to understand the BBC is against the Tories. Try posting anything different it’s removed on a regular basis. Or see the bias on question time. This is why there are now trying to prove they are independent. Ah yes, the anti Tory bias. Lead by the famously left leaning chairman of the BBC who used to manage Sunak and helped Johnson get an 800k loan. Or the very left leaning Robbie Gibb who was the former director of communications for the Tories and whose brother is a Tory MP. Or perhaps the current director general who once stood as a Tory councillour. If it looks like a turd and smells like a turd it's probably a turd. Edited March 11, 2023 by JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Rev and GboroRam 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now